Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015034
Original file (20080015034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	        26 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015034 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the correct date of entry into active duty.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the date of entry is after the date of separation. 

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 19 March 1974, in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 13 April 1968 and trained as a helicopter repairman.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 31 March 1974.

3.  Headquarters, Fifth United States Army, Fort Sheridan, Illinois, Orders Number 10-6690, dated 22 October 1968, show the applicant was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) with a reporting date no later than 
29 November 1968.

4.  A DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report), dated 2 December 1968, shows the applicant's date of entry on ACDUTRA as 28 November 1968.

5.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he reported to ACDUTRA on 28 November 1968.

6.  Block 11d (Effective Date) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "23 May 69."

7.  Block 17c (Date of Entry) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry   "29 Nov 69."

8.  The applicant provided discharge orders which show he was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 31 March 1974.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the policy for separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the correct date of entry into active duty has been carefully reviewed and found to have merit.

2.  It is evident there is an error in the applicant's DD Form 214.  The applicant's DA Form 20 and DD Form 220 clearly show he entered ACDUTRA on 
28 November 1968.  Therefore, it would appropriate to amend the applicant's 
DD Form 214 by correcting the entry in block 17c to show the entry "28 Nov 68."

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  __X____  ___X ____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending block 17c of his DD Form 214 to show the entry "28 Nov 68." 




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015034



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015034



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021376

    Original file (20120021376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 17 July 1974 * letter from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 5 November 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. _____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029283

    Original file (20100029283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the service entry date shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015025

    Original file (20130015025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17 (Current Active Service Other Than By Induction) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "Ordered To Active Duty" vice "Ordered To ACDUTRA [Active Duty For Training]." The regulation stated in: * Item 17 - check appropriate space to indicate means of entry on the current active service; for ACDUTRA personnel, check "other" and enter "Ordered To ACDUTRA" * Item 17b - for ACDUTRA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006880

    Original file (20140006880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (h) Item 30: Enter "This abbreviated form issued to Army National Guard members per appendix A, this AR [Army Regulation]" on all abbreviated DD Forms 214 issued. Noncontinuous periods of active duty are summarized on separate DD Forms 214; therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to amend his existing DD Form 214 to include the second period of activation from 7 April 1968 to 11 April 1968. (d) Item 17a: "Other" block will be checked and enter "call Executive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004907

    Original file (20120004907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. his date of birth (DOB) as 21 June 1940; b. his date of entry on active duty as 29 April 1968; c. his foreign service as 6 months and 21 days in Vietnam; and d. his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Since his DD Form 220 shows he entered active duty on 29 April 1968, and his DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty on 12 December 1969 after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644

    Original file (20080013644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicant’s period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state “self explanatory.” b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007230

    Original file (20130007230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 January 1970 to show in: a. item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of private (PV2)/E-2; b. item 16 (Terminal Date of Reserve), his terminal date as 22 September 1975 instead of 21 May 1975; c. item 17c (Date of Entry), he entered active duty on 22 September 1969 instead 10 September 1969; and d. item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001796

    Original file (20130001796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 months of active service. He entered active duty for training on 27 July 1968 and this date is correctly listed in item 17c of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009504C070208

    Original file (20040009504C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be issued a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for his period of active duty during the period from 22 June 1968 through 30 July 1968. The applicant provides a copy of: a. his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 16 April 1964; b. his DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) that shows his effective date of entry on active duty as 22 June 1968;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509464C070209

    Original file (9509464C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    His activation orders, issued by the XX United States Army Corps, specifically state that he was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training (ACDUTRA). Again the orders specifically state the applicant was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training. It is clear, based on the various documents which ordered the applicant to active duty, that his final period of active service, 28 September 1968 through 27 April 1969, was not for the purpose of training but rather...