Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013198C070206
Original file (20050013198C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        18 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050013198


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Prevolia A. Harper            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Slone                    |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of an Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and a
duplicate award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant submits two DD Forms 149.  On the first application, the
applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Army Commendation
Medal for meritorious service on 3 May 2000.  He explains that when the
certificate for this award was completed, the certificate was typed as the
Army Achievement Medal instead of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

3.  The applicant further states that he noticed the problem shortly after
the awards ceremony and the problem was corrected by reprinting the
certificate with an ARCOM.  However, upon reviewing his Official Military
Personnel File (OMPF), he noticed that the incorrect certificate was posted
to his OMPF as well as the ARCOM.

4.  On the second application, the applicant states that Order Number 202-
003, [Personnel Services Battalion, Fort Lewis, Washington] dated 20 July
2000 pertaining to his award of the AGCM (2nd Award) should be removed
because he was awarded the AGCM for the same period by mistake.  The
applicant also states that related revocation orders, Order Number 75-001,
[22nd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort Lewis, Washington] dated 15 March
2004, should also be removed from his Official Military Personnel File
(OMPF).

5.  The applicant provides:

      a.  A DA Form 638.

      b.  A Certificate for the Army Commendation Medal, dated 3 May 2000.

      c.  Permanent Orders Number 166-24, 510th Personnel Services
Battalion, Vicenza, Italy, dated 15 June 1999.

      d.  Permanent Order 202-003, 22nd Personnel Services Battalion,
Fort Lewis, Washington, dated 20 July 2000.

      e.  Orders Number 75-001, 22nd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort
Lewis, Washington, dated 15 March 2004.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 September 1992.  He has
served continuously on active duty and is currently assigned to Fort
Belvoir, Virginia.

2.  The applicant’s record shows he was awarded the ARCOM on 2 June 1999
for meritorious service during the period 15 July 1996 to 14 July 1999.  He
was also awarded his 2nd ARCOM on 3 May 2000 for the exceptionally
meritorious service during the period 20 March 2000 to 28 April 2000; his
third for the period 1 October 2003 to 31 August 2004, and his fourth for
the period 1 September 2004 to 5 March 2006 (although the year appears to
be an error).

3.  The applicant’s record shows that he was awarded the AAM for the
periods
7 January 1994 to 14 June 1996 and 6 through 16 April 1996.  On 3 May 2000,
the applicant was also awarded the AAM for the period 20 March 2000 to 28
April 2000.  However, this is the same period as his award for the ARCOM.

4.  The applicant’s record shows that he was awarded the AGCM (1st Award)
for the periods 12 August 1993 to 11 August 1996, AGCM (2nd Award) for the
period 12 August 1996 to 11 August 1999, a second AGCM (2nd Award) was
granted on 20 July 2000 for the same period, AGCM (3rd Award) for the
period 12 August 1999 to 11 August 2002, and the AGCM (4th Award) for the
period 12 August 2002 to 11 August 2005.

5.  The applicant provided Orders Number 75-001, 22nd Personnel Services
Battalion, Fort Lewis, Washington, dated 15 March 2004.  These orders
revoked Orders Number 202-003, 22nd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort
Lewis, Washington, dated 20 July 2004.  The OMPF available to the Board
does not contain these orders.

6.  The applicant provided a copy of a DA Form 638.  This form shows in
item
10 (Recommended Award) that the applicant was recommended for the ARCOM.
This form shows on page 2 that the ARCOM was the approved award and does
not show that this award was downgraded.  The applicant also provided the
accompanying certificate for the ARCOM.





7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the ARCOM may
be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who,
while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941,
distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or
meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal
recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in
orders are required.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AGCM is awarded
to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and
fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This
period is normally 3 years or, for the first award only, upon termination
of service of on or after      27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more
than 1 year.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant received numerous awards of the AGCM, AAM, and the ARCOM
during the period 18 December 1996 through 5 March 2005.

2.  Evidence of record shows the applicant received duplicate awards of the
AGCM.  He was originally awarded the AGCM (2nd Award) on 15 June 1999.  He
then transferred to Fort Lewis and was awarded the AGCM (2nd Award) for the
same period.  There are no revocation orders in the OMPF available to the
Board.  Therefore, Permanent Order Number 202-003, dated 20 July 2000, is a
duplicate award and should be removed to include any future references to
these orders to include revocation Orders 75-001, dated 15 March 2004 if
applicable.

