Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012887C070206
Original file (20050012887C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         1 June 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050012887


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Thomas M. Ray                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. David K. Hassenritter         |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military retirement
transportation entitlements be extended.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he retired on 1 January 1994 in Korea,
where he was command sponsored.  He states that he obtained civilian
employment and remained in Korea.  He claims that at the time, employment
after retirement was foremost in his mind, and he did not consider
returning to the United States with his daughter.  He states that he was a
single parent at the time, and after successfully fulfilling his obligation
with several defense contractors in Korea, he was selected for and accepted
a civil service GS-11 position, which he started on 28 June 1999.  He
states that he was never afforded the opportunity to transfer his
retirement transportation entitlements to his civil service position.

3.  The applicant further indicates that since his retirement, he has
remarried and his eldest daughter, who originally accompanied him to Korea
has returned to the United States at his expense.  He states that he is now
in a position where he and his family would like to return to the United
States as civil service employee; however, unfortunately many of the GS-
13/14 positions that are announced stateside do not offer permanent change
of station (PCS) costs.  He claims it would be financially impossible for
him to ship his automobile and household goods at his own expense, and
selling everything would not be very practical, and an exception to the
extension rules would be the right thing to do.

4.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his
application:  Separation Document (DD Form 214); Separation Orders;
Notification of Personnel Action (SF 50-B); and Electronic Mail (e-mail)
Messages.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred 31 December 1993.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
2 September 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3.  The applicant's record contains 199th Personnel Service Company Orders
217-182, dated 22 November 1993.  These orders authorized the applicant's
retirement on 1 January 1994, in Korea.  They also authorized him and his
command sponsored dependents, household goods, accompanied and
unaccompanied baggage and privately owned vehicle were authorized
government funded travel from his overseas duty station to point of
debarkation in the United States, and from the debarkation point to a home
of selection, home of record, or place entered active duty.  Storage of
household goods at the debarkation point was authorized for up to one year.


4.  The applicant's separation orders also indicated that the applicant
pre-selected a retirement location, and was advised that this selection
constituted the place he intended to reside immediately after military
service for the purpose of transportation and travel allowances.  No fully
funded move to another home of settlement after retirement would be
authorized.

5.  On 31 December 1993, the applicant was released from active duty
(REFRAD) for the purpose of retirement after completing 21 years, 4 months,
and 17 days of active military service.  At the time, he held the rank of
sergeant first class (SFC).

6.  The applicant provides e-mail messages that show he attempted to obtain
travel and transportation allowances through the civilian personnel system,
which he was denied based on his civil service employment status in Korea.


7.  The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR)  contains the policy on per
diem, travel and transportation allowances, relocation allowances, and
certain other allowances of Uniform Service members.  Paragraph U5012
contains guidance on PCS allowances.  Subparagraph I provides guidance on
extensions of travel and transportation allowances when a member separates
from service.  It states, in pertinent part, that extensions will not be
authorized or approved if it extends travel and transportation allowances
for more than 6 years from the date of separation, release from active
duty, or retirement unless a certified ongoing medical condition prevents
relocation of the member for longer than 6 years from the
separation/retirement date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that his military travel and transportation
allowances be extended and the supporting documents he submitted were
carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support
granting the requested relief.

2.  By regulation, extensions of travel and transportation allowances are
not authorized for more than 6 years from the date of retirement.  In this
case, the evidence of record confirms the applicant made the personal
choice to select Korea as his retirement location in order to obtain
civilian employment, and he has remained there for more than 12 years since
his retirement in January 1994.

3.  The applicant was, or should have been aware of the 6 year limitation
on the extension of his military travel and transportation allowances at
the time of his retirement.  The fact that he is now contemplating a move
back to the United States based on his civilian employment opportunities
does not provide a basis to grant an exception the extension provisions of
the JFTR.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 1 January 2000, the date his 6 year
period for extension of military transportation and travel allowances
expired.  Therefore, the time for him to file a request for correction of
any error or injustice expired on 31 December 2003.  He did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

___WDP_  __TMR  _  __DKH__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board
determined during their review that the evidence presented was sufficient
to warrant a recommendation for relief, as an exception to policy, and to
excuse failure to timely file.  The applicant, a Soldier at the time, was
ordered to move to Korea at government expense.  He subsequently retired
from active Army service and continued to work for the U.S. Government in
Korea as a contractor, followed by service as a civil service employee.
Therefore, the retired Soldier should be able to return to the United
States at government expense.

