Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017431
Original file (20110017431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  13 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017431 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank/grade as sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.

2.  The applicant states he was a senior demolition sergeant assigned to Detachment A, 46th Special Forces Company, and that his rank should have been SFC.  He further states his records indicate he should have been a SFC.

3.  The applicant provides page three of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to 


timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 September 1968 for a period of 3 years.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and later 12B (Combat Engineer).

3.  Unit Orders Number 10, issued by Company A, 4th Battalion, 3rd Advanced Individual Training Brigade, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Lewis, WA, dated 24 February 1969, advanced him to the permanent (P) rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3.

4.  Special Orders Number 249, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army, John F. Kennedy Center for Military Assistance, Fort Bragg, NC, dated 5 November 1969, advanced him to the temporary (T) rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

5.  Special Orders Number 256, issued by the same headquarters, dated
14 November 1969, awarded him primary MOS 12B3P and secondary MOS 11B2P.

6.  Special Orders Number 263, issued by the same headquarters, dated
21 November 1969, promoted him to the temporary rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

7.  Special Orders Number 267, issued by the same headquarters, dated
25 November 1969, awarded special qualification identifier "S," indicating Special Forces qualified.  This order also redesignated his MOS as 12B4S.

8.  He was assigned to various stateside assignments and he served a tour of duty in Vietnam with the 46th Special Forces (SF) Company from 10 November 1970 to 21 September 1971.

9.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 shows the following entries:

		RANK/GRADE					DATE OF RANK
Private (PV1)/E-1 (P)
9 September 1968
PV2/E-2 (P)
4 January 1969
PFC/E-3 (P)
24 February 1969
SP4/E-4 (T)
5 November 1969
SGT/E-5 (T)
21 November 1969
10.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 list his last principal duty, on 17 May 1971, as "SF Engineer SGT (E-7)."

11.  His records do not contain official orders promoting him to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 or to SFC/E-7.

12.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 
22 September 1971 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  Item 5a and b of this form shows his rank/grade was SGT/E-5 at the time of his separation and his date of rank as 21 November 1969.

13.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, provided for the temporary promotion of enlisted personnel of the Active Army to pay grades E-4 through E-6, made against periodic temporary promotion quota allocations.  The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of specific time in grade and time service requirements.  Permanent promotion to pay grade E-5, during the period in question, required 1 year time in grade and
6 years time in service.  This regulation further states in:

	a.  Paragraph 7-2 (Authority to promote) that the promotion authority for assigned personnel for promotion to pay grades E-7, E-8, and E-9 is delegated to commanders of organizations authorized a commander in the rank of colonel or higher.  For separate detachments, companies, or battalions, the promotion authority will be retained at the next senior headquarters within the chain of command which is authorized a commander in the rank of colonel or higher.

	b.  paragraph 7-3 (Orders) that temporary advancement/promotion of enlisted personnel to all grades above E-3, permanent promotions, lateral appointments, and grade reductions will be announced in orders.

14.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  Chapter 2 contains the guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214 will be the Enlisted Qualification Record or any other document authorized for filing in the Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) or Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).


15.  Army Regulation 635-5 further states that item 5a and b would reflect the individual’s rank/grade at time of separation and that if the rank/grade at the time of separation was not the permanent grade, the permanent rank/grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment, would be entered in item 30 (remarks).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  At the time of the applicant's service the regulations allowed for the temporary advancement/promotion of active duty enlisted personnel to pay grades E-4 through E-6.  These advancements/promotions were made against periodic temporary promotion quota allocations.  The temporary appointments became permanent on the date of completion of specific time in grade and time service requirements.  It appears he met these requirements for the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 because this grade and rank are reflected on his DD Form 214. 

2.  The regulation also states that temporary advancement/promotion of enlisted personnel to all grades above E-3, permanent promotions, lateral appointments, and grade reductions will be announced in orders.  His record does not contain orders promoting him above the grade/rank of SGT/E-5.

3.  Item 38 of his DA Form 20 list his last principal duty on 17 May 1971 as
"SF Engineer SGT (E-7)."  This entry is referencing his duty position, not his rank/grade.  This entry indicates he was filling an SFC/E-7 position; however, holding the position does not entitle him to the associated grade/rank of SFC/E-7.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017431



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017431



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025228

    Original file (20110025228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Special Orders Number 120, dated 30 April 1969, show he was promoted to the temporary grade of SSG. Items 5a and 5b, enter the rank/grade in which a member was serving at the time of separation with an indication if permanent or temporary; for example "SSG (T) (Staff Sergeant, Temporary), SGT (P)." However, Army regulations allow Soldiers serving in a temporary grade at the time of separation to have that temporary grade entered on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003304

    Original file (20130003304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a. correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * he attended the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Academy * he completed Advanced Individual Training (AIT) for military occupational specialty (MOS) 11E (Armor Crewman) * he held MOS 11E * the related civilian occupation for his MOS * he completed high school * the 7 months he served in Germany * his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * unit and individual awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017768

    Original file (20120017768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided Elvis Presley's (SGT Presley) DD Form 214 which shows SGT Presley was drafted into the Army of the United States on 24 March 1958. Additionally, he states he had a better service record than SGT Presley. The ABCMR considers cases based on the evidence in an applicant's service record and the evidence they provide to support and strengthen the case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016291

    Original file (20090016291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This form also shows his rank as Specialist 2 (T) [temporary] with a date of rank of 19 December 1955. A copy of a noncommissioned officer (NCO)/specialist program appointment letter, dated 13 March 1957, states the applicant's personnel records indicated he converted to a specialist status on or about 1 July 1955; however, there was no record of his acceptance or declination of the rank designation. The applicant also states that he does not know what rank a SP5 is.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003198

    Original file (20080003198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no Special Orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record further shows that, during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant was issued an order awarding him an MOS that indicates he was appointed in a higher grade. In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the applicant the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011575

    Original file (20110011575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably retired in the rank of SFC (pay grade E-6) on 28 February 1961. The evidence shows he was promoted to the rank of SFC, pay grade E-6, on 19 May 1944. There is no evidence to show he was ever promoted to the pay grade of E-7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011513C070208

    Original file (20040011513C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has orders dated 23 May 1969 promoting him to E-5. He was reviewed by a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT, E-5 by a majority of the board's membership. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029103

    Original file (20100029103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * Items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) the entries "SP4" and "E-4" respectively * Item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "10 May 1971" 14. However, his separation orders listed his rank as a SP4 and his DD Form 214 also listed his rank and grade as a SP4/E-4, effective 10 May 1971. The available evidence is insufficient to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was promoted to or released from active duty in the rank of SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010262

    Original file (20080010262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was reassigned from the Retired Reserve to the Ready Reserve by authority of Department of the Army, Office of the Adjutant General, U.S. Army Administration Center, St. Louis, MO Letter Orders Number 07-20141, dated 26 July 1971, in the rank of SFC. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant, while on active duty in the Regular Army, was promoted to SFC/E-7 on 29 August 1969, and that this is the highest rank and pay grade he held on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018209

    Original file (20130018209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * he was assigned as a Drill Instructor and awarded the associated military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 includes an entry showing he was assigned to HHD, 2nd Battalion, 1st Brigade, Fort Jackson, SC, in duty MOS 00F4O Drill Sergeant, effective 3 August 1970. The applicant’s...