2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that his period of active duty, served between 28 September 1968 and 27 April 1969, was not for the purpose of training. He notes someone incorrectly recorded that period of active duty as Active Duty for Training (ACDUTRA) which has affected his ability to obtain veteran benefits.
3. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for a period of 6 years on 28 April 1963. He was assigned to the 83rd Administration Company of the 83rd Infantry Division.
4. On 8 June 1963 he was ordered to active duty for the purpose of undergoing basic and advanced individual training. His activation orders, issued by the XX United States Army Corps, specifically state that he was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training (ACDUTRA). He was released from active duty and returned to his Reserve unit on 7 December 1963, with 6 months of active service. His separation document contains an entry in item 19 indicating ordered to ACDUTRA and his reason for separations is listed as relieved from active duty training and returned to [reserve unit] to complete remaining reserve obligation....
5. Although orders are not available, it appears the applicant was ordered to active duty for two weeks of annual training with his reserve unit in the summer of 1964 and 1965. In December 1965 the applicants reserve unit was deactivated and the applicant was assigned to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training). Orders are available confirming his activation in August 1966 and August 1967 for the purpose of annual training under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, section 270(a)(2). Again the orders specifically state the applicant was being ordered to active duty for the purpose of training.
6. In March 1967 the applicant was notified by the Commanding Officer, United States Army Administration Center in St. Louis that because his original reserve unit had been deactivated he was eligible for retention in the [Ready Reserve] Pool subject to involuntary order to active duty under the provisions of Public Law 89-687.
7. On 15 May 1968 the applicant was notified that he was being involuntarily ordered to active duty for a period of 24 months less amounts of Active Duty previously performed, unless sooner relieved by proper authority under Public Law 89-687 and Title 10, United States Code, Section 673(a). His reporting date was established as 26 June 1968 and the orders clearly state the activation was involuntary and by direction of the President. There is no mention, as in previous orders, that he was being activated for the purpose of training. The applicant requested, and was granted a deferment and appears to have entered active duty on
28 September 1969.
8. He was assigned as a supply clerk with the 713th Maintenance Company at Fort Lewis, Washington, assumed duties as an alternate custodian of keys on 23 December 1968 and was promoted to pay grade E-5 in January 1969.
9. On 27 April 1969, the date which coincided with the expiration of his 6 year Reserve enlistment contract, the applicant was released from active duty. Item 17a (source of entry on active duty) on his DD Form 214 reflects ordered to ACDUTRA for 8 months, and item 17c (date of entry on active duty) reflects 28 April 1963. Item 22 (statement of service) also contains several errors including item 22b (total active service) which indicates
6 years of active service, although item 22a(1) (net service this period) correctly reflects 8 months.
10. Title 10, United States Code, section 270a, the provision under which the applicant was ordered to active duty prior to 1967, pertains to training requirements of members of the Ready Reserve. It states that such members will participate in at least 48 scheduled drills or training periods during each year and serve on active duty for training of not less than 14 days (exclusive of traveltime) during each year....
11. Title 10, United States Code, section 673a, the provision under which the applicant was ordered to active duty in 1968 applied to activation of Ready Reserve members not assigned to, or participating satisfactorily in, units. It states that the President may order to active duty any member of the Ready Reserve of an armed force who is not assigned to, or participating satisfactorily in, a unit of the Ready Reserve, has not fulfilled his statutory reserve obligation; and has not served on active duty for a total of 24 months. The section also provides that if the enlistement or period of military service of members of the Ready Reserve, ordered to active duty under this authority would expire before he has served the required period of active duty prescribed herein, his enlistment or period of military service could be extended until he served the required period.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. It is clear, based on the various documents which ordered the applicant to active duty, that his final period of active service, 28 September 1968 through 27 April 1969, was not for the purpose of training but rather under the provisions of Title 10 which allowed the President to call members of the Reserve to active duty for unsatisfactory performance or for those individual who were not a member of a Reserve unit.
