Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011452
Original file (20080011452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       12 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011452 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Achievement Medal.

2.  The applicant states that she was promised the award by two staff sergeants for painting three murals in the dining facility in Wurzburg, Germany, in 1995, and that she spent her time, money, and effort to create the murals for them.  She adds that she never received the medal because she was flown back to the United States and was ultimately discharged for physical disability.  She further adds that the only evidence is the three murals inside the dining facility in Germany and her word.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement, dated 23 June 2008, in support of her request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 2 June 1994.  She completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B (Food Service Specialist).  She was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability on 22 January 1996.  The highest rank/grade she attained during her military service was private first class (PFC)/E-3.

3.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was awarded the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Ribbon, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).  Item 13 does not show award of the Army Achievement Medal.

4.  There are no orders in the applicant's records that show she was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

5.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show she was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

6.  In a self-authored statement, dated 23 June 2008, the applicant states that she was promised an award of the Army Achievement Medal during her assignment to the 103rd Military Intelligence Battalion in Germany for painting artistic murals inside the dining facility and creating visual posters that were laminated and decorated in the field to boast up morale.  She also states that she used her own material, time off, money, and was promised this award by two staff sergeants in her unit.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the armed forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.

8.  Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows she was recommended for and/or awarded the Army Achievement Medal.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required for award of the Army Achievement Medal.

2.  Nevertheless, while the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the Army Achievement Medal, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue her claim for the Army Achievement Medal by submitting a request through her Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011452





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011452



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000757

    Original file (20130000757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * two awards of the Army Achievement Medal * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon 2. The applicant states: * her DD Form 214 listed only one award of the Army Achievement Medal; she was awarded two awards * she was awarded the first award while assigned to the 70th Engineer Company from May 1986 to December 1988 and her second award for service in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005647

    Original file (20080005647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and the "Connelly Award." There is no evidence the applicant received the "Connelly Award." ___ XXX ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017139

    Original file (20100017139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows she served in Kuwait/Iraq from 10 January 2003 to 14 July 2003 as evidenced by the entry on her evaluation report and the statement provided by her former CSM. Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show her foreign service and the dates of service in Kuwait/Iraq.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021709

    Original file (20130021709.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Enlisted Record Brief * Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Standard Form 600, dated 9 May 1995, that shows her Saudi Arabia dates of service as October 1990 and March 1991. Her DD Form 214 listed awards that are specific to Southwest Asia and she also provided an award recommendation as well as a medical document that confirm her service in Southwest Asia in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017410

    Original file (20080017410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows his awards as the Army Commendation Medal (three awards), Army Achievement Medal (two awards), National Defense Service Medal, Presidential Unit Citation (two awards), Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Iraq Campaign Medal [with bronze service star], Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon (two awards), Combat Action Badge, and the Driver and Mechanic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010095

    Original file (20140010095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a new issue, he requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Records and Report of Separation-Honorable Service) to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. However, in the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence confirming appointment or promotion to a higher grade there is insufficient evidence to correct item 3 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show the rank he held on 11 March 1946 was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019876

    Original file (20080019876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 07 MAY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080019876 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that her DD Form 214 does not show the exact dates of her combat service and that she would not qualify for benefits (grants) without showing her combat service on her DD Form 214. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows she was recommended for and/or awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011931

    Original file (20090011931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The FSM’s military records are not available for review. The FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active service on 15 October 1941.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005350

    Original file (20080005350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. She was given 15 Soldiers under her command. A DA Form 2823, dated 13 September 2007, shows the applicant's 1SG stated that on 12 September 2007, while counseling the applicant, she became disrespectful in her mannerisms.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004883

    Original file (20080004883.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show award of the Army Achievement Medal and the issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate. There are no orders in the applicant’s personnel records to show that she was awarded the Army Achievement Medal. In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Army Achievement Medal.