Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010836
Original file (20120010836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  13 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120010836 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show State of Texas residency, in effect, his mailing address after separation.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD 214 should be corrected to show Texas as his mailing address after separation.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a Substitute Form 1098 (Mortgage Account Statement) for the year 2011. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior service, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 April 1989.  

3.  On 28 February 2007, he retired from Fort Jackson, SC.

4.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 February 2007 shows in:

   a.  Item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at Time of Entry) " #### LITTLEFIELD DETROIT MICHIGAN." 

   b.  Item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) the entry "### RIDGE TRAIL ROAD COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINA #####-####.  

   c.  Item 19b (Nearest Relative) the entry "######## ##### ### RIDGE TRAIL ROAD COLUMBIA SOUTH CAROLINA #####-####."

5.  The applicant provided a Substitute Form 1098, which was mailed to: #### Crusader Bend, Cibolo TX  #####-####.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The instruction for preparing item 7b states enter the street, city, state and ZIP code listed as a Soldier’s HOR, which is the address recorded when the Soldier is commissioned, appointed, enlisted, or ordered to a tour of active duty.  This cannot be changed unless there is a break in service of at least one full day.  The instructions for preparing items 19a and 19b state that the information will be provided by the Soldier.  The mailing address must be a permanent address.  When the relative named in item 19b is at the same address as 19a, the entry, "(NAME) and ADDRESS SAME AS BLOCK 19a" will be entered in 19b.  The information in these items is used primarily when documents need to be forwarded to the Soldier immediately after separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to change his mailing address to an address in Texas was carefully considered and it was determined there is insufficient evidence to support his request.

2.  The governing regulation states the mailing address after separation will be provided by the applicant (i.e., at the time of separation).  There is no evidence to the contrary that the applicant did not provide the address entered in item 19a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 February 2007.  He separated from Fort Jackson, SC, and it is reasonable to presume that his immediate address at the time of his separation was in South Carolina.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of the applicant’s request.

3.  There is no evidence showing the applicant resided in Texas when he entered the military and there no is no evidence showing his mailing address after separating was improperly recorded on his DD Form 214.  In view of the forgoing there is no basis for granting the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010836



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120010836



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006841

    Original file (20140006841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the Legion of Merit was approved after his DD Form 214 was completed and the addresses in items 19a and 19b are incorrect. The available evidence does not support his request for correction of items 19a and 19b of his DD Form 214 to show an address in Ridgeway, South Carolina instead of an address in Montgomery, Louisiana. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013559

    Original file (20140013559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The DD Form 214 is a snapshot in time and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his REFRAD. The fact that his post-service address and nearest relative changed after he was REFRAD is not a basis for granting his request to amend item 19a or 19b of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027604

    Original file (20100027604.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of blocks 19a (Mailing Address after Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence clearly shows that there is a typographical error in the address listed in Block 19a of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022626

    Original file (20110022626.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "97xx Cxxxxxxxn, Mixxx, Flxxxx 33xxx" in lieu of the exiting entries. The applicant provides his DD Form 214. The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011489

    Original file (20130011489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 September 1997 be corrected to show his current address and spouse. The DD Form 214 is a snapshot in time and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his REFRAD. However, it appears his address and nearest relative changed after he was REFRAD; therefore, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020274

    Original file (20090020274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to item 7b (Home of Record (HOR) at the Time of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 9 April 1998. The same HOR is listed on his 1997 DD Form 4/1 as shown in Item 7a of this DD Form 214. Neither the evidence submitted with the application nor the evidence of record supports his request or that Item 7b of his DD Form 214 is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001110

    Original file (20130001110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain a DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), separation packet, or his originally-issued DD Form 214 pertaining to his discharge on 2 February 1996. The applicant's reissued DD Form 214 erroneously shows he entered active duty on 21 November 1981 and he was discharged on 2 February 1996 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070382C070402

    Original file (2002070382C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Item 7b of her DD Form 214 and item 3 (Home of Record at Time of Entry) of her DD Form 4/1, dated 4 April 1986, show the same entry. The evidence of record shows that the HOR in item 3 of her DD Form 4/1, dated 4 April 1986 and item 7b of her DD Form 214, dated 28 November 1991, is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003702

    Original file (20130003702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an address in Conroe, Texas instead of an address in Crestview, Florida. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of item 19a of her DD Form 214 to show an address in Conroe, Texas instead of an address in Crestview, Florida. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010556C070208

    Original file (20040010556C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect the correct information in items 19a through 28 and that his end of tour award be added to his DD Form 214. His records show that at the time he enlisted, his spouse resided at the address in Memphis, Tennessee, that is contained on his DD Form 214 dated 2 March 1991. However, there is no evidence to show that he was recommended for any awards that are not contained on his DD Form 214.