Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021565
Original file (20090021565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  13 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021565 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his date of entry as 2 December 1976.

2.  The applicant states that his date of entry is wrong due to a typing error. 

3.  The applicant provided no additional documentation in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Enlistment/Travel Order Number 239-8, Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Springfield, Massachusetts, dated 23 November 1977, shows that the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on this date. 
3.  Enlistment/Travel Order Number 245-3, Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Springfield, Massachusetts, dated 2 December 1977, shows that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on this date.

4.  DD Form 4c (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement), page 4, dated 
2 December 1977, indicates that the applicant agreed to serve in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years commencing on 2 December 1977. 

5.  Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) shows:

	a.  delayed enlistment of 9 days from 23 November to 1 December 1977;

	b.  enlistment on 2 December 1977;

	c.  basic combat training from 9 December 1977 to 9 February 1978;

	d.  advanced individual training (AIT) from 10 February to 28 March 1978;

	e.  follow-on AIT from 6 April to 6 July 1978; and

	f.  a general discharge on 7 July 1978.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214, ending on 7 July 1978, shows that he had entered active duty on 2 December 1977 and had completed 7 months and 
6 days of creditable active duty service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as in effective at the time, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provided for the recording of the date of entry in Item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty this Period).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered the U.S. Army on 2 December 1976.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant entered active duty on 2 December 1977 and that this same date was properly and correctly entered on his DD Form 214.


3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021565





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021565



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010319

    Original file (20080010319.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation also states that that the total amount of foreign service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered in block 12f and the country and dates of deployment for an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service will be shown in block 18 on the DD Form 214.. Absent evidence to show the specific dates of deployment to Kuwait, the applicant's request to correct his records to show this service cannot...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003670C070205

    Original file (20060003670C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 19 April 1978. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military service records should be corrected because he underwent a medical examination to enter the Army on 30 October 1976, but his discharge document shows that he entered the Army on 30 August 1977. Moreover, the evidence of record shows that, at the time of his discharge, the applicant placed his signature on his DD Form 214 attesting to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008278

    Original file (20060008278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 12a (Date Entered AD This Period) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Her DD Form 214 shows that she entered initial active duty for training on 23 September 2003. The available evidence shows that the applicant entered active duty on 6 July 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016896

    Original file (20140016896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 February 1980, the applicant's commander informed him he was initiating separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-31 (Expeditious Discharge Program). The applicant requests to be paid for about 80 days of leave, which he asserts he accrued while on active duty and should have been paid on separation. Regarding the accrued leave for which the applicant could be paid, neither the applicant's record nor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002555

    Original file (20090002555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant entered active duty in 1976 or that he was separated from the service in 1976. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to correct the applicant's records to show he entered active duty on 26 June 1976. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001824

    Original file (20080001824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 December 1982 be corrected to show he entered active duty on 13 December 1977 and separated on 7 December 1981. The applicant states that he needs his DD Form(s) 214 to reflect accurate dates of service and the Purple Heart for Department of Veterans Affairs benefits. This DD Form 214 shows his MOS as 63C1O and shows he had not been awarded any awards or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017873

    Original file (20080017873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The record does contain the separation approval document, dated 30 March 1977, in which the separation authority approved the applicant's separation for misconduct and directed the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge, and a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty) that identifies the authority and reason for the applicant's discharge. The separation authority could issue an honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002476

    Original file (20140002476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her service as a Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) cadet be credited for retirement pay purposes. She respectfully requests this information be favorably considered even after the extended length of time and her service record (DD Form 214) be corrected to accurately reflect her Reserve service from 7 September 1976 through 22 December 1978. DOD Financial Management Regulations show the above time is not creditable service; therefore, she is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002219

    Original file (20140002219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Army Good Conduct Medal * Item 14 (Military Education) the Law Enforcement Course was 16 weeks vice 8 weeks in duration and add the Military Police Investigator course 2. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007794

    Original file (20080007794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 July 1978, the applicant's commander recommended that he be discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200 due to fraudulent enlistment for failing to list his convictions in item 40 of his DD Form 1966/4. Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, in effect at the time, provided that commanders exercising general court-martial jurisdiction were authorized to approve a discharge of an enlisted person for fraudulent enlistment or to void a fraudulent enlistment by...