RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 April 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000636
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Director
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Chairperson
Member
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was discharged in pay grade E-5. He also requests correction of his records to show his temporary duty (TDY) in Vietnam in 1970.
2. The applicant states he was promoted to E-5 while in Korea during his assignment with the Korean Military Assistance Group. He also states he was TDY in Vietnam in 1970.
3. The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 March 1968 for a period of three years in pay grade, E-1. At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 71B (clerk typist).
3. He was promoted to the temporary rank of specialist four (SP4), E-4 on 18 February 1969.
4. Headquarters, U.S. Army Advisory Group, Korea, Special Orders Number 217, dated 10 September 1969, reassigned the applicant to duty with Headquarters, Korean Military Assistance Group, Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics (DCSLOG) in Seoul, Korea on 10 September 1969.
5. The applicants Report of Medical Examination, dated 29 September 1970 shows his rank and pay grade as SP5, E-5.
6. Item 31 (Foreign Service) on his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the applicant served TDY in Vietnam. He departed Korea on 30 October 1970.
7. Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, Washington, Special Orders Number 303, dated 30 October 1970, released the applicant from active duty on 30 October 1970. On the standard name line, his rank is shown as specialist five (SP5).
8. His DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental Status on Release from Active Service) shows his rank as SP5.
9. His service personnel records contain a DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated 20 October 1970, which shows his rank and pay grade as SP5, E-5.
10. The applicants personnel records contain a DA Form 2376 (Notification to State Adjutants General Release from Active Duty of Obligated Reservist), dated 30 October 1970, which shows his rank as SP5.
11. Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry SP4 and item 5b (Pay Grade) shows his pay grade as E-4. His date of rank is shown as 18 February 1969.
12. There is no evidence available which indicates the applicant had TDY in Vietnam. Item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry VN SERVICE NONE.
13. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. In pertinent part it stated that the grade in which enlisted personnel served at the time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary, would be entered in item 5a and pay grade in item 5b on the DD Form 214.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although there are no orders in the available records which shows the applicants promotion to SP5, E-5, there are numerous documents in his personnel records which indicate his rank and pay grade as SP5, E-5.
2. There is no evidence of record which shows he was reduced to SP4, E-4 prior to his release from active duty. However, his DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty in the rank of SP4, E-4 with a date of rank of 18 February 1969.
3. The preponderance of evidence indicates that an administrative error has occurred in this case. Any reasonable doubt should be resolved in the applicants favor and it would be appropriate to amend items 5a and 5b on the applicant's DD Form 214 to show "SP5" and "E-5," respectively. As a matter of convenience and in the absence of any other evidence, the date (29 September 1970) of the earliest document that references his rank as SP5 will be used as his date of rank.
4. There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant served TDY in Vietnam in 1970. His service records show he was assigned to the Korean Military Assistance Group in Seoul, Korea from September 1969 to October 1970. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show TDY in Vietnam.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
x______ x______ x______ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. by amending item 5a on his DD Form 214 to show the entry "SP5";
b. by amending item 5b on his DD Form 214 to show the entry "E-5"; and
c. by amending item 6 on his DD Form 214 to show the entry 29 September 1970.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing TDY in Vietnam on his DD Form 214.
x________
CHAIRPERSON
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080000636
5
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001810
The applicant states, in effect, his DD Form 214 does not show his correct rank and pay grade and he wants it corrected for his permanent records. The applicant's military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States, in pay grade E-1, on 4 March 1969, for 2 years. Based on the evidence, the applicant is entitled to a correction of his DD Form 214, in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, currently in effect, to show he was released from active duty in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023091
The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2495 (Disposition Form), dated 10 August 1971, subject: 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Standing List, with Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel to Pay Grade E-5 * Special Orders Number 277, U.S. Army Flight Training Center and Fort Stewart, Fort Stewart, GA, dated 13 October 1971 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He appeared before the 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Board on 5 August 1971 and was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028198
General orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to: * award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011880
The applicant requests that items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show specialist five (SP5)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. In the absence of promotion orders to SP5, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a and 5b on his DD Form 214. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016748
The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to SP5 before he was separated from the Army and requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5. Therefore it would be appropriate, to correct his DD Form 214 to show that he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of SP5/E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing the entry "SP5" in item 5a (Grade/Rate or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002778
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in Korea and that he was separated in grade E-5. However, his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Korea or that he was separated in the grade of E-5. Records show the applicant served in Korea for 1 year and 1 month, from 7 April 1967 through 6 May 1968, and that this service is recorded in item 22, block c of his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003672
The applicant requests correction of items 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), 5b (Pay Grade), and 6 (Date of Rank (DOR)) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant states: * His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a specialist four/E-4 when in fact he was a specialist five (SP5)/E-5 * He was promoted to SP5 while serving in Korea in early 1971 3. The separation orders and personal effects shipment notice provided by the applicant that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007610
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 and that he be paid back pay and allowances due him. The applicant has provided duly authenticated orders issued on the day he departed for assignment to Vietnam showing he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SP5 E-5 on 10 January 1970. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021156
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to: * Vietnam from 12 July 1970 to 11 July 1971 * Homestead Air Force Base, FL, from 19 August 1971 to 3 September 1972 5. The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to SP4/E-4 on 27 July 1970.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009937
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009937 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicants record also contains the following documents prepared during his separation processing, all dated 29 May 1970, that list his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5: * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental...