Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001796
Original file (20130001796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  10 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001796 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 10c (Date Inducted) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the date 8 May 1968 instead of "NA." 

2.  The applicant states the date of induction is not listed on his DD Form 214.  This error makes it appear that he had less than the full 6 years of service and prevents him from using his Department of Veterans Affairs benefits.  He was inducted on 8 May 1968 and even made some meetings before being sent to Fort Polk, LA on 27 July 1968. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 6 years on 9 May 1968.  

3.  On 9 July 1968, Headquarters, 3rd U.S. Army, Atlanta, GA, ordered him to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) for completion of training.  The orders stipulated that upon completion of ACDUTRA, he would return to his Reserve unit. 

4.  He entered ACDUTRA on 27 July 1968 and successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training at Fort Polk, LA, and he was awarded military occupational specialty 64A (Light Vehicle Driver).  

5.  He was honorably released from ACDUTRA on 26 November 1968 to the control of the USAR.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 months of active service.  His DD Form 214 further shows in:

* Item 10c - NA
* Item 11ds (Effective Date (of Separation)) - 26 November 1968
* Item 17c (Date of Entry (on Active Duty)) - 27 July 1968 

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in part, that item 11d shows the date the Soldier’s separation was accomplished.  Item 10c (for enlisted personnel) shows the date the Soldier was inducted. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Induction is not the same as enlistment.  At the time individuals of a certain age were registered through the Selective Service.  During a crisis and upon meeting moral, medical, and other criteria, draftees or inductees were involuntarily ordered to active duty.  Enlistment on the other hand is a voluntary action on behalf of the member. 

2.  The applicant was never inducted into the Army of the United States.  That is why item 10c of his DD Form 214 states "NA."  He actually enlisted in the USAR for a period of 6 years.  He entered active duty for training on 27 July 1968 and this date is correctly listed in item 17c of his DD Form 214.  He was honorably released from active duty on 26 November 1968 which is also correctly listed in item 11d.

3.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

4.  The dates of entry on and release from active duty are correctly listed on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_X____  ____X____  __X______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001796





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001796



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015025

    Original file (20130015025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17 (Current Active Service Other Than By Induction) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "Ordered To Active Duty" vice "Ordered To ACDUTRA [Active Duty For Training]." The regulation stated in: * Item 17 - check appropriate space to indicate means of entry on the current active service; for ACDUTRA personnel, check "other" and enter "Ordered To ACDUTRA" * Item 17b - for ACDUTRA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030369

    Original file (20100030369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows the following dates: * Item 10c (Date Inducted) - 7 February 1968 * Item 11d (Effective Date) - 27 October 1968 * Item 17c (Date of Entry - Enlistment) - 7 February 1968 4. Item 17c of the DD Form 214 he was issued on 11 August 1971 shows the date of his initial enlistment in the RA and not the first date of his immediate reenlistment on 28 October 1968. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007230

    Original file (20130007230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 January 1970 to show in: a. item 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of private (PV2)/E-2; b. item 16 (Terminal Date of Reserve), his terminal date as 22 September 1975 instead of 21 May 1975; c. item 17c (Date of Entry), he entered active duty on 22 September 1969 instead 10 September 1969; and d. item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015012

    Original file (20080015012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered active duty for training on 29 March 1967 and was honorably released from active duty on 29 July 1967. His DD Form 214 correctly shows the dates of entry and separation and the net period of active service. It appears that the applicant’s periods of service documented on the NA Form 13041 were performed as part of his USAR training obligation and could not be entered on the DD Form 214 as they occurred outside the period covered by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020425

    Original file (20140020425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 10c (Date Inducted) – 14 August 1970 * item 11d (Effective Date) – 13 August 1970 * item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) – 2 years 6. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant contends his date of induction and entry on active duty was 14 August 1968 and his DD Form 47 confirms this date. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027030

    Original file (20100027030.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 contained the following entries: * item 10c (Date Inducted) - 24 February 1971 * item 11d (Effective Date) - 28 April 1971 * item 17c (Date of Entry) - NA * item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) - 0 2 5 (zero years, 2 months, and 5 days 5. His service is computed by subtracting his date of induction date from his discharge date. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015034

    Original file (20080015034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the correct date of entry into active duty. The applicant provides a DD Form 214 and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 19 March 1974, in support of this application. It is evident there is an error in the applicant's DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013625

    Original file (20100013625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he completed 3 months and 6 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He was inducted on 10 February 1970 and was honorably discharged on 18 November 1970. Therefore, he completed 9 months and 2 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He enlisted on 19 November 1970 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000856

    Original file (20150000856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Nothing in his records shows he went overseas. c. His records show he completed training and he was awarded MOS 76A. There is no evidence that the applicant served overseas and he did not have an active status after 1981.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012190

    Original file (20080012190.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 17c, of his DD Form 214, has a strikeover and item 22a(1), 22a(3), and 22b show the incorrect years of service. Item 17c, of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "9 Sep 66" (9 September 1966), which is correct; however, as indicated by the applicant, does contain a "strikeover." Item 22a(1) will be completed by entering the total service completed in item 10c (Dated Inducted) or 17c (Date of Entry) and 11d (Effective Date) of the DD Form...