Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002027
Original file (20090002027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        24 MARCH 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090002027 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the removal of college transcripts that were posted to his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) on 19 November 2007.

2.  The applicant states that the transcripts posted to his OMPF on 19 November 2007 are old transcripts that he submitted before he graduated from college and are no longer needed because the new transcript has been posted.  Accordingly, he desires to have the old transcript removed from his OMPF.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 March 2000 for a period of 4 years, training as a diver and a cash enlistment bonus.  He completed his training and has remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 July 2004.

2.  On 19 November 2007, a college transcript was posted to the applicant's OMPF that indicates he had completed 48 credits. 

3.  On 9 December 2008, a college transcript was posted to the applicant's OMPF that indicates he was awarded an Associate of Science degree on 14 November 2008.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/Records) prescribes the policies, operating tasks and steps governing the OMPF.  It provides, in pertinent part, that all transcripts of credit from civilian colleges, universities, trade schools or business schools will be filed in the OMPF for enlisted personnel. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

2.  The transcript posted on 19 November 2007 is properly posted in the applicant's OMPF in accordance with the applicable regulation and the applicant has not provided sufficient justification for removing a document that appears to be properly filed in his records.

3.  The applicant's contention has been considered, however, the government has an interest in maintaining such records and the applicant has not shown sufficient basis as to why the transcript should not remain a matter of record.  Furthermore, in its current filing configuration, it reflects that the applicant has made steady progress in pursuing his civilian education.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION











BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ______ _  XXX _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002027



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090002027



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020012

    Original file (20080020012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of a civilian education transcript dated 11 October 2005 from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant states that the transcript in question is an old transcript and she has since added one from the same college showing her degree awarded. The transcript in question is properly filed in the applicant's OMPF in accordance with the applicable regulations and she has failed to show through evidence submitted with her application and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003116

    Original file (20140003116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the transcript from Suffield College and University be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). He provides MILPER Message Number 10-109, issued 15 April 2010, title: Procedures for Removal of Fraudulent Diplomas or Transcripts from a Soldier's OMPF. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed what the Army did in his case was correct and the transcript was properly filed in his record after being submitted by the applicant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015161

    Original file (20090015161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 06 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015161 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding him the second and third Army Good Conduct Medal have incorrect dates or the period of service is duplicated. The applicant’s OMPF contains: a. Bravo Detachment, 18th Personnel Services Battalion Permanent Orders Number 255-48, dated 11 September 2000, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008573

    Original file (20150008573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a Colton University transcript from his military records. Now that he knows this, he would like the transcript removed from his records. A review of the applicant's military records reveals he submitted two transcripts for filing in his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004011

    Original file (20110004011.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * USAR Discharge Orders * College Transcripts * Honorable Discharge Certificate * E-mail exchanged with various individuals CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. She was considered for promotion to CPT by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 Reserve Components Selection Promotion Board (RCSB) that convened on 6 November 2007; the board results were released on 31 December 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000072

    Original file (20090000072.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the 4 June 2003 orders for her first award of the Good Conduct Medal and the 4 December 2008 revocation orders for this award be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant provides Permanent Orders 320-006, dated 18 November 2002; Permanent Orders 155-056, dated 4 June 2003; Permanent Orders 339-01, dated 4 December 2008; and copies of Central Carolina Community College transcripts issued on 17 April 1996 and 11 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012852

    Original file (20110012852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) disqualification memorandum from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or transfer of the memorandum from the performance section to the restricted section of his OMPF. The evidence of record shows the AGCM disqualification memorandum is properly filed in the performance section of the applicant's OMPF. Records show that on 10 November 2010, the DASEB directed the Article 15, dated 14 May 2007, be transferred from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017457

    Original file (20130017457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was appointed as a Reserve warrant officer of the Army, in the rank of warrant officer one, on 30 September 1994. Despite the concerns raised by the reason the applicant provides as the basis for his request, the diploma that is filed in the performance folder of his OMPF is properly filed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012401C070205

    Original file (20060012401C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the Maine Army National Guard on 28 November 1995 and was ordered to active duty for training on 7 August 1996. The evidence of record shows that the governing Army regulation authorizes the filing of college transcripts in the OMPF. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's college transcripts are filed in the performance section of his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010709

    Original file (20150010709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appellant requests that a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be removed from the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) states that enlisted Soldiers in the rank of sergeant or above, and commissioned officers may request the transfer of a DA Form 2627 from the performance section to the restricted section of their OMPF. Thus, the evidence of record does not...