Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007178
Original file (20090007178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	         9 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007178 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his reentry (RE) code from RE-4 to RE-3.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he is a divorced man and has a new life with two beautiful children.  He also states that he would like to serve his country again and provide for fiancé and children.  He concludes that he is not gay.

3.  The applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a copy of his divorce decree, and two copies of birth certificates in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army, on 30 April 1996, for a period of 3 years.  

3.  On 1 July 1998, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to go to his appointed place of duty on 17 June 1998.  His imposed punishment was 14 days additional duty.

4.  The applicant's record also shows he was given ten general counseling statements during the period 10 October 1996 through 1 July 1998, for various reasons including his initial counseling, failure to report, admitted use of illegal drugs, and repeated failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test.

5.  The applicant's record contains a Sworn Statement, dated 8 July 1998, which shows the applicant divulged to his platoon sergeant that he was being blackmailed by his former homosexual friend and that he had been participating in homosexual acts for the last 2 or 3 months. 

6.  On 24 August 1998, the applicant was notified by his unit commander that separation action was being initiated on him under the provisions of chapter 
15-3b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Homosexual Conduct, with an honorable discharge.    

7.  On 26 August 1998, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the proposed action against him and consulted with legal counsel.  He was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action, the effects of such a separation, the rights available to him, and the effect of any action taken by him in waiving his rights.  Subsequent to receiving this counseling, the applicant completed his election of rights by waiving his right to have his case considered by an administrative separation board, and declined to submit statements in his own behalf.  

8.  On 29 August 1998, the applicant’s commander forwarded his recommendation to the next higher authority.

9.  On 3 September 1998, the separation authority approved the discharge action and directed issuance of an honorable discharge.

10.  On 14 September 1998, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 15-3b, by reason of Homosexuality (Admission).  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms that he held the rank of private/E-3 (PFC) and completed a total of 2 years, 4 months, and 15 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 also shows that based on the authority and reason for his separation, he was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JRB and an RE code of 4.  

11.  The applicant submitted two birth certificates for his children and the applicant submitted a copy of his divorce decree.

12.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets for the basic policy for the separation of enlisted personnel.  It provides, in pertinent part, that homosexuality is incompatible with military service.  The presence in the military environment of persons who engage in homosexual conduct or who, by their statements, demonstrate a tendency to engage in homosexual conduct, seriously impairs the accomplishment of the military mission.  Paragraph 15-3b provides the criteria for separation.  It states that the basis for separation may include pre-service, prior service, or current service conduct or statements.  A member will be separated if the member has stated that he or she is a homosexual or bisexual, unless there is a further finding that the member is not a homosexual or bisexual. 

13.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) the covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.  RE-4 applies to persons who are permanently disqualified for continued Army service.

14.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of JRB is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers who separated under the provisions of paragraph 15-3b of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Homosexual Admission.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table stipulates that the appropriate RE code assignment for the SPD code of JRB is RE code 4. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence in the applicant’s record that shows he was threatened, coerced, or intimated into admitting that he was homosexual.  There is no evidence in his record nor did the applicant state that he was told to admit to being a homosexual.  

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation.  RE-4 applies to persons who are permanently disqualified for continued Army service.  By regulation, the RE-4 code assigned to the applicant was the proper code to assign members separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15-3b for Homosexuality (Admission).  This includes the assignment of 
his SPD and RE codes.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were protected throughout the separation process.  As a result, the RE-4 code was and is still appropriate.  

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005464





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007178



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089486C070403

    Original file (2003089486C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He states that he could not deal with his marital problems while in the Army and this affected his military duties. Paragraph 15-3b, provides for the separation of members based on an admission of homosexuality.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010281

    Original file (20100010281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code of "4" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 29 June 2007, be changed to an RE "3," "2" or "1" so that he may be eligible to reenter the Army. The commander stated in Part III (Summary of Counseling) that he was counseling the applicant on the definitions of "Bisexual," "Homosexual," "Sexual Orientation," and "Homosexual Conduct," which included a homosexual act, a statement of homosexuality, and/or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008375

    Original file (20070008375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of JRB is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers who separated under the provisions of paragraph 15-3b of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Homosexual Admission. There is no evidence in his record nor did the applicant state in his self-authored statement that he was told to admit to being a homosexual to be with his father. By regulation, the RE-4 code assigned to the applicant was the proper code to assign members separating under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011616

    Original file (20100011616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the narrative reason for separation shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the character of discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service. The applicant's narrative reason for separation was assigned based on the fact he was discharged under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006930

    Original file (20080006930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. An SPD code of "JRB" applies to persons discharged for homosexual conduction or admission under the provisions of Chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 4 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006488

    Original file (20090006488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. She stated she was requesting to be discharged from the U.S. Army under chapter 15, paragraph 4. On 6 April 1993, the applicant's commander recommended her for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexuality.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012853

    Original file (20100012853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, her DD Form 214 shows she was discharged on 18 September 2009, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 15-3b, for homosexual admission. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary discharge when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019671

    Original file (20080019671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE code 4 to RE code 3. It also shows SPD codes with their corresponding RE codes. In view of the fact that the applicant did not specifically request a correction to item 12a of his DD Form 214, this error will not be corrected at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018885

    Original file (20130018885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior policies. The memorandum states that effective 20 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007517

    Original file (20090007517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She believed she had no option except to get out of the Army with what was happening between her friend's situation and the first sergeant and other Soldiers harassing her. The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is a homosexual admission and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b. Although the applicant's discharge proceedings...