Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005633
Original file (20090005633.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090005633 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the zip code entered in item 19 (Nearest Relative) of his 1 August 1997 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the zip code listed in item 19 of his 
DD Form 214 is incorrect and should read 33619 instead of 73503.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  On 1 August 1997, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) under provisions of Chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he completed 3 years of active military service and held the rank of private first class (PFC) at the time.  Item 19b contains an address in Tampa, Florida that includes the zip code 73503.

3.  A review of the United States Postal Service (USPS) Zip Code shows the correct zip code for the address listed in item 19b of the applicant's DD Form 214 is 33619-7338.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 of the separation documents regulation contains item-by-item preparation instructions for the DD Form 214.  The instructions for item 19b states, in pertinent part, to enter the address of a relative who will know the Soldier's location and address at all times.  When a relative is not available, use a close friend.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contention that item 19b of his DD Form 214 reflects an incorrect zip code for the address listed was carefully considered and found to have merit. A review of the USPS Zip Code Lookup site shows the correct zip code for the address listed in item 19b of the applicant's DD Form 214 is 33619-7338.  As a result, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 accordingly.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 19b of his DD form 214 by deleting the current zip code listed and by replacing it with the zip code "33619-7338" and by providing him a correction to his DD Form 214 that reflects this change. 




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005633



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005633



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014859

    Original file (20130014859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to: * show his name as "M------, M-----" instead of "C------, J---- E----- JR" * change Block 7b (Home of Record at Time of Entry) to his current address * change Block 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) to a different street address * change Block 19b (Nearest Relative) to a different relative with a different street address 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017710

    Original file (20100017710.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Award and add to item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Combat Action Badge for Iraq and any other awards pertaining to Iraq; and c. Correcting in items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) to read MI for Michigan instead of MD for Maryland. The applicant's separation orders identify him as a PFC. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018619

    Original file (20110018619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. In this case, given the change requested by the applicant has no material effect on his service record and because it must be presumed the name and address listed in item 19b is accurately...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013639

    Original file (20110013639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110013639 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of item 19b (Nearest Relative (Name and Address – Include Zip Code)) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the spelling of the city as "Pennington" instead of "Pemmington." Her service record contains the following documents which show the city and state of her nearest relative (father): * The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006841

    Original file (20140006841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the Legion of Merit was approved after his DD Form 214 was completed and the addresses in items 19a and 19b are incorrect. The available evidence does not support his request for correction of items 19a and 19b of his DD Form 214 to show an address in Ridgeway, South Carolina instead of an address in Montgomery, Louisiana. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007091

    Original file (20080007091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that items 7b (Home of Record at Time of Entry), 19a (Mailing Address After Separation), and 19b (Nearest Relative) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his new address in Honolulu, Hawaii. Since the governing regulation states that the “Home of Record” is the place recorded as the home of record of the Soldier when enlisted, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request to amend item 7b on his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010836

    Original file (20120010836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence to the contrary that the applicant did not provide the address entered in item 19a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 February 2007. There is no evidence showing the applicant resided in Texas when he entered the military and there no is no evidence showing his mailing address after separating was improperly recorded on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020274

    Original file (20090020274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at the Time of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 9 April 1998. The same HOR is listed on his 1997 DD Form 4/1 as shown in Item 7a of this DD Form 214. Neither the evidence submitted with the application nor the evidence of record supports his request or that Item 7b of his DD Form 214 is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006444

    Original file (20140006444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal with two campaign stars (correctly known as bronze service stars) and the Iraq Campaign Medal with bronze service star. The applicant states: * his number of bronze service stars were switched * Item 19b of his DD Form 214 is incorrect because his ex-wife was not his nearest relative at the time he was released from active duty 3. The Afghanistan Campaign Medal period of eligibility is on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008141

    Original file (20090008141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's contention that items 7b, 19a, and 19b of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that the addresses are located in Kansas City, MO, was carefully considered and determined to have merit. The evidence shows that the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for the period ending 7 April 2005 on which the state in items 7b, 19a, and 19b erroneously appears as “KS.” The DD Form 214 is of...