Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005647
Original file (20080005647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        04 SEPTEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005647 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and the "Connelly Award."

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he received these awards when he served with the 295th Aviation Company at Coleman Barracks in Germany.  

3.  The applicant did not provide additional documentary evidence in support of this application.    

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  On 10 September 1980, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program (DEP) for 6 years.  On 29 September 1980, he was discharged from the DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed training requirements and was awarded military occupational specialty 94B (Cook).  On 20 September 1983, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).  On 28 September 1986, he was honorably discharged from the USAR upon completion of his statutory military obligation. 
 
3.  The applicant was assigned to Germany from 18 May 1982 – 3 May 1983.  He performed duties as a cook with the 295th Aviation Company.

4.  There are no orders in the applicant's official records showing he was recommended for or awarded the AAM.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the AAM.  There is no evidence the applicant received the "Connelly Award." 

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the armed forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.

6.  The Philip A. Connelly Awards are cosponsored annually by the Department of the Army and the International Food Service executives Association (IFSEA).  Named after a former IFSEA president, the Philip A. Connelly Awards began in 1968 to recognize outstanding Army food service on the job.  The competition's 
5 categories are Active Army Small Dining Facilities (serving 200 or fewer per meal), the Active Army Large Dining Facilities (serving 201 or more), Active Army Field Kitchen in Field Operations, USAR Units and Army National Guard Units in Field Kitchen Operations.  The IFSEA provides the winner and runner-up trophies in each category and national recognition through the IFSEA organization.

7.  Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 29 September 1980 through 20 September 1983.  

2.  There is no evidence in the applicant's official record to show he was recommended for or awarded the AAM.  The applicant did not submit any evidence to support his contention that he received the AAM.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant an AAM, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the AAM by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

3.  There is no evidence in the applicant's record to show that he participated in the annual Philip A. Connelly Awards competition or that his unit won the competition in any of the categories.  For the applicant's information, this award is not listed in Army Regulation 600-8-22 as an approved Army award that is annotated on the DD Form 214.  

4.  Given the above, there is no basis to grant the applicant's request.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit any evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION











BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005647





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005647



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011706C070206

    Original file (20050011706C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011378

    Original file (20140011378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to a general or an honorable discharge. An Application for Discharge for the Good of the Service Under the Provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations, Enlisted Personnel) memorandum, dated 3 March 1983, wherein the applicant's commander was notified of the applicant's submission of a request for discharge for the good of the service. When authorized, it was issued to a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022666

    Original file (20110022666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states: * General Orders (GO) Number 5057 authorized him award of the AGCM * Unit Orders (UO) Number 49 show he qualified with the .38 caliber pistol * he should be awarded the Cold War Victory Commemorative Medal because he meets the criteria for this award * he completed all required training to receive a Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60) and Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Tank Weapons Bar * he was awarded a certificate of achievement for personal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001745

    Original file (20140001745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. he completed Airborne training; b. he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Combat Patch for service during mission Urgent Fury in Grenada, six awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and awards of the Humanitarian Service Medal (HSM) for service in Grenada in 1983 and for security operations in Fort Indiantown Gap, PA during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006666

    Original file (20110006666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). With respect to the BSM, based upon his application, the evidence of record, and accompanying supporting documents he has submitted, it does not appear that the applicant was recommended for or awarded the BSM. In order to request an award under 10 USC 1130, he must submit a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103323C070208

    Original file (2004103323C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was reduced in rank as a result of a medical condition that was beyond his control. During this counseling, the applicant was notified that his duty performance was below the standards of a noncommissioned officer with his time in service and rank. Therefore, this Board has determined that his reduction in rank based on inefficiency was appropriate.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605898C070209

    Original file (9605898C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as SSG (Staff Sergeant), his pay grade as E-6, and his secondary specialty as 94Z50, Food Service Supervisor, and his related civilian occupation, Food Service Supervisor. The applicant’s DD Form 214 should be changed to show his rank as SSG, his pay grade as E-6, his primary specialty 94B40, and his secondary specialty, 94Z50. In view of the foregoing findings and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008070

    Original file (AR20130008070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 8 January 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130008070 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01818

    Original file (BC-2004-01818.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On March 8, 1990, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. In his response dated 24 October 2004, he provided a personal statement, and a copy of his separation document, four (4) character reference letters, and duplicate copies of his awards and citations previously submitted with his original application (Exhibit E). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011452

    Original file (20080011452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show she was awarded the Army Achievement Medal. In a self-authored statement, dated 23 June 2008, the applicant states that she was promised an award of the Army Achievement Medal during her assignment to the 103rd Military Intelligence Battalion in Germany for painting artistic murals inside the dining facility and creating visual posters that were laminated and decorated...