3.  Permanent Orders Number 124-3, Headquarters, 1st Personnel Group, Fort
Lewis, dated 3 May 2000 awarded the applicant the ARCOM for the period
20 March 2000 to 28 April 2000.  However, it appears an error was made on
the award certificate and the AAM was typed instead of the ARCOM.  The
applicant’s records contain both the ARCOM and the AAM for the same period.
 Therefore,
the certificate showing the AAM for the period 20 March to 28 April 2000
should be removed from the applicant’s record.









BOARD VOTE:

___JS  __  __LDS __  __KWL__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
removing the award certificate pertaining to the AAM for the period 20
March 2000 to 28 April 2000, and removing the Good Conduct Medal (2nd
Award), Permanent Order Number 202-003, dated 20 July 2000 to include any
related references to Permanent Order Number 202-003.



                                  _____    John Slone_  ____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050013198                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051018                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)          |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010514C070208

    Original file (20040010514C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Order Number 132-00026, United States Army Intelligence Center and Fort Huachuca, dated 12 May 2003 shows the applicant was awarded the AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 19 May 2000 to 20 May 2003. Permanent Orders Number 152-3, dated 1 June 1999 shows applicant was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 25 May 1996 to 23 May 1999. Permanent Orders 132-00026, dated 12 May 2003 awarded the applicant the AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 19 May 2000 to 20 May 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000030

    Original file (20150000030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His OMPF contains the following orders that awarded him the AGCM, listed chronologically by order date: * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 90-46, dated 26 August 1993 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 31-60, dated 4 April 1994 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Detachment A, 90th Personnel Service Battalion (PSB) Permanent Orders 131-12, dated 4 November 1996 (AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018655

    Original file (20070018655.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documents filed on this fiche are those that must be permanently kept to record a Soldier’s military service, manage a Soldier’s career, and protect the interests of the Soldier and the Army. Documents on this fiche are those that must be permanently kept to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier’s service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods; and corrections to other parts of the OMPF; record investigation reports; record appellate action; and protect the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023180

    Original file (20100023180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states PO 26-886, dated 26 January 2001, is the appropriate order for the AGCM (2nd Award) that covers the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000. A review of his record shows the following awards are filed in the performance section of his OMPF: a. AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1997 per PO 029-00014 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, on 29 January 1998; b. AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000 per PO...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012874

    Original file (20110012874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or any other evidence in his OMPF, such as DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award), showing he was awarded two awards of the ARCOM or three awards of the AAM. Although the applicant provided an address in Port Lavaca, TX for item 19a of his DD Form 214, it does not change the HOR at the time of entry into military service. Based on the above and the fact that there is no evidence in his OMPF or iPERMS record that shows he was awarded any additional awards of the ARCOM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011540

    Original file (20090011540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the following duplicate documents from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF): a. duplicate orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award); b. duplicate orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (4th Award); and c. duplicate memoranda, dated 10 August 2003, awarding him the Gold Recruiter Badge with three sapphire achievement stars. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued two sets of orders awarding him his second award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015161

    Original file (20090015161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 06 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015161 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding him the second and third Army Good Conduct Medal have incorrect dates or the period of service is duplicated. The applicant’s OMPF contains: a. Bravo Detachment, 18th Personnel Services Battalion Permanent Orders Number 255-48, dated 11 September 2000, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001909

    Original file (20110001909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding him the GCMDL (1st Award) were revoked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. filing in his OMPF Permanent Orders 026-01, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009232C070206

    Original file (20050009232C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s request to have a memorandum, dated 19 November 1996 pertaining to denial of award to the AGCM removed from his records was carefully considered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Department of the Army, 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry, Fort Drum, New York, memorandum dated 19 November 1996 and titled Denial of Good Conduct Medal, be removed from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000414

    Original file (20090000414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of a duplicate order for award of the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). On 12 December 2008, Task Force Hammer, 62nd Engineer Combat Battalion (Heavy), Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan, published Permanent Order 347-001, revoking Permanent Orders 119-00237, issued by Headquarters, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum on 29 April 1997, that awarded the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for his...