Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002484C070206
Original file (20050002484C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        19 OCTOBER 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050002484


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Barbara Ellis                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Hubert Fry                    |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert Rogers                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the dates
and times he was exposed to radiation, Agent Orange, and mustard gas.  He
also requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states there is no record of the exposure times and dates
recorded in either his medical or military personnel records.  He implies
the information should have been noted in his records because he performed
duties as a chemical NCO (noncommissioned officer) between September 1961
and December 1983.  He states his exposures occurred at Fort McClellan,
Alabama while attending training in 1961, 1962 and 1966, at Yucker Flats
Nevada Test while assigned to the 50th Chemical Platoon at Fort Ord,
California, and in Vietnam between 1969 and 1970.

3.  The applicant provides no evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Records available to the Board indicate the applicant entered active
duty on 15 September 1961 and served continuously through a series of
reenlistment actions until 8 December 1983 when he was retired by reason of
physical disability.  He was trained in the chemical field and performed
duties in that field for the majority of his more than 22 years of active
Federal service.

2.  The applicant served one tour of duty in Vietnam between March 1969 and
March 1970 and several tours of duty in Germany.

3.  There were no service medical records available to the Board, no
evidence the applicant was ever wounded as a result of hostile action, and
his name is not among a list of individuals reported as combat casualties
during the Vietnam War.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a
medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.



5.  U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards)
provided, in pertinent part, for award of the Purple Heart.  The regulation
stated that authority to award the Purple Heart was delegated to hospital
commanders.  Further, it directed that all personnel treated and released
within 24 hours would be awarded the Purple Heart by the organization to
which the individual was assigned.  Personnel requiring hospitalization in
excess of 24 hours or evacuation from Vietnam would be awarded the Purple
Heart directly by the hospital commander rendering treatment.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 precludes award of the Purple Heart for
injuries or wounds resulting from chemical, biological, or nuclear agents
not released by the enemy.

7.  Army Regulation 40-66 establishes the policies and procedures for
medical records' administration and documentation of health care.  It notes
that entries will be made in an individual service medical record by the
health care provider who observes, treats, or cares for the patient.  It
also establishes the information required to be recorded when an individual
seeks medical treatment from a treatment facility for an injury.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 establishes the policies and mandates the
operating tasks for military personnel information management and records.
It notes that information about Soldiers is accumulated at various
locations and that essential personnel information is recorded in a record
for use by personnel managers, commanders, and the individual Soldier.  The
military personnel system is a function which provides a record of critical
personnel information about Soldiers to support battlefield decisions and
to satisfy the nation's obligation to retain historical information for its
veterans.  Only documents listed in the regulation will accompany or be
filed in an individual's military personnel record.  The regulation does
not provided for entries documenting each time an individual is exposed to
a chemical, biological, or nuclear agent.

9.  Army Regulation 50-6 establishes Army policies, assigns responsibility,
and prescribes procedures for the Army Chemical Surety Program.  The
purpose of the program is to ensure that chemical agent operations are
conducted in a safe, secure, and reliable manner.  That regulation, and
regulations in the 385 series, which outline various Army safety programs
and procedures, do not provide for, or require documentation of a Soldier's
exposure to chemical agents in the course of their daily routine military
duties.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no medical evidence, and the applicant has not provided any,
which confirms that he was wounded as a result of hostile action.  In the
absence of such medical evidence, there is no basis for an award of the
Purple Heart.  The fact that the applicant may have routinely been exposed
to chemicals as part of his military duties does not meet eligibility
criteria for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  While the applicant would have been exposed to chemicals during the
course of his military career as part of his duties in the chemical field,
there are no provisions where by such routine exposures would have been
recorded in his military personnel records.

3.  Documentation in his service medical records would only have occurred
in those instances when the individual would have sought medical treatment
for an injury or condition related to his exposure to chemicals.  Routine
exposures as part of his daily duties, which did not result in medical
treatment would not have been recorded.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__BE ___  __HF ___  __RR  ___  DENY APPLICATION










BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





                                  ______Barbara Ellis_________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050002484                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051019                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.00                                  |
|2.                      |110.00                                  |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078031C070215

    Original file (2002078031C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021312

    Original file (20140021312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention, exposure to Agent Orange cannot be the basis for award of the Purple Heart. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079856C070215

    Original file (2002079856C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the available records that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Southwest Asia. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was injured by enemy released chemical, biological, or a nuclear agent in Southwest Asia.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010087

    Original file (20100010087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical records are available for review with this case but none of the medical documents show he was wounded in action or treated for a combat wound. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012127

    Original file (20130012127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101591C070208

    Original file (04101591C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald Weaver | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 7 October 1998 this Board granted his request for award of the Purple Heart for a wound from a fragmentation grenade that he received in Vietnam in 1969. The evidence shows that the applicant has medical conditions caused by his exposure to chemical agents during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012022

    Original file (20110012022 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart and his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009185C070206

    Original file (20050009185C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his exposure to chemical and biological agents while deployed during the Gulf War caused Bowens Disease and has made him completely and permanently disabled. He was born on 3 October 1944 and after serving 10 years, 2 months and 28 days of active service in the Air Force, he was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-5 on 12 May 1977 with a total of 11 years, 3 months and 16 days of service for pay purposes. While the applicant has provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006052

    Original file (20110006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant states he was exposed to Iraqi chemical nerve agents on multiple occasions during combat operations in Operation Desert Storm. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001715

    Original file (20140001715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was injured on 24 July 2009; he was present and physically located within 15 meters of the impact zone of several enemy mortar rounds * he was involved in an enemy indirect mortar attack that set ablaze a lithium battery warehouse * the incident caused him internal injuries and concussion injuries as a result of an enemy-generated explosion * HRC stated he did not meet the criteria for award of the Purple Heart because he was responding to an enemy attack rather...