Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009804
Original file (20080009804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009804 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to read an additional of 1 year, 1 month, and 24 days, for a total of 3 years, 10 months, and 5 days active service.  She also requests, in effect, that the spelling of her last name shown on the DD Form 214 include an "s" at the end.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that her Chronological Statement of Retirement Points (AHRC Form 249-2-E), dated 1 June 2006, reflects the correct amount of her active duty and proper spelling of her last name.  She also states that correction to her active duty service and the reissue of a DD Form 214 is required in order for her to receive full entitlement of creditable service to be applied to her leave earnings and retirement computation as a federal government employee.

3.  In support of her application, the applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214 and Chronological Statement of Retirement Points. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant requested correction of the spelling of her last name on her DD Form 214 to include an "s" at the end.  On 31 December 2008, the applicant was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), correcting the spelling of her last name to include an "s" at the end.  Therefore, this issue will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

3.  The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), in pay grade E-3, on 2 June 1977.  

4.  The applicant was ordered to active duty (AD) in support of Operation Noble Eagle with a reporting date of 8 October 2001, for a period not to exceed 365 days.  On 5 September 2002, the period of AD was extended not to exceed 730 days.  The applicant's records do not show she was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of AD.

5.  The applicant was again was ordered to AD for a period of 90 days, for the purpose of AD medical extension.  She entered AD on 8 October 2003.  

6.  The applicant was released from AD at the completion of her required active service on 18 June 2004 and transferred to the Retired Reserve.  She was issued a DD Form 214 that shows in Item 12a (Date Entered AD This Period) she entered active duty on 8 October 2003.  Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) shows she was credited with 8 months and 11 days net active service.   Item 12d she was credited with 2 years total prior active service.

7.  The applicant submitted a copy of her AHRC Form 249-2-E, dated 1 June 2006, that shows she served in continuous enlisted service in the USAR from her Retirement Year (RY) beginning 2 June 1977 through the RY ending (RYE) 1 June 2005.  She was credited with 26 years and 17 days qualifying service for retirement as of her RYE ending 1 June 2005.  Her records also contain an APRC Form 249-2-E (same title), dated 31 December 2008, that reflects the same data.

8.  Both the 2006 and 2008 statements show she was credited with 236 active duty points from her RY 2 June 2001 to 1 June 2002, 364 points from 2 June 2002 to 1 June 2003, and 365 points from 2 June 2003 to 1 June 2004.

9.  The applicant's ARPC Form 249-2-E, dated 31 December 2008, also shows she served in continuous enlisted service in the USAR from RY 2 June 1977 through 1 June 2005.  

10.  Army Regulation 635-5, governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  This regulation specifies that post-service benefits, final pay, and retirement credit, will be based on the information contained in Item 12 (Record of Service).  Item 12d will contain the total amount of prior active military service less lost time, if any, taken from previously-issued DD Forms 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2001, the applicant was ordered to AD with a reporting date no later than 8 October 2001.  In September 2002, this period of AD was extended from 365 days to a period not to exceed 730 days.  There is no evidence that the applicant was provided a DD Form 214 for her AD beginning on 8 October 2001.  There is also no evidence when this period of active duty service ended and for what reason after it had been extended.  Orders were published showing she was ordered to AD on 8 October 2003 and released on 18 June 2004.  She was provided a DD Form 214 for the period 8 October 2003 to 18 June 2004 to support 8 months and 11 days active duty service.  

2.  The applicant's contentions that she served on AD for an additional 1 year, 1 month, and 24 days have been noted and found to have merit.  It appears that no DD Form 214 for her AD service from 8 October 2001 through 7 October 2003, a period of 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days, was prepared.  In addition, she was not given the proper credit for this period of service on her DD Form 214 with an ending date of 18 June 2004.  Therefore, based on the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction to her DD Form 214, Item 12a, to show she entered active duty on 8 October 2001.  She is also entitled to correction to Item 12c to show 2 years, 8 months, and 10 days, the combined total of her period of AD service from 8 October 2010 through 18 June 2004.  

