Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016461
Original file (20080016461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       5 MAY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016461 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 12f (Foreign Service) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 September 2008 to show she served 5 months and 3 days of foreign service from her first mobilization from 29 December 2002 through 1 June 2003.  

2.  The applicant also requests correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty) on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 to show she served in primary specialty 66P (Family Nurse Practitioner) for 13 years and 11 months and served in specialty 66H (Medical Surgical Nurse) for 8 years and 10 months.  

3.  The applicant states, in effect, that her previous DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 2003 and award documents show the area of concentration (AOC), specialty, and additional skill identifier (ASI) awarded to her.  

4.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 2003; her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008; a memorandum, subject: Commissioned Officer Specialty Skill Identifier and Additional Skill Identifier, dated 14 November 1995; and a memorandum, 
subject: Commissioned Officer Skill Identifier, dated 13 October 2001, in support of her application.  



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant in the Missouri Army National Guard on 12 November 1985.  

2.  Her DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 July 1991, shows she completed the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Officer Advanced Course, Phase III on 19 July 1991.  This report shows her specialty as 66H.  

3.  In a 14 November 1995 memorandum, the Missouri Army National Guard notified the applicant that her State Military Personnel File had been reviewed and she was awarded ASI 8E (Nurse Practitioner).  

4.  In a 13 October 2001 memorandum, the Missouri Army National Guard notified the applicant that her State Military Personnel File had been reviewed and she was awarded ASI 8E effective 13 October 2001.  

5.  Headquarters, Missouri National Guard, Office of The Adjutant General, Jefferson City, Missouri, Orders 345-069, dated 11 December 2002, show the applicant was ordered to active duty on 12 December 2002 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.  These orders show her primary specialty and ASI as 66H, 8E, respectively.  

6.  She was released from active duty on 24 June 2003.  Her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 2003 shows she served in Kuwait from 29 December 2002 through 1 June 2003.  Item 12f on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 2003 shows she served 5 months and 3 days of foreign service.  

7.  Item 11 on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 2003 shows the entry "66H 8E MED-SURGICAL NURSE--17 YRS-7 MOS//NOTHING FOLLOWS."

8.  The applicant was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel on 13 May 2005 and was granted Federal Recognition effective 13 May 2005.

9.  Headquarters, Missouri Army National Guard, Joint Force Headquarters, Orders 123-329, dated 3 May 2005, shows the applicant was reassigned from duty position Head Nurse (66H) to duty position Nurse Practitioner (66H) effective 1 January 2005.  



10.  In a 19 June 2006 memorandum, the Missouri National Guard notified the applicant that her Military Personnel File had been reviewed and she was awarded specialty 61P (Psychiatrist) effective 19 June 2006.  This memorandum indicates that her Primary Specialty Skill Identifier (PSSI) of 62H was withdrawn.  This memorandum appears to have been issued in error as there is no evidence the applicant was ever Medical Corps.

11.  In a 23 August 2006 memorandum, the Missouri National Guard notified the applicant that her Military Personnel File had been reviewed and she was awarded specialty 66P effective 23 August 2006.  

12.  The applicant was ordered to active duty on 1 September 2006 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.  

13.  The applicant was given an annual Officer Evaluation Report for the period ending 9 May 2008 which shows her specialty as 66P and was assigned for duty at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (HRC-STL).  

14.  She was released from active duty on 10 September 2008.  Item 12f of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 does not show any foreign service.  Item 18 (Remarks) of this discharge document shows she was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom but not that she served overseas during this period of mobilization.  

15.  Item 11 on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 shows the entry "66P FAMILY NURSE PRACTITI - 2 YRS - 0 MOS//NOTHING FOLLOWS."

16.  In an 8 April 2009 electronic mail message, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) informed a staff member of the Case Management Division that they were unable to verify the applicant served in a combat zone or received hostile fire pay (HFP)/imminent danger pay (IDP) during the period September 2006 to September 2008.  

17.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  In pertinent part, it directs that the titles of all MOS or AOC served for at least one year and the number of years and months served will be entered in item 11.  For time determination, 16 days or more count as a month.  For commissioned officers, also specify the AOC consisting of 2 numerical digits and 1 letter.  
18.  Army Regulation 635-5 directs that foreign service performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered in item 12f.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was ordered to active duty from 12 December 2002 through 24 June 2003 and served in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom during this period.  She was issued a DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 2003 which properly reflects 5 months and 3 days of foreign service in item 12f for her service in Kuwait from 29 December 2002 to 1 June 2003.

