Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006841
Original file (20140006841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:    

		BOARD DATE:  20 November 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140006841 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Legion of Merit.  He further requests correction of items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) to an address in Ridgeway, South Carolina.

2.  The applicant states the Legion of Merit was approved after his DD Form 214 was completed and the addresses in items 19a and 19b are incorrect.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a DA Form 4980-11 (Legion of Merit Certificate).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 30 June 2012, the applicant was honorably retired for sufficient service in the rank/grade of sergeant major/E-9.  His DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 19a, an address in Montgomery, Louisiana
* item 19b, an individual with an address in Montgomery, Louisiana
* item 21a (Member Signature), the applicant's digital signature
* item 21b (Date), he signed the form on 29 June 2012

2.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Legion of Merit; however, he provides and his record contains Permanent               Order 264-01, issued by the Commanding General, Fort Bragg, NC on              20 September 2012, which awarded him the Legion of Merit.

3.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the          DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  It provides instructions for completing each item on the DD Form 214.  The instructions for items 19a and 19b state:

* mailing address after separation and nearest relative will be provided by the Soldier
* this address must be a permanent address
* advise a Soldier that the name and address of a relative should be someone who will know their location and address at all times  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Permanent orders awarded him the Legion of Merit; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. 

2.  The available evidence does not support his request for correction of items 19a and 19b of his DD Form 214 to show an address in Ridgeway, South Carolina instead of an address in Montgomery, Louisiana.

3.  Considering that the mailing address after separation is provided by the Soldier, it must be presumed that the DD Form 214 accurately reflects the information he provided.  The fact that he subsequently changed his address is noted; however, a change in plans subsequent to completion of the DD Form 214 is an insufficient basis for changing the address on his DD Form 214.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ___X___  ___X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Legion of Merit to his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting items 19a and 19b of his DD Form 214 to show an address in Ridgeway, South Carolina.  




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006841





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140006841



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010836

    Original file (20120010836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence to the contrary that the applicant did not provide the address entered in item 19a of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 February 2007. There is no evidence showing the applicant resided in Texas when he entered the military and there no is no evidence showing his mailing address after separating was improperly recorded on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011519

    Original file (20120011519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The applicant states: * the relative shown in item 19b of his DD Form 214 is not his nearest relative * his nearest relative resides in Florida 3. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014409

    Original file (20130014409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. an address in Augusta, Georgia instead of an address in Okalona, Mississippi and b. award of the Legion of Merit. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. The available evidence does not support the applicant's request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010556C070208

    Original file (20040010556C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect the correct information in items 19a through 28 and that his end of tour award be added to his DD Form 214. His records show that at the time he enlisted, his spouse resided at the address in Memphis, Tennessee, that is contained on his DD Form 214 dated 2 March 1991. However, there is no evidence to show that he was recommended for any awards that are not contained on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005310

    Original file (20090005310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that item 19a (Mailing Address after Separation) and item 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. The address and nearest relative listed in items 19a and 19b of the applicant's DD Form 214 would have been provided by him at the time it was prepared and he authenticated the DD Form 214 with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002110

    Original file (20080002110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002110 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that item 19a (Mailing Address after Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show an address in Milroy, IN. The applicant was not available to sign his DD Form 214, and it is possible the office that prepared his DD Form 214 was not aware that he was married or that his spouse resided in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013559

    Original file (20140013559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). The DD Form 214 is a snapshot in time and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his REFRAD. The fact that his post-service address and nearest relative changed after he was REFRAD is not a basis for granting his request to amend item 19a or 19b of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002156

    Original file (20110002156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his nearest relative is not B____ A____ B____-P____ but rather is his mother, E____ D____ P____, and gives her address for inclusion at item 19. The Soldier is to be notified that the name and address of a relative should be someone who will know their location and address at all times. The record does not contain any clarifying information as to why his spouse's address is different than his and his children's or why he now wishes to have his mother listed as his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091340C070212

    Original file (2003091340C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 November 2003 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091340 The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant requests that item 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and item 19b (Nearest Relative) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his new address in Florida.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011489

    Original file (20130011489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests items 19a (Mailing Address After Separation) and 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 September 1997 be corrected to show his current address and spouse. The DD Form 214 is a snapshot in time and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his REFRAD. However, it appears his address and nearest relative changed after he was REFRAD; therefore, there...