Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017726
Original file (20080017726.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  21 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017726 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 
1 July 2002 be corrected to show her time spent in the area of concentration (AOC) “66H 8A (MED-SURGICAL/CRITICAL CARE NURSE- - 5YRS-5MOS-21DAYS.” 

2.  The applicant states the current time, 0 years, 0 months, in the AOC 66H 8A is incorrect and does not accurately reflect her time spent in her specialty.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records show that on 2 June 1996 she received an appointment as a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve.  Her appointment provided that she would be branch assigned as an Army Nurse Corps officer upon passing the NCLEX-RN (National Council Licensure Exam for Registered Nurses) and that failure to comply with the governing regulation would result in a branch reassignment.

3.  The applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve on 2 June 1996.

4.  On 3 December 1996, the applicant was ordered to active duty in the Army Nurse Corps to attend the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Officer Basic Course, to report 12 January 1997, with a follow on assignment to Landstuhl Army Medical Center in Germany.  Her active duty commitment was for 4 years and her projected and control specialty was AOC 66H.

5.  The applicant attended the AMEDD Officer Basic Course from 13 January 1997 to 25 March 1997.  

6.  An Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for the period from 26 March 1997 to 
2 August 1997 shows the applicant's designated specialty as 66H.

7.  The applicant's Officer Record Brief (ORB) shows that her duty AOC for all of her assignments while on active duty was 66H.

8.  On 1 July 2002, the applicant was released from active duty.  She had completed 5 years, 5 months, and 21 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.

9.  Item 11 of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists her AOC as 66H 8A.  However, the time spent in that AOC is shown as 0 years and 0 months.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation provides, in pertinent part, for the entry of the titles of all AOCs the individual served in for at least 1 year in item 11 of the DD Form 214 and include for each AOC the number of years and months served.  For time determination, 16 days or more count as a month.  Time spent in basic training and advance individual training is not included.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the time spent in her AOC of 66H listed in Item 11 of her DD Form 214 should read 5 years, 5 months, and 21 days.

2.  The applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Army Nurse Corps contingent on her passing the NCLEX-RN.  There is no evidence in the record that shows when she passed the NCLEX-RN.  However, based on her evaluation reports and duty AOC at all of her assignments, it is reasonable to conclude she did in fact pass the NCLEX-RN.  Therefore, applicant was assigned the AOC 66H during her entire period of active service.

3.  According to Army Regulation 635-5, when computing time spent in an AOC the period in basic training is not included.  Therefore, the period during which the applicant was attending the AMEDD Officer Basic Course would not be included in the time spent in her AOC.

4.  In view of the above, the period during which the applicant was attending the AMEDD Officer Basic Course, 2 months and 13 days, would be subtracted from her amount of active service, 5 years, 5 months, and 21 days, during this period to determine the time she served in AOC 66H.  Therefore, the amount of time the applicant served in her AOC should show 5 years and 3 months.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ____X__  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 11 of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show she served in the AOC of 66H 8A for 5 years and 3 months.



2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to time served in AOC 66H 8A in excess of 5 years and 3 months.  




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017726



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017726



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001606

    Original file (20150001606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show: * her additional skill identifier (ASI) 8A (Critical Care Nursing (CCN)) was reinstated * she is entitled to CCN specialty pay as a result of the correction 2. Part IVc(1)(Character) the comments: [Applicant] has demonstrated a lack of integrity on several occasions, failing to take responsibility for her actions when making serious errors. In March 2015, the applicant herself, in a response to a referred OER, admitted she had made...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018153

    Original file (20140018153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant did not indicate or provide documentation to support the training and board certification requirements as a Nurse Care Manager. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: As verified by OTSG, the applicant was eligible for the RNISP in the amount of $416.66 per month while mobilized in AOC 66H and assigned as a Nurse Care Manager, WTB, Fort Stewart, for the period 3 January to 30 September 2013. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019853

    Original file (20120019853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * a certificate from the American Nurses Credentialing Center * a memorandum, dated 17 March 2007, from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * a memorandum, dated 19 April 2005, from Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Command, Fort McPherson, GA with Army Reserve Clinical Credentialing Affairs (ARCCA) Checklist * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) * transcripts from the State University of New York * four reference letters * his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021744

    Original file (20100021744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The applicant stated she had 2 years of ICU RN experience; however, she could not receive work experience credit after being boarded on 10 February 2009, the date of the board, regardless of how long it took her to enter active duty per Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department Branches). (2) Paragraph 6.1.2.2.5. states that credit of one-half year for each year of experience, up to a maximum of three years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013900

    Original file (20140013900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she contracted for a Registered Nurse (RN) Incentive Special Pay (ISP) bonus at $5,000/year effective 15 September 2013. The applicant provides: * Request for Specialty RN ISP, dated 25 June 2013 * Officer Record Brief, dated 21 June 2013 * CCRN certificate and certification card * All Army Activities (ALARACT) Message 365/2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of her records to show she contracted for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016040

    Original file (20140016040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * a 12-page list titled "2012 CPT AMEDD (Army Medical Department) Promotion Selection Board Results by Competitive Category" * her CPT promotion order * two copies of her 1LT promotion order CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. If she had not been in the USAR, she would have attended the active duty BOLC prior to starting USAGPAN when she entered active duty on 25 May 2012, and therefore would have been board eligible for the FY13 CPT AMEDD ADL PSB. Enclosure 3, 4(c)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006413

    Original file (20130006413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states a. According to the ARNG AMEDD Officer Incentive Programs for FY08, she was eligible for both the HPLR and the Special Pay Incentive and would have received both if her paperwork had been completed correctly at the time of her accession into the ARNG. According to NGB Incentives Branch, she has a USAREC Form 1252 and USAREC board results which show the intent to contract for the Special Pay and the HPLR benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016461

    Original file (20080016461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 12f (Foreign Service) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 10 September 2008 to show she served 5 months and 3 days of foreign service from her first mobilization from 29 December 2002 through 1 June 2003. Item 12f of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 September 2008 does not show any foreign service. The applicant states, in effect, that her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020888

    Original file (20140020888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her recruiter did not complete a constructive credit worksheet (DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Entry Grade Credit (Health Professional Officers))), to account for her service on the Telemetry Ward since she was only 1 week away from having a full year of volunteer time. (2) Paragraph 6.1.2.2.5. states credit of one-half year for each year of experience, up to a maximum of three years of constructive credit, may be granted for experience in a health profession, if such experience is directly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002784

    Original file (20140002784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This notification announced anticipated changes to the AMEDD Special Pays and stated, in pertinent part, the following: * official notification announcing any program changes would be released via an All Army Activities (ALARACT) message once all the details were finalized * effective 1 October 2013, RNISP would no longer be authorized for AOC 66H * nurses in AOC 66H would remain in their current RNISP contracts until they expired; however, no new RNISP contracts would be offered after 1...