IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 November 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080013506
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he recently found out that when he was discharged he should have seen an orthopedic doctor for his right knee injury.
3. The applicant provides a letter, dated 16 July 2008, from the Disabled American Veterans, National Service Office in Phoenix, Arizona.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 14 August 1979 for a period of 6 years. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 September 1979 for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed basic combat training and advanced individual training in military occupational specialty 76Y (unit/organization supply specialist).
3. The applicants DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), dated
4 December 1981, shows his physical profile was 211121.
4. On 20 September 1982, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 2, for completion of required service and transferred to the USAR to complete his remaining obligation. On 13 August 1985, he was honorably discharged from the Ready Reserve.
5. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 2, in effect at the time, provided, in pertinent part, for the discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment, and other periods of active duty or active duty for training.
6. Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification action is warranted. Four numerical designations (1-4) are used to reflect different levels of functional capacity in six factors (PULHES): P-physical capacity or stamina, U-upper extremities, L-lower extremities, H-hearing and ears, E-eyes, and S-psychiatric. Numerical designator "1" under all factors indicates that an individual is considered to possess a high level of medical fitness and, consequently, is medically fit for any military assignment. Numerical designators "2" and "3" indicate that an individual has a medical condition or physical defect which requires certain restrictions in assignment within which the individual is physically capable of performing military duty. The individual should receive assignments commensurate with his or her functional capacity.
7. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.
8. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It states that the mere presence of an impairment does not, of itself, justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability. In each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the requirements of the duties the Soldier reasonably may be expected to perform because of his or her office, grade, or rank. It states that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. When a Soldier is being processed for separation for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement indicates that a Soldier is fit.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
There is no medical evidence of record that shows the applicant had any medical condition prior to his release from active duty on 20 September 1982. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was ever medically unfit to perform his duties. Therefore, there is no basis for granting a medical discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080013506
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080013506
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007238
Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification action is warranted. Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003865C070206
DA Form 2166-4 (Enlisted Efficiency Report), dated 12 December 1973, shows the FSM was rated "excellent" for duty performance. Although the applicant contends that the FSM had many episodes of sickness and debilitating problems while he was on active duty, and service medical records show he was hospitalized and treated for anemia and pancreatitis while in the Army, the FSM was found qualified for separation with a physical profile of 111121 by competent medical authorities on 29...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022103
The applicant requests his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded or, in effect, a medical discharge. However, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 May 1982 shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial on 14 May 1982 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. However, there is no evidence to show he could not perform his duties while serving on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001690
The applicant contends his undesirable discharge should be changed to a medical discharge because he was unable to perform his duties due to a back injury he incurred in Germany in 1975. The evidence of record shows he was found to be physically qualified for separation on 1 October 1976 with a physical profile of 113121. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show a medical discharge was warranted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017194
On 7 September 1977, the applicant failed to return from leave and report for duty in Germany. Since there is no evidence of record to show the applicant was ever medically unfit to perform his military duties, there was no basis for processing the applicant for a medical separation. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016931
The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Service medical records * VA medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical fitness), chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) provides that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003447C070205
Rowland Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Although the applicant contends that he was never supposed to be sent to Vietnam with a “P-3” and “U-3” medical profile, evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam (from 21 July 1966 through 17 July 1967) prior to receiving a physical profile of “3” under physical capacity or stamina and a physical profile of “3” under upper extremities on 26 September 1967....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007475
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her military records to show that she was retired due to physical disability. There is no available medical evidence showing that the applicant was medically unfit to perform the requirements of her rank at the time of her retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016693
The applicant requests that his honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge. Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090057C070212
Numerical designators "2" and "3" indicate that an individual has a medical condition or physical defect which requires certain restrictions in assignment within which the individual is physically capable of performing military duty. The evidence of record shows the applicant was sufficiently fit to reenlist again in 1976 and to be promoted to Specialist Five in 1977. All his available EERs show that he was physically fit and all rater comments indicated he was capable of performing his duties.