Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002555
Original file (20090002555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE: 	        9 July 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002555 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he entered active duty on 26 June 1976.

2.  The applicant states that his discharge papers show his expiration term of service (ETS) as 1978, but he got out in 1976.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Department of Defense, Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Enlistment/Travel Order Number 131-8, dated 27 June 1978, shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 June 1978.  

3.  The applicant's DD Form 4c (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement) and his DD Form 1966/1 (Application for Enlistment) show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 June 1978.  He placed an "X" in Block 26 (Military Service) of his DD Form 1966/2 indicating that he had never been in the Regular, Reserve, or National Guard of the United States.

4.  Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) also shows he enlisted on 27 June 1978.

5.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center and Fort Dix, Orders 255-189, dated 12 September 1978, show the applicant was discharged on 12 September 1978.  At the time of his discharge, he had completed 2 months and 16 days of active military service.

6.  Item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 27 June 1978.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  In the version in effect at the time, it directed that the date entered active duty would be entered in item 15 of the DD Form 214.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his discharge papers show his ETS as 1978 when he got out in 1976.  He also states he entered active duty in 1976.  However, the preponderance of evidence shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 June 1978 and was discharged on 12 September 1978.  

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 was prepared to properly reflect the date he entered active duty as 27 June 1978.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant entered active duty in 1976 or that he was separated from the service in 1976.

3.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to correct the applicant's records to show he entered active duty on 26 June 1976.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002555





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002555



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010150

    Original file (20080010150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his correct active duty time. The evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 June 1975 and continued to serve until he was honorably discharged on 30 January 1978, for immediate reenlistment. Therefore, there is no basis to change item 12b, of his DD Form 214, dated 30 March 1982 to show the entry "82 03 31" (31 March 1982).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090875C070212

    Original file (2003090875C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the date of birth entered on his 22 July 1985 separation document (DD Form 214) and the date he entered active duty listed on his 17 October 1976 DD Form 214 be corrected. However, this list also shows that the AFEM was not awarded for service in Korea during the period the applicant served in that country between March 1978 and April 1979, and was never awarded for service in Germany during his tenure on active duty. Therefore, the entry in Item 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016779

    Original file (20140016779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Though he requested 25 days of leave he would have only had 23 days of accrued leave on 23 September 1978. c. Furthermore, his DD Form 214 shows he was paid for 4.5 days of leave remaining on the books at the time of his separation; therefore, it is further presumed that he was placed back in a leave status on or around 19 September 1978. d. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided any evidence to show he did not have 4.5 days of leave remaining at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008654

    Original file (20110008654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010167

    Original file (20050010167.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) and Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) of his 12 May 1984 separation document (DD Form 214). Therefore, the time for his to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 16 May 1987.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073220C070403

    Original file (2002073220C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the rank, birth date, net service, and reentry (RE) code listed on his 25 August 1978 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004016.

    Original file (20090004016..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be corrected to reflect that he served for 13 years. On 12 February 1990, the applicant was honorably discharged from the VAARNG and the United States Army Reserve due to the expiration of his service obligation (ETS). The applicant's contention that he served 13 years in the ARNG has been noted; however, he has failed to show through the evidence of record and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000239

    Original file (20090000239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed 4 years of total active service instead of 2 years, 9 months, and 4 days, as currently shown. However, he was discharged on 10 September 1969 and was credited with 2 years, 9 months, and 4 days of active service. The period of service from 5 January 1966 (erroneously shown as 1965 on his reissued DD Form 214) to 10 September 1969 equals 3 years, 8 months, and 6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007013

    Original file (20080007013.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 September 1977, while still in BCT, he was released from military control by reason of a voided enlistment due to fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant’s discharge was ever actually accomplished or that his discharge orders and DD Form 214 were ever published. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004228C070206

    Original file (20050004228C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his 1992 separation document be corrected to show that he enlisted in the military on 21 June 1976 vice 27 February 1978. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.