Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010281
Original file (20100010281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    30 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010281 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code of "4" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 29 June 2007, be changed to an RE "3," "2" or "1" so that he may be eligible to reenter the Army.

2.  The applicant states he is not a homosexual and he would like to recant his admission so that he can reenlist in the Army.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 30 March 2007, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve for a period of 8 years under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP).  On 18 April 2007, he was released from the DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 April 2007, for a period of 4 years.  

2.  A DA Form 4856-E (Developmental Counseling Form), dated 15 May 2007, shows the applicant was counseled by his company commander.  The commander stated in Part III (Summary of Counseling) that he was counseling the applicant on the definitions of "Bisexual," "Homosexual," "Sexual Orientation," and "Homosexual Conduct," which included a homosexual act, a statement of homosexuality, and/or homosexual marriage/attempted marriage.  He also stated that if the applicant's conduct continued he would initiate action to separate him from the Army. 

3.  A copy of a second DA Form 4856-E, dated 1 June 2007, shows the applicant  was notified that he was being recommended for separation in accordance with chapter 15 (Homosexuality) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations).  The applicant agreed with the counseling and authenticated this form with his signature.

4.  On 30 May 2007, the applicant submitted a DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement) in which he admitted to participation in homosexual acts with several members of the same sex.  He stated he believed he had a natural propensity to engage in sexual activity with members of the same sex.  

5.  On 4 June 2007, the applicant's commanding officer informed the applicant he was initiating action to separate him for homosexual conduct with an entry-level, uncharacterized discharge.  The commander stated the reason for this action was the applicant voluntarily disclosed he was a homosexual and that he had homosexual tendencies. 

6.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and stated that he waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and declined the opportunity to consult with counsel.  He also chose not to submit any statements on his behalf.  

7.  The applicant's commanding officer recommended to the separation authority that the applicant be discharged due to homosexual acts.  In his recommendation he indicated that a report of mental status evaluation or psychiatric evaluation was attached.  

8.  A copy of a DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 20 June 2007, shows the applicant was medically qualified for separation with a physical profile serial of 1 1 1 1 2 2.  

9.  The applicant's battalion commander concurred with the applicant's company commander's recommendation and forwarded the request to the separation authority.   

10.  On 26 June 2007, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge due to homosexual conduct and directed that the applicant be issued an entry-level, uncharacterized discharge.  





11.  The applicant was discharged at Fort Benning, GA on 29 June 2007.   His DD Form 214 shows the following entries:

* Item 11 (Primary Specialty) – None//Nothing Follows
* Item 12 (Record of Service), item c (Net Active Service This Period) 
2 months and 12 days
* Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – None//Nothing Follows
* Item 14 (Military Education) – None//Nothing Follows
* Item 25 (Separation Authority) - Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 
15-3b
* Item 26 (Separation Code) – JRB
* Item 27 (Reentry Code) – 4
* Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – Homosexual Conduct (Admission)

12.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 15 of that regulation prescribes separation of Soldiers for homosexuality, and states in pertinent part that homosexual means a person, regardless of sex, who engages in, desires to engage in, or intends to engage in homosexual actions.  The basis for separation may include pre-service, prior service, or current service conduct or statements.  A Soldier will be separated if he or she has stated that he or she is a homosexual or bisexual, unless there is a further finding that the Soldier is not a homosexual or bisexual.

13.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) defines the SPD Codes used on the DD FORM 214.  In this case, Army Regulation 635-5-1 shows that the SPD code "JRB" indicates that the separation authority is "Paragraph 15-3b, Army Regulation 635-200" and the narrative reason for the discharge is “Homosexual Admission."

14.  Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table) establishes the RE codes to be used based on the appropriate SPD code.  In this case, the cross reference table shows that an RE code “4” is assigned when the SPD is "JRB."

15.  These codes are used for administrative purposes only for identification of an enlistment processing procedure.  The RE code of 4 applies to persons separated from his last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification.  This includes anyone discharged as a homosexual or with homosexual tendencies.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his RE code should be changed for the purpose of reentering the Army was carefully considered; however, this is not supported by the evidence provided.

2.  Records show the applicant executed a sworn statement to the effect that he committed homosexual acts.  There is no evidence that his statement was false or otherwise in error.  The Army took his statement at face value and, as a result, he was counseled regarding separation for homosexuality.  

3.  The applicant was separated under the provisions of chapter 15 of Army Regulation 635-200.  At the time of separation, he received an SPD code of JRB and an RE code of 4.  This SPD code was the appropriate code for the applicant for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15.

4.  Furthermore, in accordance with governing regulations, the correct RE code was entered on his DD Form 214 and it was consistent with the reason and authority for discharge.

5.  The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors that would have jeopardized his rights.  It is clear that all requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

6.  Inasmuch as the applicant was discharged based on his own admission of homosexuality, the reason and authority for discharge are correct as currently constituted.  The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument to refute the admission that he made at the time of discharge.  Therefore, there is no basis to grant the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  __x_____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________x________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010281



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010281



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011293

    Original file (AR20070011293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission for making a statement that he was a homosexual or bisexual. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The narrative reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009844

    Original file (AR20080009844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 October 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct for being bisexual and he had a propensity to engage in bisexual activity, with an honorable discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010788

    Original file (AR20080010788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 July 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct because he had created a rebuttable presumption which indicates he engaged in, attempted to engage in, or had a propensity to engage in, or intended to engage in homosexual or bisexual acts, with an honorable discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019671

    Original file (20080019671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE code 4 to RE code 3. It also shows SPD codes with their corresponding RE codes. In view of the fact that the applicant did not specifically request a correction to item 12a of his DD Form 214, this error will not be corrected at this time.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008918

    Original file (AR20060008918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The analyst noted that the applicant voluntarily requested discharge based upon his admission that he was bisexual and the unit commander properly initiated discharge proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006649

    Original file (AR20090006649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-2, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission and the desire to commit homosexual acts, with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation Notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the Board found that someone in the discharge process...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020070

    Original file (20080020070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It also shows SPD codes with their corresponding RE code. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application, or the evidence of record, that his assigned RE Code is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008375

    Original file (20070008375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of JRB is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers who separated under the provisions of paragraph 15-3b of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Homosexual Admission. There is no evidence in his record nor did the applicant state in his self-authored statement that he was told to admit to being a homosexual to be with his father. By regulation, the RE-4 code assigned to the applicant was the proper code to assign members separating under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006995

    Original file (AR20060006995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. The analyst noted that the applicant voluntarily requested discharge based upon his admission that he was bisexual and the unit commander properly initiated discharge proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008885

    Original file (AR20060008885.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived his right to legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 21 February 2002, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and...