Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007517
Original file (20090007517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  6 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007517 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3 or lower.  

2.  The applicant states, in part, that her life in the Army started to get complicated when her first sergeant started to make unwanted advances towards her.  She told him to stop harassing her several times but he persisted.  She states the work environment became very hostile so she filed a complaint with the Judge Advocate General (JAG) and an investigation started immediately.  She argues that after the investigation started, all the rumors started and the pressure became unbearable.  

3.  The applicant states that as the situation was unfolding, another situation with a fellow Soldier, who was her friend, developed.  Her friend tried to commit suicide but the unit did not offer any assistance.  She believed she had no option except to get out of the Army with what was happening between her friend's situation and the first sergeant and other Soldiers harassing her.  She heard that the fastest way to get out was to tell them she was homosexual and that is why she approached her commander and requested to be separated.  The applicant concludes that she is not gay or bisexual and requests her RE code be changed so she can reenlist.

4.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and three third-party statements in support of this application. 


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 April 2000 and upon completion of initial entry training was awarded military occupational specialty 96B (Intelligence Analyst).  

3.  The applicant's discharge proceedings are not available for review.  However, her DD Form 214 shows she was discharged on 16 August 2001, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 
15-3b, for homosexual admission.  Her character of service is shown as honorable.  She was given a separation program designator (SPD) code of JRB and an RE code of 4.

4.  The applicant stated that she filed a complaint with the JAG; however, the investigation proceedings and/or findings are not available for review. 

5.  The applicant provided three third-party statements which recommend the applicant be allowed to reenlist in the Army.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, states that homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the Army.  A Soldier will be discharged when the Soldier has made a statement that he/she is a homosexual or bisexual, or words to that effect, unless there is a further approved finding that the Soldier 
has demonstrated that he/she is not a person who engages in, attempts to engage in, has a propensity to engage in, or intends to engage in homosexual acts.

7.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the Reserve. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment.  This chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  This regulation further provides that RE codes may only be changed if they are determined to be administratively incorrect.

   a.  RE–4 applies to persons not qualified for continued service because they were separated from the service with a non-waivable disqualification such as conviction and sentence of a court martial.

	b.  RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and personnel who are discharged, but the disqualification is waivable.

	c.  RE-1 applies to persons completing their term of service (ETS) who are considered qualified to reenter the Army, so long as all other qualifications are met.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is a homosexual admission and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b.

9.  The Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that when the SPD is JRB then an RE code of 4 will be given.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that her RE code be changed so she may reenlist.

2.  Although the applicant's discharge proceedings and the JAG investigation findings are not available, she admitted to her commander that she was a homosexual in order to be expeditiously separated.  Accordingly, she was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b, because of her homosexual admission.  The applicant did not provide evidence which shows that any requirements of law and regulation were not met or that her rights were not fully protected throughout the separation process.  

3.  The fact the applicant now contends that her admission about being a homosexual was made in a state of desperation was noted and her desire to serve her country again as a Soldier is noteworthy.  However, the applicant's contentions do not change the reason for her discharge.

4.  The applicant's contention that she had no options except to get out of the Army due to the unbearable situations she was facing was also noted.  However, there is no evidence showing she ever sought assistance from outside command channels, such as the office of the chaplain or the equal opportunity channels, and the results of the JAG investigation are not available.  

5.  The applicant's RE code is based on her reason for discharge and cannot be changed unless the applicant's narrative reason for separation is changed.  Her narrative reason for separation was based on her homosexual admission and there is no basis upon which to change the reason for separation.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007517



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007517



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012853

    Original file (20100012853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, her DD Form 214 shows she was discharged on 18 September 2009, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 15-3b, for homosexual admission. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The regulation shows that the SPD of JRB as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary discharge when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017218

    Original file (20140017218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under "Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT)" or prior policies. Her record is void of any...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006649

    Original file (AR20090006649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-2, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission and the desire to commit homosexual acts, with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation Notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant's discharge, the Board found that someone in the discharge process...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004980

    Original file (20090004980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2008, the company commander counseled the applicant concerning the Army's homosexual policy and separation under chapter 15, Army Regulation 635-200. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The commander investigated the applicant's sworn statement and confirmed that the homosexual acts did occur.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016363

    Original file (AR20130016363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. The service record indicates that on 16 June 2003, the unit commander...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008474

    Original file (20130008474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004673

    Original file (AR20130004673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason of the applicant’s discharge to “Secretarial Authority,” under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of “JFF,” and a reentry code (RE) of “1.” Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 12 March 2004, the separation authority approved the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03093895C070212

    Original file (03093895C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered active duty on 17 July 2000. Pertinent Army Regulations also provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019671

    Original file (20080019671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE code 4 to RE code 3. It also shows SPD codes with their corresponding RE codes. In view of the fact that the applicant did not specifically request a correction to item 12a of his DD Form 214, this error will not be corrected at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015373

    Original file (20120015373.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9a(1), states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status (i.e., had completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty before the date of the initiation of separation action), except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case. The...