2. As such the entry in item 17a ordered to ACDUTRA for 8 months inaccurately reflects the reason the applicant was ordered to active duty and should be deleted.
3. Additionally, the evidence confirms that item 17c (date of entry on active duty) on his DD Form 214 issued in April 1969, incorrectly reflects his date of entry on active duty as 28 April 1963 when in fact it should have been
28 September 1968.
4. Based on his original 6 months of active duty (630608-631207) which he completed while undergoing basic and advanced individual training and his final period of active duty (680928-690427), item 22b on his DD Form 214 should be corrected to read 14 months of total active service.
5. In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicants records as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by deleting the entry ordered to ACDUTRA for 8 months from item 17a on the DD Form 214 issued to the individual concerned on 27 April 1969;
b. by showing in item 17c (date of entry) that he entered active duty on 28 September 1968; and
c. by showing in item 22b (total active service) that he completed a total of 14 months of active duty.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082782C070215
Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve for a period of 6 years on 7 May 1964. Although the applicant was in fact a member of the United States Army Reserve at the time he was ordered to active duty in 1968, he was not ordered to active duty for training purposes as his 1969 separation document indicates. While the evidence does not indicate that the applicant was integrated into the Regular Army when he was order to active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015025
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17 (Current Active Service Other Than By Induction) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "Ordered To Active Duty" vice "Ordered To ACDUTRA [Active Duty For Training]." The regulation stated in: * Item 17 - check appropriate space to indicate means of entry on the current active service; for ACDUTRA personnel, check "other" and enter "Ordered To ACDUTRA" * Item 17b - for ACDUTRA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006880
(h) Item 30: Enter "This abbreviated form issued to Army National Guard members per appendix A, this AR [Army Regulation]" on all abbreviated DD Forms 214 issued. Noncontinuous periods of active duty are summarized on separate DD Forms 214; therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to amend his existing DD Form 214 to include the second period of activation from 7 April 1968 to 11 April 1968. (d) Item 17a: "Other" block will be checked and enter "call Executive...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017822
The applicant requests, in effect, that item 17a (Current Active Service Other than by Induction) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that was issued on 24 September 1969 be corrected to show that he was ordered to active duty (AD) instead of ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA). The applicant essentially states that his DD Form 214 that was issued on 24 September 1969, which will simply be referred to as his second DD Form 214...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644
The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicants period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state self explanatory. b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009492
The applicant requests, in effect, that the entry in item 17a (Current Active Service Other Than by Induction/Source of Entry) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 14 July 1969 be corrected. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. DISCUSSION...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005697
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows he was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 4 September 1968. The applicant contends that item 17 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected because he was ordered to active duty and not "Ordered to ACDUTRA."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065224C070421
The Report of Separation and Record of Service (NGB Form 22) that he was furnished at the time of his discharge from the AZARNG shows that he was discharged for the purpose of being ordered to active duty under the provisions of Public Law 89-687 and Department of the Army Circular 135-10. The evidence of record shows that he was ordered to active duty by direction of the President and his DD Form 214 should be amended to reflect the appropriate information. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012190
The applicant states, in effect, that item 17c, of his DD Form 214, has a strikeover and item 22a(1), 22a(3), and 22b show the incorrect years of service. Item 17c, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "9 Sep 66" (9 September 1966), which is correct; however, as indicated by the applicant, does contain a "strikeover." Item 22a(1) will be completed by entering the total service completed in item 10c (Dated Inducted) or 17c (Date of Entry) and 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008051
Item 22a(1) properly shows the total amount of service completed between 28 June 1968 (inclusive date of current tour of duty) through 24 August 1973, a period of 5 years, 1 month, and 27 days. Item 22a(2) properly shows the total amount of service in the USAR DEP (2 June to 10 September 1967) and enlisted time from 11 September 1967 to 27 June 1968. The evidence of record he served in an enlisted status from 11 September 1967 through 27 June 1968.