Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005358
Original file (20120005358.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  27 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120005358 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

The applicant defers to counsel.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  Counsel, Constituent Services, Office of Congressman C____ C____ of Minnesota, states:

* the applicant was awarded the CIB while assigned to a cavalry unit serving in the Republic of Vietnam
* there was no discussion or conclusion related to a photograph he submitted showing the CIB on his fatigue uniform
* a reasonable conclusion would be that a young Soldier serving in Vietnam for more than a year while assigned to a cavalry unit as a light weapons infantryman would be engaged in combat operations at some point
* it is possible for a Soldier to be awarded a CIB and have the expected documentation fail to make it into the Soldier's records, especially from a war zone

3.  Counsel provides:

* statement from the applicant, dated 17 February 2012
* photograph (two copies, one with typewritten notations)
* applicant's DD Form 214
* Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings, Docket Number AR20110002648, dated 2 August 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20110002648 on 2 August 2011.

2.  Counsel submits a statement from the applicant and argues that the photograph showing the applicant wearing the CIB sewn on his uniform was not previously considered by the Board as it is not mentioned in the discussion or conclusion sections of the Record of Proceedings.  The applicant's statement and counsel's argument are considered new and as such warrant consideration by the Board.

3.  On 28 May 1970, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist four/E-4.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

* item 38 (Record of Assignments) assignment to Troop D, 7th Squadron, 17th Cavalry, U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)-RVN, from 6 November 1970 through on or about 1 December 1971

5.  His record is void of any documentation showing he was awarded the CIB.

6.  Counsel provides two copies of a photograph of two Soldiers.  The second copy indicates the applicant is wearing the CIB on his jungle fatigues.  The Soldiers’ names on their uniforms are not legible.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size at such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat.  Qualified Soldiers must have been personally present and participated in the combat operations.

8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam.  This regulation stated that criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and that the Combat Infantryman Badge was the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service.  Further, "the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day-to-day combat."  This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers, to enlisted personnel, and to warrant officers who had an infantry specialty/military occupational specialty and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Counsel's request for reconsideration of the applicant's request for award of the CIB was carefully considered.

2.  Despite the new evidence and argument submitted, the basic issue reverts to the absence of orders awarding the applicant the CIB and substantiating evidence that confirms he served in active ground combat.  In accordance with U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1, "the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day-to-day combat."  Without orders showing he was awarded the CIB or documentary evidence showing conclusively that he served in active ground combat while performing infantry duties, there is an insufficient basis for correcting his record to show he was awarded the CIB.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110002648, dated 2 August 2011.
2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005358



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005358



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017262

    Original file (20100017262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His infantry MOS and assignment to an infantry unit are not in question; however, there is no evidence in the available records, and the submitted evidence is insufficient, to show his participation in active ground combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017195

    Original file (20120017195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he served in Vietnam (1968) for 4 months and 19 days in combat and was never awarded the CIB. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. However, there is no evidence in his military personnel records and he did not submit sufficient evidence that shows he was personally present while serving in his assigned infantry duty in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017351

    Original file (20080017351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 21 August 1971 to 21 April 1972. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013045

    Original file (20080013045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submitted a self-authored statement, two notarized statements from two squad leaders, miscellaneous photographs of various Soldiers, copies of his unit’s morning reports, Internet printouts, and radio local news and newspaper articles, which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Therefore, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023880

    Original file (20100023880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Air Medal (AM) (6th Award) and with "V" Device. The available evidence of record fails to show the applicant was awarded the CIB. Although the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the AM (5th OLC), there is no evidence of record and he has provided none to show he was awarded the AM (6th Award) and with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014005

    Original file (20090014005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. During the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010806

    Original file (20120010806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 1 August 1969, to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Letter of Commendation that he provided. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. It is not a basis for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009921

    Original file (20100009921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record the applicant served in active ground combat during his tour in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and as a result concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, there is no indication he was ever assigned to an infantry staff headquarters or to non-infantry duties during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, and given his unit regularly participated in combat operations and was cited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008114

    Original file (20080008114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) he was assigned to a unit as an infantryman and performed the duties of an infantryman. There are no orders in his official record showing he was awarded the CIB. The evidence in the official record shows the applicant held MOS 94B and performed duties as a cook while in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012622

    Original file (20110012622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he should be considered for the CIB: * for serving in Vietnam during the period 15 October 1970 through 11 February 1971 * it was never awarded nor recorded on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) 3. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as operation reports, after action reports, valor awards, witness statements, or any other evidence that conclusively shows he actively participated in ground...