Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012127
Original file (20130012127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

		BOARD DATE:	  19 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130012127 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he should be awarded the Purple Heart based on his exposure to Agent Orange causing his chloracne 5 1/2 years ago.    

3.  The applicant provides 10 photographs.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 6 October 1969, he enlisted in the Regular Army.  He immediately reenlisted on 30 September 1970 and on 4 May 1971.  His DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with effective dates of 29 September 1970 and 3 May 1971 do not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 2 September 1970 to 1 September 1971.  He was assigned to the:

* 378th Main Support Company from 12 - 15 September 1970
* 185th Maintenance Battalion from 16 September - 15 December 1970
* 510th Engineer Company from 16 December 1970 - 8 February 1971
* 378th Maintenance Support Company from 9 February - 29 August 1971

4.  On 3 May 1976, he was discharged by reason of his completion of required service.  His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 3 May 1976 does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

5.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

6.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

	a.  Chemical, biological, or nuclear agents not released by enemy agents are examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart.

	b.  The regulation also provides for award of the Purple Heart to individuals wounded or killed as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  

2.  The governing regulation clearly states that chemical, biological, or nuclear agents not released by enemy agents are examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not qualify for award of the Purple Heart.  Agent Orange was employed by U.S. