Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002121
Original file (20080002121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  29 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080002121 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.










      The following members, a quorum, were present:













	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  The applicant provides several copies of photographs he alleges to be of himself in support of his request. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070008222, on 29 November 2007.

2.  In the previous case, the applicant’s contention that he was entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge was carefully considered and determined to be without merit.  There was no evidence in the available records and the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to show that he was directly involved in active ground combat or that he was performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.

3.  The applicant provided, as new evidence, copies of several photographs he alleges to be of himself, which were taken in Vietnam, in June 1971.  He states that he was performing duties as a barber, as he had done in many occasions in all surrounded areas, and fought as long as he needed to.  He states that he was a barber going into the jungle from Camp Campbell to Khe Sahn jumping in and out of choppers at times receiving and returning fire.  He also served as a gunner on several occasions transporting replacement troops to their new units at times under enemy fire, and they were attacked on many occasions by mortar and fire fights defending their perimeters.

4.  The applicant describes, in one of his photographs, a tower that he stated he fell from when his knee gave out in Camp Campbell on 4 June 1971 (sic).  He came back from Khe Sahn on 3 June [1971].  He described the incident that occurred on 2 and 3 June 1971.  One of the pictures shows he was on his way to provide his services as a "combat barber" and a picture of the barbershop, with him standing in front with two other barbers.
5.  Section 38 (Record of Assignments), of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows the applicant was assigned as an instructor to the 101st Administration Company, 101st Airborne Division, in the Republic of 
Vietnam during the period 5 November 1970 through 1 July 1971.  There is no record of the applicant having been assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment or smaller size, nor is there evidence he participated in ground combat.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  The Awards Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command [now the Human Resources Command] has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's new argument was carefully considered and found to be without merit.

2.  Documentation presented as new evidence, such as the photographs he alleges to be of himself, which were taken in Vietnam in June 1971, indicated he was performing duties as a barber, as he had done on many occasions in all surrounding areas.  He stated that he was a combat barber going into the jungle in Vietnam; jumping in and out of choppers, at times receiving and returning fire; and he served as a gunner on several occasions.

3.  As indicated in the previous consideration, the applicant was assigned to a unit that was not infantry and his duty title was that of instructor.  He has provided no new evidence to show that he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size and participated in active ground combat.

4.  Once again, he has provided insufficient evidence to show that he was directly involved in active ground combat, while serving in Vietnam, or that he was performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. 





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ___x___  ___x_            DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20070008222, dated 29 November 2007.




      ______x______________
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002121



4


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005358

    Original file (20120005358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel, Constituent Services, Office of Congressman C____ C____ of Minnesota, states: * the applicant was awarded the CIB while assigned to a cavalry unit serving in the Republic of Vietnam * there was no discussion or conclusion related to a photograph he submitted showing the CIB on his fatigue uniform * a reasonable conclusion would be that a young Soldier serving in Vietnam for more than a year while assigned to a cavalry unit as a light weapons infantryman would be engaged in combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003274

    Original file (20140003274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It did not seem important to him at the time so he never requested the CIB. In addition to his regular duties working on helicopter turbine engines, he was required to do green line and flight line guard duty. c. During his time at An Khe, his unit received sniper and mortar attacks.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003679

    Original file (20120003679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003494

    Original file (20150003494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003494 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provided a statement, dated 4 November 2014, from Mr. C. Mr. C provided a newspaper article that reported he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 8 April 1967 and he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor of the 25th Infantry Division. This met the requirement of being assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller unit for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003081300C070212

    Original file (2003081300C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his previous application to correct his records by awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, that would indicate that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge or that he was recommended for this award during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073449C070403

    Original file (2002073449C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in item 38 (Record of Assignments) that his principal duty during his assignment in Vietnam was in MOS 91B, ambulance driver, as a member of the 51st Medical Company. The Board considered the applicant’s request for award of the Combat Medical Badge and reviewed his service personnel records and all of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023844

    Original file (20110023844.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This pamphlet shows the 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for service for the period 3 October 1968 through 2 May 1970 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1971. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Republic of Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003149

    Original file (20140003149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following: * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, and Bronze Star Medal * a personal appearance before the Board 2. He stated the documentation he was submitting showed he served in Vietnam and was wounded. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence showing he personally participated in active ground combat while assigned/attached to this infantry unit during his period of service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019640

    Original file (20090019640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Combat Medical Badge. There are no orders for the Combat Medical Badge in the available records. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Medical Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007239

    Original file (20080007239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Combat Medical Badge. However, USARV Regulation 672-1 did provide detailed guidance on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge which is awarded to infantry personnel based essentially the same criteria for award of the Combat Medical Badge to medical aid personnel assigned to infantry units. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded a medical MOS following...