Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011880
Original file (20090011880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011880 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show specialist five (SP5)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states that his promotion orders for SP5 came through before he left Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides discharge orders in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 June 1968.  He served in Vietnam from 30 May 1969 to 24 April 1970.  On 24 April 1970, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  Item 5a of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "SP4."  Item 5b of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "E-4."  Item 6 (Date of Rank) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry "18 SEP 69."  

4.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant was promoted to the temporary rank of SP4 effective 18 September 1969.

5.  There are no orders which show the applicant was promoted to SP5 in the available records.  However, the applicant's service personnel records contain several documents (DD Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated 12 April 1970; a DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental Status on Release from Active Duty), dated 24 April 1970; a DD Form 2376 (Notification to State Adjutants General Release from Active Duty of Obligated Reservist), dated 24 April 1970; a Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 24 April 1970; and a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 24 April 1970) which show his rank as SP5.

6.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided discharge orders, dated 24 April 1970, which show his rank as specialist five.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Although the applicant's discharge orders and several documents show his rank as SP5/E-5, there are no orders which show he was promoted to E-5 prior to his separation.  In the absence of promotion orders to SP5, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a and 5b on his DD Form 214. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011880



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011880



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003672

    Original file (20130003672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of items 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), 5b (Pay Grade), and 6 (Date of Rank (DOR)) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant states: * His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a specialist four/E-4 when in fact he was a specialist five (SP5)/E-5 * He was promoted to SP5 while serving in Korea in early 1971 3. The separation orders and personal effects shipment notice provided by the applicant that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016748

    Original file (20070016748.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to SP5 before he was separated from the Army and requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5. Therefore it would be appropriate, to correct his DD Form 214 to show that he was discharged in the rank and pay grade of SP5/E-5. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing the entry "SP5" in item 5a (Grade/Rate or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010796

    Original file (20120010796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 February 1969 in the rank/grade of private/E-1. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 24 February 1971, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009114

    Original file (20090009114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record show the applicant's rank at the time of his discharge was SP4. In the absence of promotion orders to SP5, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a and 5b on his DD Form 214. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007610

    Original file (20130007610.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 and that he be paid back pay and allowances due him. The applicant has provided duly authenticated orders issued on the day he departed for assignment to Vietnam showing he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of SP5 E-5 on 10 January 1970. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009937

    Original file (20100009937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009937 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s record also contains the following documents prepared during his separation processing, all dated 29 May 1970, that list his rank and pay grade as SP5/E-5: * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020607

    Original file (20130020607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) to show the rank of specialist five (SP5) * Item 5b (Pay Grade) to show pay grade E-5 2. The regulation states items 5a and 5b would list the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and item 6 would list the effective date for the grade shown in items 5a and 5b. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009240

    Original file (20130009240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains the following documents, dated 4 November 1971, which show his rank as SP5: * DA Form 664 (Serviceman's Statement Concerning Application for Compensation from the Veterans Administration) * DD Form 1407 (Dependent Medical Care and DD Form 1173 Statement) * DA Form 3032-R (Statement of Medical Condition) 8. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000636

    Original file (20080000636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000636 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. His service personnel records contain a DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated 20 October 1970, which shows his rank and pay grade as SP5, E-5. Although there are no orders in the available records which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028198

    Original file (20100028198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General orders awarded him the Army Commendation Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to: * award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...