2.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that his
entitlement to movement of dependents, accompanied and unaccompanied
baggage, and privately owned vehicle from debarkation point to a home of
selection, home of record, or place entered on active duty at government
expense was extended for a period not to exceed one year from the date of
implementation of this proceeding.




                                  ____William D. Powers___
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050012887                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |2006/06/01                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1994/01/01                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Retirement                              |
|BOARD DECISION          |Grant                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Scheider                            |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004327

    Original file (20090004327.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. A chronological listing, titled: Notes to Support Extension of Transportation Request, showing the applicant's efforts in requesting an extension of his travel and transportation entitlements post-retirement. On 13 October 2008, the applicant requested that his retirement home of selection travel and transportation entitlements be reinstated. Paragraph U5012-I of the JFTR states that a written time limit extension that includes an explanation of the circumstances justifying the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011614C071029

    Original file (20060011614C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Roland S. Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was told by the Yongsan, Korea transportation office that the shipment [papers] showed delivery, but he would have to contact the Colorado transportation office for an exact delivery date. He stated he was told in Korea that a delivery date had to be entered on the DD Form 1299.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022410

    Original file (20100022410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, he never requested an extension of the entitlement because he did not know he still had it based on his retirement. His date of retirement was 30 June 2005. b. He was informed on his orders that he had only 1 year in which to use his transportation entitlement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017758

    Original file (20140017758.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Following the NTS expiration, the HHG must be transported as soon as possible to the final destination c. U5464-A (Privately Owned vehicle (POV) Transportation Time Limitations): Transportation of a POV for an eligible member must be initiated within 180 days following separation from the Service or relief from active duty. It would be appropriate to show the applicant's request for extension and reinstatement of his HHG, POV, and family shipment/travel entitlements through 14 January 2015...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010824

    Original file (20100010824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted an extension of his travel and transportation entitlements. The applicant was provided a copy of this advisory opinion and given the opportunity to respond. The applicant states that he did not request an extension of his travel and transportation entitlements because of the operational tempo of his civilian job.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007955

    Original file (20080007955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 29 March 2004 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for completion of required active service. Subparagraph G continues by stating that the time limit extension for transportation in no way extends the Government's obligation for storage costs for longer than the period authorized/approved under paragraph U5360-B (i.e., at the expiration of the 180th day). The applicant was discharged from active duty on 29 March 2004 upon the completion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009311

    Original file (20110009311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. she calculates the NTS fee based on the quote from a Fort McPherson, GA transportation agent which was $43.18 per month (from December 2009 to March 2011 is 15 months (15 x $43.18 = $647.70)). She was expecting to move her HHG this year (2011) using her NTS entitlements. However, the advisory opinion points out that on 17 October 2005, the Fort McPherson Transportation Office informed the applicant via email that she was responsible for all costs involved with storage beyond 1 year past...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017718

    Original file (20080017718.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he requested an extension of entitlement to ship his household goods. It appears the applicant submitted a request for an extension of his travel and shipping entitlement in September 2008, 2 years subsequent to his retirement date. Although the applicant failed to timely file a request for extension of his travel and transportation entitlements, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to correct his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009184

    Original file (20110009184.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably retired on 1 April 2009. Notwithstanding the Department of the Army G-4's email message that extension is not authorized, it seems appropriate to show the applicant's request for extension and reinstatement of his HHG shipment entitlements was approved through 31 March 2012 (3 years after his retirement). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802672

    Original file (9802672.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears that in each instance that the applicant requested an extension for non-temporary storage (NTS) of his household goods (HHG), he was informed that the request for extension was approved; however, he was not advised there would be a cost to him commencing one year after termination of active duty. However, JPPSO/DIR states that they would support storage entitlement to 6 October 1997, the time he was informed of the debt and the applicant would be responsible for storage costs in...