Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003274
Original file (20140003274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  18 September 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140003274 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  Upon arriving at An Khe, Vietnam with the 1st Cavalry Division, he was put on green line duty for 3 weeks.  At that time, he was told that after 2 weeks he would be eligible for the CIB.  It did not seem important to him at the time so he never requested the CIB.

	b.  In addition to his regular duties working on helicopter turbine engines, he was required to do green line and flight line guard duty.  

	c.  During his time at An Khe, his unit received sniper and mortar attacks.  Additionally, during helicopter maintenance he would fly in the helicopters to check them for vibrations in the turbines and several times he received ground fire, which caused structural damage to the helicopters.  

	d.  He also volunteered for several search and destroy missions in hills and valleys around An Khe.

	e.  He is proud to have served his country, but for 45 years he never joined any veterans' functions.  A couple of years ago he became friends with someone who also served in the cavalry and he started attending veterans' parades and other functions.  He is very proud to wear his uniform and he would like to have the CIB.
3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a copy of a newspaper article, and several photographs depicting elements of his service in Vietnam.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  His records were requested from the repository in St. Louis, MO, but without success.  This case is being considered based of the evidence he provided.  

3.  His DD Form 214 shows:

	a.  He was inducted into the Army of the United Sates on 5 April 1966 and he served in military occupational specialty 68B (Aircraft Engineer Mechanic).

	b.  He served 1 year of foreign service in the U.S. Army Pacific theater of operations.

	c.  The CIB is not included as an authorized award.

	d.  He was honorably released from active duty on 29 January 1968.

4.  He provided a copy of a newspaper article that describes enemy mortar attacks sustained by the 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), and several photographs described by the applicant as photographs taken during search and destroy missions and green line duty.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  To be entitled to award of the CIB, the evidence must show that an individual held and served in an infantry MOS, while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to such an infantry unit.

2.  His contention that he engaged in active ground combat and that his unit encountered several small arms and mortar attacks is not in doubt; however, he did not hold an infantry MOS.  Therefore, he is not authorized the CIB.  

3.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003274



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140003274



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018485

    Original file (20100018485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. The letter he provided from his company commander is considered to be an official document of record; however, it refers to the unit engaging in ground combat after the applicant's departure from the unit. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000859

    Original file (20100000859.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following documents: * listing of 9th Infantry Division Soldiers killed in action (KIA) by unit * listing of the 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry, Honor Roll * internet printout of the 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry, operations in Vietnam * by-name listing of Company A, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry's KIA Soldiers and their listing on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial * several photographs of Soldiers of the 1st Platoon, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015458

    Original file (20140015458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he was relieved from duty, on 16 February 1968, while at Firebase Bravo, Camp Enari, Pleiku, Vietnam * he was flown to Cam Rahn Bay Air Base for his flight back to the United States, on 17 February 1968 * he was flown to Fort Lewis, WA, to begin his out-processing * he was issued a new dress uniform, complete with ribbons, patches, and Blackhawk insignias already on his uniform * his original DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003494

    Original file (20150003494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003494 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provided a statement, dated 4 November 2014, from Mr. C. Mr. C provided a newspaper article that reported he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 8 April 1967 and he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor of the 25th Infantry Division. This met the requirement of being assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller unit for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002121

    Original file (20080002121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There was no evidence in the available records and the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to show that he was directly involved in active ground combat or that he was performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. The applicant provided, as new evidence, copies of several...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013045

    Original file (20080013045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a self-authored statement, two notarized statements from two squad leaders, miscellaneous photographs of various Soldiers, copies of his unit’s morning reports, Internet printouts, and radio local news and newspaper articles, which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Therefore, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018662

    Original file (20140018662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states, in effect, that the Board should not have denied his previous request on the basis that his unit did not have the word "infantry" in its title or that he failed to provide evidence that he was in direct combat with the enemy while in Vietnam. f. The 765th Security Platoon was the only such unit in Vietnam. He has not provided evidence showing that this Soldier was awarded the CIB for his service with the platoon.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015055

    Original file (20090015055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He questions how is it possible for him or other members of the 765th Security Platoon to provide evidence of participation in active ground combat when the "National Achieves and Records, or the National Personnel Records Center" were unable to find any records of personnel or activities of the 765th Security Platoon. The record shows that the applicant was assigned to the 765th Security Platoon, not a named infantry unit. The evidence of record shows the applicant was not assigned to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017420

    Original file (20100017420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014956

    Original file (20080014956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also states that he was not awarded a PH medal for wounds he received in Lai Khe, South Vietnam. There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records which show he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS as a security guard with the USMACV during his tour in Vietnam.