2.  The applicant was ordered to active duty from 1 September 2006 to 10 September 2008 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.  However, there is no evidence that she deployed overseas during her second mobilization.

3.  Although the applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 to show her foreign service from her first mobilization (29 December 2002 through 1 June 2003), the governing regulation directs that only foreign completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 should be entered in item 12f.  Therefore, there is no basis for amending her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 to show she served 5 months and 3 days of foreign service.

4.  The applicant states, in effect, that her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June 2003 and award documents show AOC, specialty, and ASI awarded to her.  

5.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was not awarded specialty 66P until 23 August 2006.  She served in specialty 66P while on active duty from 1 September 2006 to 10 September 2008.  Therefore, her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 properly reflects that she served in specialty 66P for 2 years.  

6.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant held specialty 66H during her last mobilization.  Therefore, there is no basis for amending item 11 of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 to reflect she served in specialty 66H for 8 years and 10 months.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _XXX______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016461





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016461



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019853

    Original file (20120019853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a certificate from the American Nurses Credentialing Center * a memorandum, dated 17 March 2007, from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * a memorandum, dated 19 April 2005, from Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Command, Fort McPherson, GA with Army Reserve Clinical Credentialing Affairs (ARCCA) Checklist * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) * transcripts from the State University of New York * four reference letters * his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001606

    Original file (20150001606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show: * her additional skill identifier (ASI) 8A (Critical Care Nursing (CCN)) was reinstated * she is entitled to CCN specialty pay as a result of the correction 2. Part IVc(1)(Character) the comments: [Applicant] has demonstrated a lack of integrity on several occasions, failing to take responsibility for her actions when making serious errors. In March 2015, the applicant herself, in a response to a referred OER, admitted she had made...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007161

    Original file (20100007161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 6 March 2009, the applicant completed and signed a DA Form 61 (Application for Appointment) requesting an appointment in the USAR in the Army Nurse Corps in AOC 66P. The applicant accepted a second appointment in the USAR as a commissioned officer in the rank of 1LT on 15 May 2009 in the Army Nurse Corps. As he had recent prior service as a commissioned officer in the Army Nurse Corps and had received special incentive pay through the Health Professional Student Loan Repayment Program,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017726

    Original file (20080017726.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation provides, in pertinent part, for the entry of the titles of all AOCs the individual served in for at least 1 year in item 11 of the DD Form 214 and include for each AOC the number of years and months served. There is no evidence in the record that shows when she passed the NCLEX-RN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 11 of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show she served in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018153

    Original file (20140018153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant did not indicate or provide documentation to support the training and board certification requirements as a Nurse Care Manager. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: As verified by OTSG, the applicant was eligible for the RNISP in the amount of $416.66 per month while mobilized in AOC 66H and assigned as a Nurse Care Manager, WTB, Fort Stewart, for the period 3 January to 30 September 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016875

    Original file (20120016875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was promoted to first lieutenant (1LT)/pay grade O-2 with an active duty date of rank (ADOR) that takes into account the constructive credit she was granted. In support of her request the applicant provides email messages ranging in dates from 2 March through 11 May 2012 that show the applicant sought assistance in correcting her appointment documents, active duty orders, and promotion orders to show her SSI as 66H8A, 2LT DOR as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000148

    Original file (20140000148.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of special pay as a Reserve Component Nurse Practitioner during her period of mobilization from 27 April 2009 through 4 February 2012. The officer is requesting payment of special pays as a Reserve Component Nurse Practitioner (AOC 66P) during her period of mobilization from 20090427-20120204. b. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant submitted a request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007192

    Original file (20100007192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to document her Persian Gulf service. The evidence of record contains no documents confirming the applicant served in the Persian Gulf or in any other oversea area during her active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006413

    Original file (20130006413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states a. According to the ARNG AMEDD Officer Incentive Programs for FY08, she was eligible for both the HPLR and the Special Pay Incentive and would have received both if her paperwork had been completed correctly at the time of her accession into the ARNG. According to NGB Incentives Branch, she has a USAREC Form 1252 and USAREC board results which show the intent to contract for the Special Pay and the HPLR benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002395

    Original file (20130002395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Advanced Wound Management Certification Course. The Advanced Wound Management Certification Course is not included among the courses found in this Army pamphlet.