Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011420
Original file (20100011420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011420


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer of Discharge) to show his correct rank.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly lists his rank as specialist four (SP4/E-4) instead of specialist five (SP5/E-5).

3.  The applicant provides the following in support of his application:

* Winnebago County Department of Veterans Services Letter
* Promotion Order
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military personnel records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 March 1968.  He was trained in and awarded in military occupational specialty 31B (Field Radio Mechanic).

3.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was last promoted to SP4 on              15 January 1969.

4.  On 26 October 1969, Headquarters, United States Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, Washington, published Orders Number 299.  These orders directed the applicant's release from active duty in the rank of SP5 on 26 October 1969.

5.  The applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) includes a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), his separation examination, and a DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) dated 26 October 1969.  Both of these documents list the applicant’s rank as SP5.

6.  On 26 October 1969, the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of chapter 5, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations).  The DD Form 214 issued to him at that time lists his rank as SP4 in item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank); his pay grade as E-4 in item 5b (Pay Grade); and his date of rank as “15 Jan 69” in item 6 (Date of Rank).

7.  On 28 October 1969, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, published Special Orders Number 301.  This order announced the applicant’s promotion from SP4 to the temporary rank of SP5 effective 17 October 1969.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Paragraph 2-4h(4) states to enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation, indicating whether permanent (P) or temporary (T) in item 5a; enter the pay grade in item 5b; and enter the date of rank for the grade shown in item 5a in item 6.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his rank and grade should be corrected to show SP5/E-5 on his DD Form 214.


2.  By regulation, the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered in item 5a and item 5b of the DD Form 214 and the effective date of rank for the rank shown in item 5a will be entered in item 6.  The available evidence confirms the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SP5/E-5 effective 17 October 1969 in official orders that were published subsequent to his 26 October 1969 REFRAD.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected at this time to show the following entries:

* item 5a – SP5 (T)
* item 5b – E-5
* item 6 – 17 October 1969

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DD Form 214 by deleting the current entries in item 5a, 5b, and item 6; adding the entry "SP5" to item 5a, "E-5" to item 5b, and 
"1969 10 17" to item 6; and by issuing a correction to the DD Form 214 to reflect these changes.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011420





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011420



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023091

    Original file (20110023091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2495 (Disposition Form), dated 10 August 1971, subject: 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Standing List, with Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel to Pay Grade E-5 * Special Orders Number 277, U.S. Army Flight Training Center and Fort Stewart, Fort Stewart, GA, dated 13 October 1971 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He appeared before the 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Board on 5 August 1971 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004703

    Original file (20110004703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 October 1968, while in Vietnam, Special Orders Number 277, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, appointing him to the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 (Permanent (P)). On 29 October 1969, Special Orders Number 302, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, ordered his release from active duty effective 29 October 1969. Army Regulation 600-200 also states the temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel in grade in which computed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001810

    Original file (20090001810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, his DD Form 214 does not show his correct rank and pay grade and he wants it corrected for his permanent records. The applicant's military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States, in pay grade E-1, on 4 March 1969, for 2 years. Based on the evidence, the applicant is entitled to a correction of his DD Form 214, in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, currently in effect, to show he was released from active duty in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001545

    Original file (20080001545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows that, prior to his discharge from active duty, the applicant was appointed/promoted to the temporary rank/grade of SP5/E-5, effective 16 July 1969. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, which fell under the USARPAC Theater of Operations, for a period of 7 months and 18 days, which is correctly shown on his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009758

    Original file (20130009758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in his service record that show he was promoted to SP5/E-5 and/or the authority and effective date of promotion. Aside from his separation order that shows his rank as SP5, there is nothing in his service record showing he reappeared before the promotion board, that he was recommended for promotion, or a promotion instrument (order) affecting his promotion. In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010796

    Original file (20120010796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 February 1969 in the rank/grade of private/E-1. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 24 February 1971, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000285

    Original file (20150000285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These orders indicate this promotion was temporary; however, his DA Form 20 shows this promotion was made permanent on 23 September 1969, under the authority of Army Regulation 600-200, paragraph 7-22a. An individual could not be promoted to SGT or staff sergeant if the promotion would cause a surplus of by-grade authorized NCO personnel in the unit to which the individual was assigned. There are no orders promoting him to the rank of SGT in his records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016748

    Original file (20070016748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to SP5 before he was separated from the Army and requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5. Therefore it would be appropriate, to correct his DD Form 214 to show that he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of SP5/E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing the entry "SP5" in item 5a (Grade/Rate or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015217

    Original file (20140015217.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his rank/grade as that of SP5/E-5. He responded and provided a copy of SO Number 292 (his separation orders), issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Dix, on 19 October 1967 listing his rank as "SP5." Although his record is void of any orders promoting him to SP5/E-5 while on active duty, his DA Form 20 and a USAAC Form 368 shows that he was promoted to the rank/grade of SP5/E-5 effective 25 September 1967...