Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011369
Original file (20080011369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011369 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his 20 April 1971 separation document (DD Form 214) be updated to reflect his last rank and by adding the Army Achievement Medal (AAM).  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he is requesting his rank be updated and the AAM be added to his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides his 20 April 1971 DD form 214; 1980 military occupational specialty (MOS) orders; 1978, 1979 and 1982 promotion orders; 1982 AAM orders; and his retirement certificate in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 5 July 1968, and was trained in and awarded MOS 95B (Military Police).  His record shows he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on
27 September 1969, and that this was the highest rank he held while serving on active duty.  

3.  On 20 April 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) after completing 2 years, 8 months, and 16 days of active military service, and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to complete his military service obligation.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms he held the rank of SP4 on the date of his separation, and that he had earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:  National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal (VSM); Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960); Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar; and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14 and M-16) Bar.  The applicant authenticated this document with his signature in Item 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged).  

4.  On 5 March 1977, the applicant enlisted in the USAR and continued to serve in that status until 3 March 1987, when he was honorably discharged, in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.  His Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows, in Item 18 (Appointment and Reductions), that during his tenure in the USAR, he was promoted to the following ranks on the dates indicated:  
specialist five (SP5)/E-5, 4 February 1978; staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6, 25 June 1979; and SFC, 17 April 1982.  His record also shows that he was awarded the AAM for meritorious service from 1 August 1981 through 12 March 1982.  

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on preparing and distributing the DD Form 214, and Paragraph 2-1 contains guidance on preparing the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty, and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  There are no provisions for correcting or amending a DD Form 214 to add information or to document events that took place during USAR service completed subsequent to the date of separation.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to update his rank and by adding the AAM was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty, and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  There are no regulation provisions that provide for documenting USAR service or events that take place subsequent to the period of active duty documented on a DD Form 214.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.  

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011369



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011369



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005348

    Original file (20140005348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Air Assault Badge * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (2nd Award) * he was honorably discharged * he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 * he served in the Delaware National Guard 2. As such, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his DEARNG service or his honorable discharge from the USAR. Absent orders which awarded him this medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014160

    Original file (20090014160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document also shows the applicant's rank was SP4. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was REFRAD in the rank of SP4/E-4 with a DOR of 9 July 1972 because he held that rank when he was separated from active duty and also at the time he was discharged from the USAR. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show the correct rank, grade, and DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082409C070215

    Original file (2002082409C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The date of award of this MOS is not of record.] A “Officer’s Commission” Certificate which states “…. Other than questionable documents submitted by the applicant, there is no documentation that the applicant was ever commissioned or served as a commissioned officer in either the Regular Army, the Reserve, or the National Guard.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019927

    Original file (20090019927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 16 July 1979, while serving in the rank of SFC, a special court martial (SPCM) found the applicant guilty of violating the following Articles of the UCMJ: * 2 specifications – Article 132, for preparing fraudulent claims against the United States on 10 October 1978 in the amount of $871.36, and on 8 November 1978, in the amount of $1,729.00 * 2 specifications – Article 107, for with the intent to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011389

    Original file (20080011389.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) to show the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B4X, and the Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) of "H" on his MOS of 91B. The applicant requests the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, MOS 11B4X, and the MOS of 91B4H be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090165C070212

    Original file (2003090165C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 31 July 1980 to 15 July 1983. a. by showing that the individual concerned was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 (SP4) on 1 February 1982, that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017431

    Original file (20110017431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 263, issued by the same headquarters, dated 21 November 1969, promoted him to the temporary rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 shows the following entries: RANK/GRADE DATE OF RANK Private (PV1)/E-1 (P) 9 September 1968 PV2/E-2 (P) 4 January 1969 PFC/E-3 (P) 24 February 1969 SP4/E-4 (T) 5 November 1969 SGT/E-5 (T) 21 November 1969 10. Item 5a and b of this form shows his rank/grade was SGT/E-5 at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017516

    Original file (20080017516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's records confirm he held the rank of PFC at the time of his REFRAD on 17 February 1983, and this is the rank properly reflected on the DD Form 214 he was issued upon his separation from active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029103

    Original file (20100029103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * Items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) the entries "SP4" and "E-4" respectively * Item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "10 May 1971" 14. However, his separation orders listed his rank as a SP4 and his DD Form 214 also listed his rank and grade as a SP4/E-4, effective 10 May 1971. The available evidence is insufficient to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was promoted to or released from active duty in the rank of SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007968

    Original file (20120007968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests update of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 24 August 1982 to reflect her correct rank, military occupational specialty, years of service, decorations, military education and foreign service. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for...