Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059264C070421
Original file (2001059264C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 24 January 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001059264


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deyon D. Battle Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. George D. Paxson Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Richard T. Dunbar Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his primary military occupational specialty (MOS) as 91B10 (medical specialist) instead of 91C10 (practical nurse) as currently reflected.

3. The applicant states that he completed a 10-week medical specialist course in 1999. He states that on 8 September 2000 he was academically removed from phase II of the practical nursing course and, therefore, he should have been awarded a 91B10 MOS.

4. The applicant's military records are unavailable for review. Information herein was obtained from alternate sources.

5. The available information shows that on 22 September 1998, he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve for 8 years in the pay grade of E-1.

6. The applicant was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 28 July 1999.

7. Orders were published on 4 February 2000, relieving him from Headquarters United States Army Medical Department Center and School, Fort Sam Houston, Texas and attaching him to the Student Detachment, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas, effective 18 February 2000, for a period of 46 weeks or until completion of 91C10 (practical nurse) Class I-00 Phase II, MOS training. The orders indicate that the starting date for the course was 6 March 2000 and the closing date was 2 February 2001.

8. On 8 September 2000, as a result of failing four major exams, the applicant was relieved from the practical nurse course.

9. The applicant was released from ADT on 4 October 2000, after he completed 1 year, 2 months and 7 days of total active service. The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his release from ADT shows that he completed a
10-week medical specialist course in 1999 and a 6-week practical nurse course in 2000. Item number 11 on his DD Form 214 shows his primary specialty as 91C10 and that he performed duties as a practical nurse for 0 years and 0 months.

10. Army Regulation 611-201 provides, in pertinent part, that in order to be awarded a 91C10 MOS an individual must be able to perform the duties of a 91B10.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. An administrative error was made during the preparation of the applicant’s DD Form 214, which resulted in the incorrect primary specialty being reflected.
2. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was released from the practical nurse course after he failed four major exams.

3. In order for him to have been enrolled in the practical nurse course, he had to have successfully completed a basic medical specialist course. Therefore, medical specialist was his primary specialty while he was on active duty and his DD Form 214 should have been annotated accordingly.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned to show his primary specialty as 91B10, medical specialist.

BOARD VOTE:

___rtd __ ____gp__ __wtm___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____George D. Paxson_____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001059264
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/01/24
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0000 1021
2. 100.0500 6.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100764C070208

    Original file (04100764C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 635-5 provides instructions for the preparation of the DD Form 214, and states in effect that information for completion of item 11 (primary specialty) will be obtained from the ERB (enlisted record brief), entering the titles of all MOS served for at least 1 year and include for each MOS the number of years and months served. The Board also recommends denial of so much...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070091C070402

    Original file (2002070091C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he has not been promoted even though he met all the requirements contained in the regulation. He submits with his request a memorandum from his commanding officer requesting that he be promoted, a copy of DD Form 1966 series (Record of Military Processing), a copy of his enlistment document (DD Form 4 series), a copy of DA Form 3286-64 (Statement for Enlistment), a copy of DA Form 3286-68 (Statement for Enlistment – Civilian Acquired Skills Enlistment Program), a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199711631

    Original file (199711631.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the documents she submits with her application show that she should have been promoted to pay grade E-5 in September 1992. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army Reserve for eight years in pay grade E-1 on 29 May 1990. Her enlistment documents show that she enlisted for MOS 91C, licensed practical nurse, an authorized medical skill enlistment option under the specialized training for Army Reserve Readiness (STARR) enlistment program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 199711631C070209

    Original file (199711631C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the documents she submits with her application show that she should have been promoted to pay grade E-5 in September 1992. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army Reserve for eight years in pay grade E-1 on 29 May 1990. Her enlistment documents show that she enlisted for MOS 91C, licensed practical nurse, an authorized medical skill enlistment option under the specialized training for Army Reserve Readiness (STARR) enlistment program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066732C070402

    Original file (2002066732C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her application, she submits a course completion certificate, dated 26 October 1999, for the Medical Specialist Sustainment Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 91B10 correspondence course; a completion certificate for the Driver’s Training Academy HMMWV Operator’s Course; a Memorandum for Record pertaining to completion of a Suture Certification Course, dated 18 September 1998; a diploma from the Eastern College of Health Vocations for completion of the course of study in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060935C070421

    Original file (2001060935C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The first contested NCOER, for the rating period February through October 1998, was a change of rater report when the applicant departed Redstone Arsenal, AL for Europe. The applicant was rated as a 91B. That the applicant’s NCOER for the period ending October 1998, Part IVb be amended to delete the comment “failed to retake the 91C licensure exam and did not notify his chain of command after promising that he would take it” and to change the rating from “Needs Some Improvement” to “Success.”

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064522C070421

    Original file (2001064522C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion also states that the applicant was enlisted in pay grade E-3 on 21 May 2001 in error and should have entered on active duty in the rank of SPC based on Table 7-1 of Army Regulation 601-210. It states, in pertinent part, that personnel who enlist the ACASP in MOS 91C will be enlisted in the pay grade of E-4 with subsequent promotion to the pay grade of E-5 provided they meet the established requirements of the regulation. In accordance with Chapter 7 of Army Regulation 601-210,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063421C070421

    Original file (2001063421C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 August 1996, the applicant requested transfer to the USAR and on 9 October 1996 he enlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-4. Orders dated 3 May 1999 ordered the applicant to active duty in an AGR status with a report date of 14 June 1999 to the 671 st Float Bridge Company in Portland, OR. Paragraph 8-2e states that a SGT must be a graduate of the PLDC Active Army (PLDC-AC) or the PLDC Reserve Component (PLDC-RC).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018079

    Original file (20140018079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * amend the primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) shown in item 11 (Primary Specialty) from 68W3O (Health Care Specialist) to 68W3OM6 (Health Care Specialist with additional skill identifier (ASI) for practical/vocational nurse) * change the years and months shown for his PMOS * remove the entry in item 14 (Military Education) showing attendance at Practical Nurse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014543

    Original file (20080014543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show she was awarded three Army Achievement Medals and two Army Commendation Medals. The evidence shows the applicant was awarded two Army Achievement Medals in the period covered by her DD Form 214 and was recommended for a third award; however, there is insufficient evidence to show that after the battalion commander approved the recommendation for an additional...