Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003494
Original file (20150003494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 October 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150003494 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states he has been in contact with several former platoon comrades.  He and Mr. C had been communicating for a number of years.  Mr. C sent him documentation, including his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), along with some pertinent information relative to his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  Mr. C's tour in the Republic of Vietnam was from November 1966 to November 1967.  The applicant's tour was from July 1967 to July 1968.  Mr. C as well as the other men serving with the 4.2 mortar platoon, Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 1st Battalion, 69th Armor were all awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.  

3.  He states that prior to and after his injury in a "friendly fire" incident, his entire tour was spent in the field.  Their platoon was always supporting the line tank companies with either indirect mortar fire or illumination rounds at night.  They also worked with other infantry units in the 4th Infantry Division and participated in engagements with the North Vietnamese Army (NVA).  They also were attached to the 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry (Airborne), 173rd Airborne Brigade with bridge security and sweeps along the An Khe Pass.  He believes he has met the requirement of "an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties."


4.  The applicant provides:

* a statement, dated 4 November 2014, from Mr. C
* Mr. C's DD Form 214
* a newspaper article, date unknown, reporting Mr. C had received the Combat Infantryman Badge
* a photograph of "Track 38"
* a photograph of Mr. C
* Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20140001135, dated 11 September 2014

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20140001135, on 11 September 2014.

2.  The evidence he provided is new and merits consideration by the Board.

3.  On 3 October 1966, he was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).

4.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 29 July 1967 to on or about 
26 December 1967 and from 15 February - 24 July 1968.  He was assigned as a patient to the Medical Holding Company, 7th Field Hospital, Japan from 
27 December 1967 - 30 January 1968.  While in the Republic of Vietnam he was assigned to:

* HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor, 25th Infantry Division - 30 August - 
26 December 1967
* HHC, 2nd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division 15 - 26 February 1968
* HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor - 26 February - 24 July 1968

5.  On 24 July 1968, he was released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

7.  The applicant provided a statement, dated 4 November 2014, from Mr. C.  
Mr. C provided a newspaper article that reported he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 8 April 1967 and he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor of the 25th Infantry Division.  He also provided his DD Form 214 showing he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and a photograph showing him wearing the Combat Infantryman Badge on his uniform.

8.  Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual and unit military awards.  

	a.  The Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  

	b.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  With the exception of the period 15 - 26 February 1968, the applicant was assigned to an armor unit while in the Republic of Vietnam.  He did not meet the criteria for the Combat Infantryman Badge while assigned to an armor unit.

2.  He was assigned to the HHC, 2nd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division from 
15 - 26 February 1968.  This met the requirement of being assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller unit for the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  However, there is no substantive evidence that he was personally present and under hostile fire while assigned to this unit.

3.  Mr. C stated that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge for action on 8 April 1967 while he was assigned to HHC, 1st Battalion, 69th Armor of the 25th Infantry Division.  The specifics of his being awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge are not available for review.  It is noted that Mr. C was awarded his Combat Infantryman Badge 5 months before the applicant arrived in the Republic of Vietnam.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20140001135, dated 11 September 2014.




      _______ _   ___X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003494





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150003494



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006133C070205

    Original file (20060006133C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show two awards of the Purple Heart, in effect, the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001135

    Original file (20140001135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is insufficient evidence in the available records and he did not submit substantiating evidence that shows he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. In the absence of additional documentary evidence that specifically places him under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088416C070403

    Original file (2003088416C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to DA Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned during his tour of duty in Vietnam, HHC, 3rd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 1 September 1968 through 30 September 1970, by Department of the Army General Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021587

    Original file (20100021587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090021315, on 8 June 2010. His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016520

    Original file (20090016520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Combat Infantryman Badge was omitted from his records as he served continuously for 12 months as a cavalry platoon leader supervising and engaging with infantry units in combat. The applicant's records also show the following: a. This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military occupational specialty and required that they must have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021315

    Original file (20090021315.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The newspaper article provided by the applicant states he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 8 April 1966 while assigned to the 69th Armor Regiment. The available evidence clearly shows that he was awarded an infantryman MOS, but was assigned to the headquarters company of an armor battalion while in the Republic of Vietnam. The newspaper article and photograph provided by the applicant are not sufficient evidence by themselves upon which to base a correction of his records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018799

    Original file (20110018799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Expert Infantryman Badge * Combat Infantryman Badge (3rd Award) 2. Additionally, there is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he had satisfactorily held an infantry or special forces MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019142

    Original file (20130019142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. However, the Combat Infantryman Badge is not recorded in his military records. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014114

    Original file (20080014114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073851C070403

    Original file (2002073851C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thomas B___ states that he and the applicant were both members of the Reconnaissance Platoon of the 1st Battalion, 327th Infantry (Airborne), 1st Brigade, 101st Airborne Division in Vietnam. Absent his service medical records, there is insufficient evidence to show the fragmentation wounds that occurred in 1966 were the result of hostile action. NOTE : The Board requests the Army Review Board Agency's Support Division amend the applicant's DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Meritorious...