Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010143
Original file (20090010143.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090010143 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 2 June 1995 to show completion of the Practical Nurse Course, Phases I and II.

2.  The applicant states that this training should be included on his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 and DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for Phase I and II of the Practical Nurse Course.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 214, ending on 2 June 1995, shows that he served on active duty for training (ADT) as a United States Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier from 4 April to 2 June 1995.  During this period of active service he completed the Patient Administration Specialist Course which is appropriately shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The DA Form 1059, dated 1 October 1995, that the applicant provided shows his performance was evaluated during Phase I of the Practical Nurse Course from 9 July to 30 September 1995.  He achieved course standards.  This was nonresident training.

4.  The DA Form 1059, dated 1 February 1996, that the applicant provided shows his performance was evaluated during Phase II of the Practical Nurse Course from 1 October 1995 to 31 January 1996.  He achieved course standards.  This was nonresident training.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his Practical Nurse training.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 was issued on 2 June 1995 and the applicant began and completed the subject training after his release from ADT.  Therefore, the nonresident, Practical Nurse training is not authorized to be entered on his DD Form 214. 

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X__  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010143



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090010143



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003383

    Original file (20120003383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 14 (Military Education) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed Phase I and Phase II of the military occupational specialty (MOS) 91C (Practical Nurse) Course. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011277

    Original file (20090011277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 9 (Type of Report) on his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 24 August 1979, be corrected to show "Resident" instead of "Nonresident." He states that only a resident course could be completed in 2 weeks. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant's DA Form 1059 shows he completed the 2-week Phase II of the IOAC at the USAR School at Fort Benning, Georgia on 24 August 1979 which is resident training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014543

    Original file (20080014543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show she was awarded three Army Achievement Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. The evidence shows the applicant was awarded two Army Achievement Medals in the period covered by her DD Form 214 and was recommended for a third award; however, there is insufficient evidence to show that after the battalion commander approved the recommendation for an additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059264C070421

    Original file (2001059264C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he completed a 10-week medical specialist course in 1999. The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his release from ADT shows that he completed a 10-week medical specialist course in 1999 and a 6-week practical nurse course in 2000. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was released from the practical nurse course after he failed four major exams.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018079

    Original file (20140018079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * amend the primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) shown in item 11 (Primary Specialty) from 68W3O (Health Care Specialist) to 68W3OM6 (Health Care Specialist with additional skill identifier (ASI) for practical/vocational nurse) * change the years and months shown for his PMOS * remove the entry in item 14 (Military Education) showing attendance at Practical Nurse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065911C070421

    Original file (2001065911C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Informal coordination with the staff of the Promotions and Notifications Branch, Office of Reserve Components Promotions, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) revealed that the applicant was considered, but was not selected, for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the 1999 (8 September 1999) RCSB because he did not meet military education requirements. The Board notes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013357

    Original file (20140013357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show completion of the Practical Nurse Course. Acceptable source documents include the enlisted record brief, DA Form 4037 (Officer Record Brief), DA Form 1059, or other military issued certificate of completion with from and through dates or number of weeks. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019112

    Original file (20140019112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * An upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge * Restoration of his rank/pay grade to specialist (SPC)/E-4 * Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show completion of the 91C course * A personal hearing 2. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 ending on 19 March 1997 * DA Form 458 (Charge Sheet) * DA Form 4856 (General Counseling Form) * Statement from a sergeant * Printout regarding variable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003518

    Original file (20090003518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for his attendance at the U.S. Army Sergeants Major Academy (USASMA) Non-Resident Course (NRC) during the period 1 April 2006 to 20 June 2008 from his official military personnel file (OMPF). On 10 April 2007, the applicant requested to withdraw from the USASMA NRC. He was academically deficient and he was not making sufficient progress toward successful completion of Phase 1 of the course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063421C070421

    Original file (2001063421C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 August 1996, the applicant requested transfer to the USAR and on 9 October 1996 he enlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-4. Orders dated 3 May 1999 ordered the applicant to active duty in an AGR status with a report date of 14 June 1999 to the 671 st Float Bridge Company in Portland, OR. Paragraph 8-2e states that a SGT must be a graduate of the PLDC Active Army (PLDC-AC) or the PLDC Reserve Component (PLDC-RC).