Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001824
Original file (20080001824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  19 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080001824 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 December 1982 be corrected to show he entered active duty on 13 December 1977 and separated on 7 December 1981.  He requests award of the Purple Heart and, in effect, that other, unspecified awards be added to this DD Form 214.  He also requests, in effect, that item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Years and Months in Specialty) of this DD Form 214 be corrected to read 63C1O (Track Vehicle Mechanic). 

2.  In a second application, the applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 December 1978 be corrected to show he entered active duty on 22 March 1975 and separated on 12 December 1977.  He again requests award of the Purple Heart and, in effect, that other, unspecified awards to be added to this DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant states that he needs his DD Form(s) 214 to reflect accurate dates of service and the Purple Heart for Department of Veterans Affairs benefits.  He states that it was some time in July or August 1975 when the cargo plane landed on the tarmac north of Saigon.  He was loading body bags when he was hit by mortar.  He was hit on the left side of his face, left knee, and right leg.  He received treatment in Vietnam and subsequent knee surgery later in 

Germany.  He states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 for the period ending           7 December 1982 should show his MOS as 63C1O and not 63B1O (Light Wheeled Vehicle/Power Generation Mechanic).

4.  The applicant provides his DD Forms 214 for the period ending 12 December 1978 and the period ending 7 December 1982.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s initial enlistment contract shows he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (Delayed Entry Program) on 8 March 1976 and in the Regular Army on 23 March 1976.  He completed basic training and advanced individual training (AIT) and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63C.

3.  Discharge orders show the applicant was honorably discharged on               12 December 1978 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 December 1978 shows he entered active duty that period on 23 March 1976 and was separated on       12 December 1978.  This DD Form 214 shows his MOS as 63C1O and shows he had not been awarded any awards or decorations.

5.  The applicant’s second enlistment contract shows he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 13 December 1978 for 4 years.  His reenlistment orders show he reenlisted for 4 years.

6.  Sometime between 1 March 1980 and 1 September 1981, MOS 63C was deleted from the Army inventory, and Soldiers holding that MOS were automatically reclassified into MOS 63B.  

7.  Discharge orders dated 21 September 1982 show the applicant was to be discharged effective 12 December 1982.  Discharge orders dated 30 September 1982 changed his discharge date to 7 December 1982.  

8.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 December 1982 shows he entered active duty that period on 13 December 1978 and separated on         7 December 1982.  This DD Form 214 shows his MOS as 63B1O and shows he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, the Overseas Service Ribbon, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Army Service Ribbon.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

10.  Historical research revealed that the North Vietnamese Army overran Saigon on 30 April 1975.  The Department of Veterans Affairs booklet, “Federal Benefits for Veterans and Dependents,” states the Vietnam era ended on 7 May 1975. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s two enlistment contracts agree with the dates of entry on active duty and dates of separation as they are listed on his DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 12 December 1978 and 7 December 1982.  There is no evidence of record to support his contention that he entered active duty on        22 March 1975 or that he served in Vietnam.

2.  There is no evidence of record to show the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart or for any awards not already listed on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 December 1982.

3.  The applicant completed AIT in MOS 63C and was awarded MOS 63C.    That MOS is properly annotated on his DD Form 214 for the period ending        12 December 1978.  However, sometime between 1 March 1980 and                   1 September 1981 MOS 63C was deleted from the Army inventory.  Soldiers holding MOS 63C were automatically reclassified into MOS 63B.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 December 1982 properly shows he held primary MOS 63B1O.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xx____  ___xx___  ___xx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




 _   ______xxxx_____________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080001824





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080001824



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017835

    Original file (20140017835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Orders Number 070-17, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) on 10 March 2008, awarded HHC, 1st Battalion, 184th Infantry Regiment, the Valorous Unit Award for the period 15 January 2005 through 14 January 2006. His record does not contain and he has not provided any evidence or orders that show he was awarded any State awards as a member of the CAARNG. However, his record contains no evidence and he provides no evidence that shows he was promised promotion to, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016804

    Original file (20140016804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and/or his military service records to show he: a. held military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Police) and 75C (Personnel Management Specialist) while serving in Active Reserve units; b. was awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Armed Forces Reserve Medal, Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008315

    Original file (20080008315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After his tour ended, he returned to the States. The applicant served in Vietnam for 25 months as an infantryman with an infantry unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by reaffirming his general under honorable conditions characterization of service as earlier upgraded and affirmed by the Army Discharge Review Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015023

    Original file (20090015023.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his 30 April 1992 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his service in Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, and Southwest Asia and all awards and decorations to which he may be entitled for these duty assignments. The applicant provides * DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records) dated 15 August 2009, 9 September 2009, and 11 September 2009 * Military Service Data documentation * DD Forms 214 for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002659

    Original file (20080002659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was promoted to Master Sergeant, E-8. By letter dated 8 April 1977, USAEREC informed the applicant that an Army Standby Enlisted Advisory Board reviewed his records and determined he should be barred from reenlistment under the QMP. It appears that a 10-year old Article 15 would have been a valid consideration in determining who would be recommended for a HQDA bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004090C070206

    Original file (20050004090C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Meritorious Service Medal. The applicant’s record contains a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Award), dated 19 July 1990, which shows the applicant was authorized the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 29 February 1968,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005955

    Original file (20080005955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's several DA Forms 20 do not show award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. XXX _______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011656

    Original file (20140011656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence in his records of any court-martial convictions, personnel actions, or statements that would justify disqualification for the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 25 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017779

    Original file (20140017779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, he participated in five campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to a silver service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 ending on 20 July 1974 to show this service star. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009009

    Original file (20080009009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided statements from a former combat medic with the 82nd Airborne in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant states that he was wounded while engaged in enemy activity in Vietnam and that he was treated by a medic.