Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009634
Original file (20100009634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    14 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009634 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the reason for his discharge be changed from homosexual admission to medical.

2.  The applicant states he said he was gay because he was worried about his family and got wrapped up in what was happening with his father.  He believed that if he was deployed to Iraq he would end up getting himself or others killed due to his lack of focus on the battlefield.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 2007, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

2.  On 6 August 2007, the applicant's unit commander recommended discharge processing be initiated.  He stated "After I read PV2 Z____ his rights per DA Form 3881, which he waived, he volunteered to me that he is a homosexual and that he was tired of living the double life that he had been living." 

3.  The applicant was afforded physical and mental health evaluations which found no physical or mental abnormalities, and he was determined to be medically fit for retention or appropriate separation.
4.  On 23 August 2007, the applicant submitted a written statement wherein he indicated that he was homosexual and could no longer take the stress of living in hiding and fear of being found out.

5.  On 24 August 2007, his unit commander initiated the formal separation proceeding and recommended the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge.

6.  On 26 August 2007, after consulting with counsel, the applicant acknowledged his rights under the contemplated discharge action for homosexual conduct (admission) under chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations).  He invoked his right to counsel but waived a hearing by an administrative separation board and declined to make an additional statement in his own behalf.

7.  On 3 October 2007, the separation authority approved the separation and directed the applicant receive an honorable discharge.

8.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 19 October 2007 for homosexual conduct (admission).  He had 9 months and 17 days of creditable service.  

9.  Army Regulation 635–200, chapter 15, states homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the Army.  A statement that demonstrates a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts is grounds for discharge not because it reflects the Soldier’s sexual orientation, but because the statement indicates a likelihood that the Soldier engages in, or will engage in, homosexual acts.  If the unit/immediate commander determines, based on the fact-finding inquiry, that a basis for discharge exists, they will take action required by the administrative board procedures and ensure that a medical examination and mental status evaluation are conducted.

10.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

11.  The Uniform Code Of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 107 (False Statements), provides that any person who, with intent to deceive, signs any false record or other official document or makes any other false official statement shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.  The Table of Maximum Punishment shows that a Soldier convicted under Article 107 may receive a maximum punishment of a punitive discharge, five years confinement, and a total forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he said he was gay because he was worried about his family and got wrapped up in what was happening with his father.  He believed that if he was deployed to Iraq he would end up getting himself or others killed due to his lack of focus on the battlefield.

2.  Whether or not the applicant is in fact homosexual is irrelevant.  He submitted multiple statements that he was gay and this is the only reason he was considered for discharge at that time.  

3.  If the Board is to believe that the applicant is telling the truth now about his sexual orientation, it must also accept that he deliberately lied at the time of his discharge.  This is a serious violation that carries the potential of a punitive discharge under the UCMJ.

4.  The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any evidence of any medical condition incurred while entitled to receive basic pay.  At the time of his separation physical examination, competent medical authority determined that the applicant was medically fit for retention or appropriate separation.  

5.  The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations.  The type of discharge directed and the reason therefore is appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009634



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009634



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802386

    Original file (9802386.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force ordered recoupment without stating any reasons justifying recoupment under its regulations. The Air Force policy requires homosexuals to be discharged due to their sexual orientation, but permits recoupment only under certain circumstances. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 27 October 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Douglas J. Heady, Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00010

    Original file (BC-2011-00010.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    4) His UOTHC discharge characterization failed to reflect his honorable character in the Air Force, exemplified in his service record and in the recommendations of his superiors. His ex-wife’s testimony proved pivotal to the outcome of the proceedings; in which the BOI recommended a UOTHC discharge; and ignored his entire service record and the recommendations of his superiors, and belied his years of honorable service. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010281

    Original file (20100010281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code of "4" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 29 June 2007, be changed to an RE "3," "2" or "1" so that he may be eligible to reenter the Army. The commander stated in Part III (Summary of Counseling) that he was counseling the applicant on the definitions of "Bisexual," "Homosexual," "Sexual Orientation," and "Homosexual Conduct," which included a homosexual act, a statement of homosexuality, and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0000383

    Original file (0000383.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The determinative issue is solely whether Air Force counsel can prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that my client stated his sexual orientation for the specific purpose of seeking separation from the Air Force. The Air Force Judge Advocate General (JAG) agrees with the argument advanced by the applicant in the Reply Brief of 30 Sep 00 that the Board could only require recoupment of AFHPSP funds if it found that the applicant made his statement of homosexual orientation for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009308

    Original file (20060009308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his uncharacterized discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), Chapter 15 (Discharge for Homosexual Conduct) be changed to a medical discharge. Although the approval document was not in his military records, the applicant was clearly discharged from the Regular Army on 18 December 2002. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military or medical records that shows that he was being considered for a medical...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00221

    Original file (ND04-00221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. (2) I recommend that upon member’s discharge his naval service be characterized as “honorable”. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20010119 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of homosexuality - homosexual admission (A).

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2005-056

    Original file (2005-056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He informed me that [the applicant] made the statement to him that she was gay. On January 25, 1999, the Commander, Coast Guard Group Mobile, issued a letter informing the applicant that she was being discharged from the Coast Guard for homosexual conduct. On January 27, 1999, the Commander, Coast Guard Group Mobile, issued a memorandum to the Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC), recommending that the applicant be administratively discharged by reason of unsuitability.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600233

    Original file (ND0600233.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 901206: Medical evaluation requested by Desron Two Medical to Psychiatry, Lafayette Rover: 26 year old white male no previous psych history treated for depression in South Florida prior to enlistment presently with 5 months CAD, states mood swings and depression related to inability to adapt to military life style. PE Alert/oriented & articulate, NAD clear logical...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004934

    Original file (AR20090004934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I want to serve my country but am not able to due to my confusion as a child and my niativety during Basic Training to do exactly what I was told, no questions asked. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017000

    Original file (20070017000.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. On 17 February 2005, the applicant was informed that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, due to his homosexual admission. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records...