Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013735
Original file (20080013735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	        20 November 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013735 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he received shrapnel wounds while serving in Vietnam but he did not receive the Purple Heart.  He contends that in May 1968 he was wounded in his left arm, face, and left hand during mortar attacks.

3.  The applicant provides a Report of Consultation, dated 18 November 1971; a Report of Operation, dictated on 19 November 1971; an undated eyewitness statement from a fellow Soldier at the time in question; and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted on 21 October 1966 for a period of 3 years.  He served as an artilleryman in Vietnam from 28 January 1968 through 27 August 1969 and was released from active duty on 28 August 1969. 

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.   

4.  There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

6.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided a 1971 Report of Consultation which states, in pertinent part, that he [the applicant] “states that he received shrapnel wounds 2 1/2 yrs. [years] ago in Vietnam” to his left index finger.  He provided a 1971 Report of Operation which shows that “fragment” was removed from his left hand.  

7.  The applicant also provided an eyewitness statement from a fellow Soldier at the time in question.  He attests that in May 1968 bullet fragments hit the applicant in the back of his shoulder during a massive ground attack.  He also states that in July 1968 the applicant received shrapnel in his left hand and head during a mortar attack.   

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  The 1971 medical documentation provided by the applicant does not show that the “fragment” in his left hand was the result of hostile action in Vietnam.  In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.  
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  _____X___  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013735



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013735



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013907

    Original file (20090013907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both Soldiers stated that the applicant sustained wounds from mortar fragments in his hand and back. There are no medical records available which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam. There is no reason to doubt the statements provided by fellow Soldiers who witnessed the mortar attack, however, without medical evidence corroborating that the applicant was wounded, there is an insufficient basis for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024931

    Original file (20100024931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart during his period of service in Vietnam. Despite that there are no orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his former unit commander and a former service member confirmed the applicant was struck by shrapnel from a mortar round on 14 May 1969, in Vietnam, as a result of hostile action and received treatment by medical authorities. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071593C070402

    Original file (2002071593C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his claim for award of the Purple Heart, the applicant provided Department of Veterans Affairs documentation which shows that service connection was granted for multiple shrapnel wounds. He states that “When Comrade [applicant’s last name] was wounded in battle, I recall that one of our Medics had administered treatment out in the field of Comrade [applicant’s last name] shrapnel wounds.” The applicant also provided an eyewitness statement, dated 28 February 2002, from a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008220

    Original file (20120008220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The Purple Heart requires: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018410

    Original file (20130018410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision promulgated in Docket Number AR20120015020, dated 28 February 2013, wherein he requested award of the Purple Heart. His record is void of any official Army documentation that shows he was wounded, his wounds were the result of hostile action, were treated by medical personnel, or that such treatment was made part of the official record. Unfortunately, neither that attack...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011257

    Original file (20120011257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service medical records are not available for review with this case and there is no evidence in his available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action while serving in Vietnam. The applicant provides: a. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity or the sincerity of his former unit members, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis upon which to award the applicant the Purple Heart in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017178

    Original file (20140017178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, he requests: * award of the Purple Heart for wounds received during his service in the Republic of Vietnam * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart * correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5, vice specialist four (SP4)/E-4 2. The applicant states: * in March 1970, he was setting up Landing Zone (LZ) Caroline when the unit came...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...