Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007968
Original file (20120007968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
`
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 23 October 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120007968 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests update of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 24 August 1982 to reflect her correct rank, military occupational specialty, years of service, decorations, military education and foreign service.

2.  The applicant states her DD Form 214 does not reflect her advancement in grade, accomplishments, decorations, or foreign service.  She goes on to state the DD Form 214 is a special document and it should reflect her service as a veteran.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 22 February 1988
* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 3 December 1981
* DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 18 November 1984
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), prepared on 3 December 1981 and last reviewed by the applicant on 21 April 1987
* Standard form (SF) 601 (Immunization Record)
* SF 608 (Health Record – Dental)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG) on 3 December 1981 for a period of 6 years.  She was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) on 29 March 1982 and was transferred to Fort McClellan, AL for her basic training.  She completed her basic training and she was transferred to Fort Jackson, SC for her advanced individual training (AIT) in military occupational specialty 71L (administrative specialist).

3.  She completed her AIT and she was honorably released from IADT on
24 August 1982.  She was returned to her ILARNG unit.  The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows she completed 4 months and 26 days of net active service during this period.

4.  On 18 November 1984, the applicant was advanced to the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.   On 22 February 1988, she was honorably discharged from the ILARNG under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) by reason of unsatisfactory participation.  She was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete her remaining Reserve obligation.  She was issued an NGB Form 22 that appropriately reflects her rank, service, education, and awards.  It does not provide a field for entry of foreign service.  Additionally, her official record shows and she did not provide any evidence of foreign service performed during her military service.

5.  On 5 December 1990, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information that is current as of the effective date of separation.  Changes that occur subsequent to the effective date of the DD Form 214 are not authorized for retroactive entry on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that her DD Form 214 should be updated to reflect her service and complete military accomplishments has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  The DD Form 214 is prepared to reflect information that is current and in effect at the time of release or discharge from active duty.  Changes that occur subsequent to the issuance of the DD Form 214 are not authorized for retroactive entry on the DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant's NGB Form 22 serves to reflect her accomplishments in the ILARNG; therefore, there is no error or injustice in her case.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007968



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120007968



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009726

    Original file (20120009726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and her National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) be "updated" to show all of her training and the exact dates of "tours." It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. A DD Form 214 is issued to Reserve component (RC) Soldiers who complete IADT with award of an MOS, complete 90...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008553

    Original file (20080008553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the character of service reflected on his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) be upgraded from uncharacterized to honorable. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004354

    Original file (20080004354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged from the ILARNG on 16 April 2003 and subsequently enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 April 2003: a. in order to credit the applicant with her IADT from 4 June 2002 to 16 August 2002, recorded on the DD Form 220, her date entered on active duty this period was adjusted to account for those days and is therefore correctly shown as “2003 02 04” and requires no further action; b. she was released from active duty on 16 April 2007. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013819

    Original file (20090013819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed 34 weeks of active duty for training (ADT). On 11 June 1983, the U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, published Orders T-06-318967, ordering the applicant to ADT for a period of 61 days, effective 11 August 1983 (later amended to show 11 July 1983), completion of the Medical Services Officer Basic Course with attachment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003992

    Original file (20110003992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement about her life, family, financial situation, and other issues * VA letter, dated 2 November 1984 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * MIARNG discharge letter, dated 3 February 1982 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) * Enlistment and discharge Standard Forms (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History) * SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination) prepared at the time of enlistment and discharge * Enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004060

    Original file (20130004060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states as part of her enlistment contract, in the bonus addendum, she was entitled to receive a $20,000.00 bonus. An exception to policy (ETP) memorandum was approved on 6 September 2013 by the ARNG for the applicant to retain the $10,000.00 NPSEB offered at the time of her enlistment, but payment of the remaining $5,000.00 was not made due to her accepting a MilTech position on 5 September 2012. c. The anniversary payment for this bonus was scheduled for payment on 26 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012067

    Original file (20080012067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 2 (Social Security Number) of the applicant's DD Form 214 has the number 358-**-****. The number that was used as his social security number on the DD Form 214 was 358-**-***. Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is not entitled to a correction of his record to show the number 354-**-**** as his social security number.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026044

    Original file (20100026044.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her earlier request for correction to item 18 (Remarks) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 11 June 1982 where it states, "1 day excess leave from 4 October 1981 to 5 October 1981." As new issues, she requests: a. in effect, correction of item 26 (Separation Code) of her 1982 DD Form 214 and award of a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) incentive under the Student Loan Repayment Program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012835

    Original file (20080012835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her Report of Separation and Record of Service (NGB Form 22) be corrected to show that she enlisted in the year 1981; that her date of rank to sergeant was before 1999; and that she was available for signature at the time that her NGB Form 22 was signed. The Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) that she was furnished at the time of her release from ADT shows that she completed 5 months and 1 day of net active service this period. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001414

    Original file (20120001414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and Earnings Statement for a payment on 30 August 1996 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) with an effective date of 15 November 1996 * Certificate of Retirement, dated 13 March 2006 * Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement prepared on 14 October 2008 * letter from Transition and Separations Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC),...