RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01818
INDEX CODE: 110.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to
Honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not the best airman serving in the Air Force, however since that
time he has served in the Michigan National Guard from February 2000 to May
2001. He has also served in the United States Army from June 2001 to
September 2004, and received three Army Achievement Medals, two Letters of
Recognition, and one Certificate of Achievement. He will soon receive his
first Good Conduct Medal for three years of meritorious service. He has
served one tour overseas in Korea where he was instrumental in his unit
receiving the Philip A. Connelly Award for Food Service Excellence, and
placing third in the Army worldwide competition. He is working on his
Associate’s Degree in Culinary Arts, and is an active member in both his
home church in Michigan and Arizona, where he is presently stationed. He
returned to the military service to show his hard work and prove his
dedication to his country.
In support of the application, the applicant submits his personal
statement, a copy of his Army Achievement medals (3) and award
recommendation sheets (3), a copy of his Team 19 Certificate of
Achievement, a copy of his Merit Citation, a copy of his Finalist
Recognition Certificate, a copy of an excerpted newspaper article, a copy
of Unit/Mess Section Challenges/Success, and a copy of a base newsletter.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 7 October 1987, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the
age of 18 in the grade of airman first class (E-3) for a period of four (4)
years.
On 12 August 1988, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to
maintain Air Force dress standards. On 9 October 1988, he received a
Letter of Counseling for being late for duty. On 13 October 1988, he
received a LOR for twice failing to take his end of course exam because he
failed to have his training record on hand.
On 15 November 1988, he received a LOR for failing to obey the order of a
superior NCO. On 23 November 1988, he received a Letter of Counseling for
substandard duty performance. On 19 December 1988, he received a
Memorandum for Record for failing to maintain the grill in a clean and
orderly appearance, despite repeated instruction to do so.
On 3 January 1989, he received a Memorandum for Record for failing to wash
and clean a van, in violation of repeated instructions to do so. On 30
January 1989, he received both a Letter or Counseling and Memorandum for
Record for failing to report for duty at the prescribed time and with his
fatigue uniform not in compliance with AFR 35-10, and did thereafter fail
to iron his fatigue uniform as ordered.
On 8 February 1989, the applicant was tried by a summary court-martial and
contrary to his plea of not guilty, found guilty of being derelict in the
performance of his duties in that he negligently failed to maintain his
room according to dormitory standards. He was sentenced to seven days of
confinement.
On 14 February 1989, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was
recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of
AFR 39-10 for Misconduct – A Pattern of Misconduct – Discreditable
Involvement with Military or Civil Authorities. The applicant acknowledged
receipt of the notification, consulted counsel, and waived his right to
submit statements in his own behalf. The discharge case file was reviewed
by the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate, and was found legally sufficient.
The discharge authority approved the recommendation and directed that the
applicant be discharged from the service and furnished a General (Under
Honorable Conditions) discharge.
On 24 February 1989, the applicant was discharged Under Honorable
Conditions (General) for Misconduct – Pattern Discreditable Involvement
with Military or Civil Authorities. He served 1 year, 4 months, and 11
days on active duty. He had seven days of lost time due to confinement.
On March 8, 1990, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force
Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be
upgraded to honorable. The AFRDB stated the discharge was consistent with
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and
was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and the applicant was
provided full administrative due process. AFDRB concluded there was no
legal or equitable basis for upgrade of the discharge and determined that
the discharge should not be upgraded.
In response to the Board’s request, the FBI indicated they were unable to
identify an arrest record pertaining to the applicant on the basis of
information furnished (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states, based on the documentation
on file in the master personnel record, the discharge was consistent with
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation,
and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. DPPRS notes the
applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices
to his character of service.
DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for
review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit D). On 5 October 2004, the applicant was
invited to submit information pertaining to his post-service
accomplishments. In his response dated 24 October 2004, he provided a
personal statement, and a copy of his separation document, four (4)
character reference letters, and duplicate copies of his awards and
citations previously submitted with his original application (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. We have thoroughly reviewed the circumstances surrounding the
applicant’s discharge and find no evidence to show the applicant’s
discharge was erroneous or unjust. Nevertheless, in view of the evidence
provided by the applicant pertaining to his post-Air Force accomplishments,
including a successful adjustment to civilian life, a period of honorable
service in the Regular Army, and his current active membership in the Army
National Guard, we are of the opinion that upgrading his discharge to
honorable based on clemency would be appropriate. Accordingly, we
recommend that the applicant’s general discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 24 February 1989 he was honorably
discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 18 January 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Panel Member
Mr. Lanny Cawthon, Panel Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2004-01818.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 01 Jun 04.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 June 04.
Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 July 2004; and
AFBCMR, dated 5 October 2004.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, undated, w/atchs.
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-01818
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 24 February 1989, he
was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge
certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review
Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03548
Applicant was discharged on 29 February 1988, in the grade of airman basic with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge, in accordance with AFR 39-10 (Misconduct - Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions). The applicant submitted a request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his general (under honorable conditions) discharge upgraded to honorable. Therefore, based on the information and evidence provided they recommend the applicant's request be denied (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-004334
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00434 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not submit any...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03404
On 6 January 1989, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. On 18 February 1988, the applicant received a No-Show Letter for failing to report for a scheduled appointment on 11 January 1988. p. On 18 February 1988, the applicant received a UIF entry for his delinquent account with the NCO Club. In regard to the RE code, the applicant has not provided any evidence showing that the assigned RE code was in error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01254
For this misconduct, he received a Record of Counseling dated 4 June 1988. On 8 September 1989, after consulting with counsel, applicant waived his right to submit a statement. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization, which is correct.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02039
The base legal office reviewed the case file and found it legally sufficient to support the discharge and recommended an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without probation and rehabilitation (P&R). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00140
At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03007
On 10 December 1990, the applicant submitted a request to his commander that he be discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 2 August 1991, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to general. We have reviewed the evidence provided and are unable to conclude corrective action is warranted based on an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01950
On 21 July 1989, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01255
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 February 1951, the former member enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of four (4) years. On 12 December 1955, the former member submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFRDB) requesting his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00623
The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his character of service. As of this date, this office has received no response. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.