Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011616
Original file (20100011616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011616 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the narrative reason for separation shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  He states, in effect, his DD Form 214 contains an entry which erroneously implies that he is "bisexual" instead of "bipolar."  He contends he is not bisexual; he is bipolar and he has been married to his wife for 20 years.  He concludes the word "bisexual" should not appear on his DD Form 214.

3.  He provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 October 1984 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 91A (Medical Specialist).  The highest rank/pay grade he attained during his military service was private (PV2)/E-2.

3.  On 12 August 1985, he underwent a mental status evaluation due to the fact he was being considered for administrative discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), 
chapter 15 (Separation for Homosexuality).  The Chief of Community Mental Health Services (CMHS), Fort Ord, CA, noted the applicant identified himself as "homosexual."  He stated there was no medical or psychiatric procedure or test which objectively or definitively establishes a person's sexual behavior.  The Chief of CMHS rendered the following observations and opinions regarding the applicant:

* his behavior was normal
* he was fully alert
* he was fully oriented
* his mood and affect were unremarkable
* his thinking process was clear
* his thought content was normal
* his memory was good
* he had the mental capacity to understand and participate in separation proceedings
* he was mentally responsible
* he met medical retention requirements
* he was psychiatrically cleared for any administrative action deemed appropriate by his command

4.  On 22 August 1985, his immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b, by reason of admission of homosexuality.  He acknowledged receipt of the commander's notification on the same day.

5.  On 23 August 1985, he was advised by counsel of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b, for having admitted to being homosexual or bisexual.

6.  On 27 August 1985, his immediate commander initiated separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b, for having admitted to being homosexual or bisexual.

7.  His record contains a DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 4 September 1985, in which he rendered the following statement under oath:

I, [applicant's full name], want it to be known that I am a homosexual, and that I have never under any condition committed homosexual acts with an active duty Soldier.

8.  On 5 September 1985, the separation authority approved the recommended separation action against the applicant in accordance with Army Regulation
635-200, paragraph 15-3b, and directed the issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate.

9.  On 17 September 1985, he was discharged accordingly.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 10 months and 25 days of creditable active service during this period.  The form also contains the following entries:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) contains the entry "Army Regulation
635-200, Paragraph 15-3b"
* item 26 (Separation Code) contains the entry "JRB"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) contains the entry "Admission of homosexuality/bisexuality"

10.  His record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he was diagnosed as bipolar during his period of service.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 15-3b provided that a Soldier could be separated for having admitted to being homosexual or bisexual.

12.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states that the SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty.  The "JRB" SPD code is the correct code for members separating under the provisions of paragraph 15-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 and the narrative reason for separation is "Admission of homosexuality/bisexuality."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions that his DD Form 214 should be corrected by changing the word "bisexual" in his narrative reason for separation to "bipolar" was carefully considered and determined to lack merit.

2.  Evidence shows he voluntarily rendered a sworn statement, wherein he admitted to being a homosexual.

3.  Evidence also shows he underwent a mental status evaluation as part of pre-separation processing and he was not diagnosed with any type of mental disorder. As a result, he was psychiatrically cleared for any administrative action deemed appropriate by his command.

4.  The evidence of record shows his separation action was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations and there is no indication of procedural errors that would have jeopardized his rights.  The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the character of discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.

5.  The applicant's narrative reason for separation was assigned based on the fact he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 15-3b, by reason of admission of homosexuality or bisexuality.  The only valid narrative reason for separation permitted under this paragraph and its corresponding SPD code is "Admission of homosexuality/bisexuality."  Therefore, the required narrative reason for separation was applied to his DD Form 214.

6.  There is no evidence in the available records nor did the applicant provide any evidence that he was diagnosed as bipolar during his period of service or any other reason to warrant a removal of or a change to his narrative reason for separation.

7.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011616



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011616



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008375

    Original file (20070008375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of JRB is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers who separated under the provisions of paragraph 15-3b of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of Homosexual Admission. There is no evidence in his record nor did the applicant state in his self-authored statement that he was told to admit to being a homosexual to be with his father. By regulation, the RE-4 code assigned to the applicant was the proper code to assign members separating under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010281

    Original file (20100010281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code of "4" on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 29 June 2007, be changed to an RE "3," "2" or "1" so that he may be eligible to reenter the Army. The commander stated in Part III (Summary of Counseling) that he was counseling the applicant on the definitions of "Bisexual," "Homosexual," "Sexual Orientation," and "Homosexual Conduct," which included a homosexual act, a statement of homosexuality, and/or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018885

    Original file (20130018885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior policies. The memorandum states that effective 20 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017218

    Original file (20140017218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under "Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT)" or prior policies. Her record is void of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006488

    Original file (20090006488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. She stated she was requesting to be discharged from the U.S. Army under chapter 15, paragraph 4. On 6 April 1993, the applicant's commander recommended her for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 15 for homosexuality.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015373

    Original file (20120015373.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-9a(1), states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status (i.e., had completed no more than 180 days of continuous active duty before the date of the initiation of separation action), except when characterization under other than honorable conditions is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019671

    Original file (20080019671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE code 4 to RE code 3. It also shows SPD codes with their corresponding RE codes. In view of the fact that the applicant did not specifically request a correction to item 12a of his DD Form 214, this error will not be corrected at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015461

    Original file (20130015461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior policies. The memorandum states that, effective 20 September 2011,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019027

    Original file (20130019027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRB's) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NR's) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT or prior...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002391

    Original file (AR20090002391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Separation for Homosexual Admission” and the separation code is "JRB." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...