3.  There is no evidence the applicant served on active duty for any other period other than the period from 8 October 2001 through 18 June 2004 for which she was issued a DD Form 214, and she has not shown otherwise.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction to Items 12c to show that she completed 3 years, 10 months, and 5 days active service, and item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) should be amended to reflect "0000 00 00."

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 18 June 2004:

     a.  in Item 12a to show she entered active duty on 8 October 2001;

     b.  in Item 12c to show a credit of 2 years, 8 months, and 10 days;

     c.  in Item 12c to show "0000 00 00"; and

     d.  by providing the applicant a corrected separation document.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction of Items 12d of her DD Form 214 to show a credit of 3 years, 10 months, and 5 days.




      __________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009804



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009804


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020701

    Original file (20120020701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 September 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120020701 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the 89 days she completed under Title 10 orders. The available evidence shows the applicant received properly-constituted DD Forms 214 for her periods of active service from 12 November 2007 to 8 September 2009 and from 28 October 2011 to 21 September 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023788

    Original file (20100023788.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 January 2009 to show: a. in item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) the entry "20030225"; b. in item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) the entry "051021"; and c. in item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) "100407." Her records show through orders, amendments to those orders, a memorandum requesting the voiding and removal of an erroneous DD Form 214,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002769

    Original file (20120002769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * her correct service * completion of postal training 2. The applicant provides her DD Form 214 for the period ending 27 December 2005. Her DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in: * Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) This Period) - 2005 11 01 * Item 12b (Separation date This Period) - 2005 12 27 * Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) - 0001 01 27 * Item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100649C070208

    Original file (2004100649C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Patrick McGann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of item 12a (Date entered AD [Active Duty] This Period) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show 13 April 1983; correction of item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) to show 20 years and 18 days; and correction of item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) to show the entry, "0000 00 00." ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004354

    Original file (20080004354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was discharged from the ILARNG on 16 April 2003 and subsequently enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 April 2003: a. in order to credit the applicant with her IADT from 4 June 2002 to 16 August 2002, recorded on the DD Form 220, her date entered on active duty this period was adjusted to account for those days and is therefore correctly shown as “2003 02 04” and requires no further action; b. she was released from active duty on 16 April 2007. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017263

    Original file (20110017263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows in: * item 12b, (Separation date this period), 6 August 1983 * item 12c, (Net Active Service this Period), 1 month and 10 days * item 12d, (Total Prior Active Service), 2 months and 6 days * 3. A calculation for the above periods under review shows the following: 1983 08 06 released from AD - 1983 06 27 entered AD for training = 00 01 09 + 01 day inclusive = 00 01 10 time on AD (Net Active Service) + ____ 02 06 prior AD service = 00 03 16 1996 11 02...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003711

    Original file (20090003711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 that shows while a member of the USAR, she entered active duty on 22 May 1989. The evidence further confirms that when the applicant was issued her DD Form 214, on 19 April 1993, the she had completed a total of 6 years, 3 months, and 29 days of prior inactive service. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020420

    Original file (20090020420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) This Period) shows the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The evidence of record shows the applicant entered ADT on or around 27 June 2006 and was released from ADT on or around 15 December 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by preparing and issuing the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003283

    Original file (20120003283.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) to show her retirement year (RY) period as September – September instead of May - May. Her ARPC Forms 249-E, dated 18 November 2009 and 14 December 2009, show her RY period as 15 April to 15 April. b. Paragraph 6.3.2 states members of a Reserve component in an active status, including service in a DEP, are credited retirement point credit for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001880

    Original file (20090001880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After completing 7 months and 20 days of net active service this period, the applicant was honorably discharged on 18 September 2007, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8, due to parenthood. The DD Form 214 that the applicant was furnished, on 18 September 2007, erroneously shows she entered AD this period on 29 October 2001; that she completed 5 years, 10 months and 20 days of net active service this period; that she had no total prior active service; that she had...