Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007475
Original file (20090007475.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  6 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007475 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her military records to show that she was retired due to physical disability.

2.  The applicant states that at the time of her voluntary early retirement, she suffered from a psychiatric condition that rendered her unable to perform the requirements of her rank.  She contends that since her separation, she has struggled with worsening depression and has been psychiatrically hospitalized.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of her application, a copy of a self-authored letter to her Member of Congress.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  At the time of her application, the applicant was retired from the Regular Army (RA) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.  Her military occupational specialty (MOS) was 71M (Chaplain Assistant).

3.  A DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record, Part I), prepared on 17 May 1994, shows the applicant's physical profile as 111111.

4.  The applicant's service medical records, to include her medical examination for retirement, are not available for review.

5.  On 31 August 1994, the applicant was retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12 (voluntary early retirement).  She had completed 16 years, 5 months, and 17 days of creditable active duty service. 

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of their office, rank, grade, or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

7.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 7, physical profiling, provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification action is warranted.  Four numerical designations (1-4) are used to reflect different levels of functional capacity in six factors (PULHES): P-physical capacity or stamina, U-upper extremities, L-lower extremities, H-hearing and ears, E-eyes, and S-psychiatric.  Numerical designator "1" under all factors indicates that an individual is considered to possess a high level of medical fitness and, consequently, is medically fit for any military assignment.  Numerical designators "2" and "3" indicate that an individual has a medical condition or physical defect which requires certain restrictions in assignment within which the individual is physically capable of performing military duty.  The individual should receive assignments commensurate with his or her functional capacity.  Numerical designator "4" indicates that an individual has one or more medical conditions or physical defects of such severity that performance of military duty must be drastically limited.  The numerical designator "4" does not necessarily mean that the individual is unfit because of physical disability as defined in Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation).

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to 
reasonably perform the duties of his/her office, grade, rank, or rating.  It provides for medical evaluation boards (MEB), which are convened to document a Soldier's medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty is affected by the Soldier's status.  A decision is made as to the Soldier's medical qualifications for retention based on the criteria in chapter 3 of Army Regulation 40-501.  If the MEB determines the Soldier does not meet retention standards, the board will recommend referral of the Soldier to a PEB (Physical Evaluation Board).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that she suffered from a psychiatric condition at the time of her voluntary early retirement.  She wants her records changed to show that she was retired due to a medical condition.

2.  There is no available medical evidence showing that the applicant was medically unfit to perform the requirements of her rank at the time of her retirement.  Three months prior to her retirement, her DA Form 2A recorded her physical profile as 111111.  The numerical designator "1" under all factors indicates that an individual is considered to possess a high level of medical fitness and, consequently, is medically fit for any military assignment.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  __x______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007475



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007475



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007237

    Original file (20080007237.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. There is no medical evidence of record that shows the applicant had any medical condition prior to her release from active duty on 16 May 1994. There is also no evidence of record to show she was ever medically unfit to perform her duties.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010672

    Original file (20080010672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no medical evidence of record that shows the applicant had any medical condition prior to his discharge on 13 February 1987. There is also no evidence of record to show he was ever medically unfit to perform his duties. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant was eligible for physical disability processing and there is no basis for a medical discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022360

    Original file (20120022360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A medical record, dated 25 March 1981, states if a pneumothorax recurs he should be medically discharged from the military at that time. The applicant provides service medical records. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010398

    Original file (20090010398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 provides, in pertinent part, that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his or her continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until he or she is scheduled for separation or retirement creates a presumption that he or she is fit. The evidence of record shows the applicant requested an early separation with a special separation benefit. The Army must find that a service member is physically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007991

    Original file (20100007991.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 February 1984, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, for completion of required active service. There are no service medical records available. Evidence of record shows the applicant's physical profile was 111111 on 25 May 1983, 2 years after his reported head injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004294

    Original file (20090004294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. There is no evidence to show that the applicant could not perform his duties while on active duty. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show a medical retirement was warranted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006136

    Original file (20090006136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he needs a medical discharge because of his feet. On 15 December 1989, the applicant consulted with counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10. Since there is no evidence of record to show the applicant was ever medically unfit to perform his military duties, there is no basis for granting a medical discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012985

    Original file (20110012985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was medically separated. A physical profile designator of "2" under any or all factors indicates that an individual possesses some medical condition or physical defect that may require some activity limitations. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091742C070212

    Original file (2003091742C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 3 November 2000 Report of Medical History showed she had indicated she had been raped by the first sergeant, that she had surgery on her foot in April 2000, and that she had spent time in a mental ward at a hospital in September 2000 and was treated for depression. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant stated in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009899

    Original file (20090009899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 September 2007, the applicant requested an honorable discharge from the USAR based upon the non-duty related medical disqualification. Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the...