Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811
Original file (20140004811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  4 November 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140004811 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states he didn't receive a Purple Heart during his term of service and he was informed he had earned the medal.  He was assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division.  He was hit [by shrapnel] and his friend was killed on 10 May 1969.  His medic was Dr. J----.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a self-authored statement, two letters of support, and a personal letter.  

4.  On 25 April 2014, he provided additional documents to include a letter of support and photographs of his lower back to show wounds.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 November 1968.  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was hospitalized in a patient status at Madigan General Hospital, from 27 February to 20 March 1969
* item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in Vietnam from 16 April 1969 through 7 June 1970 
* item 40 (Wounds), no entries
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations), no listing of award of the Purple Heart

4.  His service record includes Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, Special Orders Number 170, dated 19 June 1969, which show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

5.  His service record does not contain orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  The Vietnam casualty roster does not list his name.

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 June 1970.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

7.  He provided a self-authored statement in which he stated he served four months in Vietnam during 1969 to 1970.  He spent most of that time with the U.S. Army Infantry Division.  On 10 May 1969, while serving with the Company A, 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, they were involved in a firefight.  Private First Class (PFC) R.E.B. was killed and he was struck in the back by shrapnel from a rocket-propelled grenade launcher.  He sustained cuts and a significant burn and he was treated with a field dressing.  The injury became infected and required treatment for about a month.  All of this time was spent in the field under the care of the medic.  He was told at the time that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart, but he never received it.  Even though he minimized the injury so his parents wouldn't worry, it was nonetheless an injury worthy of the Purple Heart recognition.  

8.  He provided the following documents:

	a.  a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back.  

   b.  a letter, dated 24 January 2002, in which a former fellow Soldier stated he served with Company A, 1st Platoon 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry Regiment for the whole year of 1969.  In May [1969] in a ground action against hostile forces of the North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong, R.E.B. was killed and the applicant was wounded in the process of trying to help recover R.E.B.'s body.  The applicant's wounds consisted of fragments of shrapnel in the back.  The applicant served as a machine gunner in his squad.  He was the applicant's sergeant and assumed he had received his Purple Heart.  He recently reunited with some of the members he served with and it was brought to his attention that the applicant never received a Purple Heart for wounds he received in combat.  

	c.  an affidavit, dated 23 January 2014, in which a former fellow Soldier stated he served with the applicant in Company A, 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry Regiment in Vietnam in 1969.  They were involved in a firefight in May [1969] when the applicant was hit by shrapnel.  He helped the applicant to remove his gear then removed the burning metal from his lower back.  The medic, J.J., treated the applicant with a field dressing.  

	d.  a letter, dated 25 April 2014, in which a former fellow Soldier stated he served his tour in Vietnam as a medic from March 1969 through February 1970 while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 28th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division.  During this timeframe, they were involved in numerous encounters with hostile forces of North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong.  After serving, he was not fortunate enough to stay in contact with any of the men he served with until the end of 2013 when a fellow platoon member located him and shared his address and phone number with the applicant.  The applicant contacted him and asked if he recalled his injury during the hostile action of 10 May 1969.  Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties.  The applicant's injury appeared to heal adequately.  

9.  His service record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 22 April 2002, which amended his DD Form 214 to add award of the Air Medal.  

10.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's service record is void of medical documentation which confirms he was injured by shrapnel in his back and was treated by a medic.  

2.  His service record is void of evidence which indicates he sustained this injury as the result of hostile action.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.

3.  By regulation, in order to award the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

4.  The letters of support provided by the applicant were carefully considered; however, these statements alone are insufficient as a basis to grant him award of the Purple Heart.

5.  In the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and the treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis upon which to award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ____________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004811





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140004811



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012386

    Original file (20140012386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * two self-authored statements * DD Form 214 * four statements from former Soldiers * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 27 December 2011, with VA medical record extracts * Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 2317, dated 5 March 1970 * Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 5071, dated 7 May 1970 * Headquarters, 101st Airborne...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007785

    Original file (20120007785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submits an Army buddy statement, dated 26 September 2011, from a fellow Soldier at the time in question who attests: * He served with the applicant in Vietnam from February 1968 to February 1969 * They were in the same company and platoon for the entire year * He (fellow Soldier) received the CIB * Their company performed numerous combat assaults in Vietnam * The applicant spent well over 300 days in the field/jungle during their tour * The applicant earned the CIB within the first 4 days...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000369

    Original file (20130000369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows not indicate he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart; however, neither his available record nor the Vietnam casualty roster or ADCARS provide any evidence that shows he was wounded during his period of service in the Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071357C070402

    Original file (2002071357C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. While the Board has no reason to doubt the applicant’s statement that he was in fact wounded, documentary evidence is required to correct a military record. However these statements and the other submitted unofficial documents are not sufficient by themselves as a basis for award of the Purple Heart in view of evidence of record which shows the applicant was not wounded and was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072406C070403

    Original file (2002072406C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the Purple Heart for a friendly fire injury he received in combat in Vietnam. While the Board has no reason to doubt the applicant’s statement that he was in fact wounded, documentary evidence is required to correct a military record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003103

    Original file (20110003103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He requests, through his Congressional representative, reconsideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision denying him the award of the Purple Heart. The service medical treatment record, provided by the applicant, indicates that on 5 July 1969 he was treated for a puncture wound on the bottom of his right foot and had sand debris in the wound.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011918

    Original file (20140011918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart as an authorized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087775C070212

    Original file (2003087775C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The Board has determined that the applicant has met the regulatory requirements for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 April 1965 through 1 April 1968; therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Based on the applicant’s dates of service in Vietnam, Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002581

    Original file (20140002581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he is in total disagreement with the Board's decision and is requesting reconsideration of the Board's decision * he is not seeking to be glorified by this award; he is seeking the citation for which it was meant * he feels that he submitted the required evidence to validate his application in the previous record of proceedings (ROP) * he regrets that his sergeant in charge felt it unnecessary to document his injuries or have them checked by medical...