Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016225
Original file (20080016225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016225 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was separated in pay grade E-5 vice pay grade E-4 (specialist 4 (SP4)).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to pay grade E-5 prior to his discharge.  He also states, in effect, that this pay grade shown on his DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) does not match his DD Form 214.

3.  In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and his DD Form 256A.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States, in pay grade E-1, on 23 April 1968.  He was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 15 April 1969.

3.  The applicant was released from active duty, in pay grade E-4, on 23 January 1970, as an Overseas Returnee.  He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).

4.  Item 5a. (Grade, Rate or Rank), of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the rank, SP4.  Item 5b. (Pay Grade) shows pay grade E-4.  Item 6 (Date of Rank) shows 15 April 1969.  The applicant's record shows no evidence he was promoted to pay grade E-5 while he was serving on active duty.

5.  The applicant was discharged from the USAR, in the rank and pay grade of SP5, on 1 April 1974, at the expiration of his term of service.  He was issued a DD Form 256A at the time of his discharge.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  The Soldier's rank and date of rank in which they were serving on their release from active duty would be entered in Item 5a and 5b, respectively.  The date the Soldier was promoted to the rank listed would be entered in Item 6.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to a correction to his pay grade from E-4 to E-5 on his DD Form 214, dated 23 January 1970.  He has not shown error, injustice, or inequity for the relief he now seeks. 

2.  The applicant contends that the pay grade E-5 is not shown on his 1970 DD Form 214 as it is shown on his DD Form 256A.  However, the evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 15 April 1969 while serving on active duty.  He was released from active duty on 23 January 1970 and transferred to the USAR.  He was issued a DD Form 214 properly showing his pay grade as E-4, with a date of rank 15 April 1969.

3.  It appears that he was promoted to pay grade SP5 while serving in the USAR. He was discharged from the USAR, in pay grade SP5, on 1 April 1974.  He was issued a DD Form 256A properly showing his pay grade as SP5.

4.  The applicant has provided no evidence to show he was promoted to and satisfactorily held the pay grade of E-5 while he served on active duty.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant held the rank and pay grade SP4/E-4 on the date of his release from active duty.  Therefore, there is no error in the entry of his rank or pay grade on his DD Form 214.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016225



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016225


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016748

    Original file (20070016748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to SP5 before he was separated from the Army and requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5. Therefore it would be appropriate, to correct his DD Form 214 to show that he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of SP5/E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing the entry "SP5" in item 5a (Grade/Rate or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020607

    Original file (20130020607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) to show the rank of specialist five (SP5) * Item 5b (Pay Grade) to show pay grade E-5 2. The regulation states items 5a and 5b would list the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and item 6 would list the effective date for the grade shown in items 5a and 5b. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000636

    Original file (20080000636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000636 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. His service personnel records contain a DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated 20 October 1970, which shows his rank and pay grade as SP5, E-5. Although there are no orders in the available records which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009114

    Original file (20090009114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record show the applicant's rank at the time of his discharge was SP4. In the absence of promotion orders to SP5, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a and 5b on his DD Form 214. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001810

    Original file (20090001810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, his DD Form 214 does not show his correct rank and pay grade and he wants it corrected for his permanent records. The applicant's military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States, in pay grade E-1, on 4 March 1969, for 2 years. Based on the evidence, the applicant is entitled to a correction of his DD Form 214, in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, currently in effect, to show he was released from active duty in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011420

    Original file (20100011420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends his rank and grade should be corrected to show SP5/E-5 on his DD Form 214. The available evidence confirms the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SP5/E-5 effective 17 October 1969 in official orders that were published subsequent to his 26 October 1969 REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011880

    Original file (20090011880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show specialist five (SP5)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. In the absence of promotion orders to SP5, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a and 5b on his DD Form 214. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004703

    Original file (20110004703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 October 1968, while in Vietnam, Special Orders Number 277, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, appointing him to the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 (Permanent (P)). On 29 October 1969, Special Orders Number 302, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, ordered his release from active duty effective 29 October 1969. Army Regulation 600-200 also states the temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel in grade in which computed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009937

    Original file (20100009937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009937 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s record also contains the following documents prepared during his separation processing, all dated 29 May 1970, that list his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5: * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023091

    Original file (20110023091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2495 (Disposition Form), dated 10 August 1971, subject: 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Standing List, with Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel to Pay Grade E-5 * Special Orders Number 277, U.S. Army Flight Training Center and Fort Stewart, Fort Stewart, GA, dated 13 October 1971 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He appeared before the 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Board on 5 August 1971 and was...