Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004078
Original file (20130004078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  24 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004078 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart for injuries he sustained in Vietnam and Cambodia.

2.  The applicant states that his armored personnel carrier (APC) became entangled in foliage and he could not see where he was driving.  When he opened the turret of his vehicle, he was severely cut on his left arm by a Viet Cong.  One of his crewmembers handed him a pistol and he shot the Viet Cong off his APC.  An Army of the Republic of Vietnam medic sewed his wound.

3.  On three different occasions, his tank was mined or under mortar fire.  The applicant states he had shrapnel removed from his body.  The operations were performed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals in Memphis, TN, and Jackson, MS.  The applicant further states treatment of his wounds should be in his military medical records.

4.  The applicant provides:

* self-authored statement
* self-authored statement, subject:  Specifics of Effects of Vietnam Experience Related to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
* spouse's statement, subject:  Statements Regarding How Claimed Disabilities Have Affected Me
* letter of support
* DD Form 47 (Record of Induction)
* Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device Citation
* excerpt from The Blackhorse magazine
* two photographs showing a scar on his arm
* seven photographs of him in the field
* three documents from the VA
* Military Assistance Command Vietnam Form 270 (Malaria Debriefing)
* medical documents from Wren Laser and Skin Care Center
* medical document from D-PATH Dermatopathology

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 August 1969.  He successfully completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist).

3.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 31 January 1970 and he was assigned to Troop B, 1st Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, on 2 February 1970.  On 12 February 1971, he was reassigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 3rd Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment.

4.  On 20 March 1971, the applicant departed Vietnam.  He was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee on 24 March 1971 after completing 1 year, 7 months, and 6 days of creditable active service.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded Purple Heart.

6.  Item 39 (Identifying Body Marks, Scars, Tattoos) of the applicant's Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 24 March 1971, shows no abnormalities.

7.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the applicant was wounded in action and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart.

8.  The applicant's complete military medical records are not available for review.

9.  There are no general orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.  There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded in action or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.

10.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.

11.  The applicant provided two photographs that show a scar on his arm.

12.  The applicant provides an undated self-authored statement in which he states he was injured in Vietnam and Cambodia on the following dates:

* 25 January 1970, he was wounded by shrapnel after his tank hit a mine
* 8 June 1970, he sustained a head injury when his APC hit a mine
* 16 June 1970, he sustained a 6-inch laceration to his arm by a Viet Cong
* 19 June 1970, he was wounded by shrapnel after a mortar attack

13.  The applicant provided a citation for award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device that states the commander of his vehicle was hit by shrapnel on 19 June 1970.  The applicant jumped from the vehicle to get a medic and was knocked from his feet by the blast of incoming rounds.  After he brought a medic back to his vehicle, he continued to fire with a machine gun until the contact was over.

14.  The applicant provided a VA letter, dated 30 July 1971, which shows he was awarded 10-percent disability for malaria.  He was not granted service- connected disability for his left forearm.

15.  The applicant provided statements from his spouse and a fellow associate who state the applicant suffers from many ailments due to his military service.

16.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required medical treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.

2.  The applicant provided several medical documents and photographs of his arm.  Unfortunately, there is no evidence in the available records and he has not provided any evidence that shows his injury was the direct result of hostile action.
Although he contends, in part, that he sustained a 6-inch laceration to his arm as a result of enemy action, his separation physical does not note any scars.

3.  In order to support award of the Purple Heart, the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action.  The member must have required medical treatment by military medical personnel and this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

4.  The applicant's records contain no medical treatment records or other documents that confirm he was wounded as a result of enemy action or treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in Vietnam or Cambodia.  As a result, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been met.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      ___________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004078



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004078



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003241

    Original file (20120003241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was injured by hostile military actions while on convoy with the 2nd Squadron, 1st Cavalry in October or November of 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant provides as new evidence a witness statement and four photographs which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR and warrant consideration by the Board. The witness statement he provides details the incident that resulted in the applicant's injury and he provides photographs that show his arm was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009285

    Original file (20140009285.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the Purple Heart is not listed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) even though he was wounded during his combat service in Vietnam. He stated that the applicant joined Company D on 27 March 1971 and served with it, taking part in the ground combat operations, until the unit was redeployed to the continental United States on 17 August 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811

    Original file (20140004811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided the following documents: a. a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back. Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076212C070215

    Original file (2002076212C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for actions on 19-20 June 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024497

    Original file (20110024497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of evidence to show he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for such wounds, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018128

    Original file (20080018128.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. On 31 January 2007, a former Soldier of the applicant's unit wrote that when he had arrived in the unit, the applicant had been wounded earlier but was back with the unit as an APC driver. e. On 9 March 2007, the applicant's former company commander wrote a letter stating that the applicant was a driver of an APC. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002864

    Original file (20090002864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Even the applicant's former first sergeant only stated that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001009

    Original file (20150001009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in combat. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 June 1965 and he held military occupational specialty 11B (light weapons infantryman). There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of a punji stick, received treatment, and that treatment was made a matter of official record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006035

    Original file (20080006035.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005920

    Original file (20120005920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments) – assignments in the 25th Infantry Division and the 720th Military Police Battalion between 13 September 1970 and 29 August 1971 when he returned to the United States for separation and transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve as a specialist four (pay grade E-4); b. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Bronze Star Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign...