Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013907
Original file (20090013907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  28 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013907 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that during a mortar attack on Landing Zone English he was hit by shrapnel.  He explains that while running to the bunker on 5 April 1970, he was hit with shrapnel on the back of his left hand and in the lower back. He states that he removed the metal pieces from his hand and back and cleaned the wounds himself.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his 14 June 1971 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), and two statements from fellow Soldiers.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  Records show the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 April 1968.  He served in Vietnam from 28 June 1969 to 25 June 1970.  He was honorably released from active duty on 14 June 1971.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not list the Purple Heart as an authorized award.  Additionally, the applicant's 
DD Form 215 shows he is authorized award of the Bronze Star Medal it does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

4.  The two supporting statements that were written by fellow Soldiers indicated that a mortar attack occurred on 5 April 1970.  Both Soldiers stated that the applicant sustained wounds from mortar fragments in his hand and back.  They also stated the applicant continued to perform his duties in spite of his wounds.

5.  Item 40 (Wounds) on the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows no entries of any wounds received.  

6.  There is no documentation in the available records which shows the applicant sustained wounds or was treated for wounds incurred as a result of hostile action.

7.  There is no evidence or any general orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart and his name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There are no general orders available which awarded the applicant the Purple Heart.  There are no medical records available which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam.  There is no reason to doubt the statements provided by fellow Soldiers who witnessed the mortar attack, however, without medical evidence corroborating that the applicant was wounded, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  ___x_____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013907



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013907



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013735

    Original file (20080013735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he received shrapnel wounds while serving in Vietnam but he did not receive the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017900

    Original file (20110017900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Purple Heart requires: * a wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records * official orders awarding the decoration 3. The applicant’s service medical records are not available. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a second award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004078

    Original file (20130004078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states treatment of his wounds should be in his military medical records. The applicant's complete military medical records are not available for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011760

    Original file (20060011760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) that he be awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's new argument, as stated in his request, is that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in 1967, in Phu Bai, Vietnam, during a mortar attack. However, there is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he sustained a wound in 1967, in Vietnam, during a mortar...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006665

    Original file (20090006665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements and photographs provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811

    Original file (20140004811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided the following documents: a. a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back. Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003891

    Original file (20090003891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he earned the Purple Heart while he was serving in Vietnam by being wounded during an enemy mortar attack. A review of the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain evidence that the applicant was ever wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019060

    Original file (20130019060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His Official Military Personnel File does not contain any documentation indicating he was wounded in action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. A supporting statement from a former Soldier (name illegible), dated 17 June 2011, shows the former Soldier stated he served in the applicant's squad.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012386

    Original file (20140012386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * two self-authored statements * DD Form 214 * four statements from former Soldiers * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 27 December 2011, with VA medical record extracts * Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 2317, dated 5 March 1970 * Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 5071, dated 7 May 1970 * Headquarters, 101st Airborne...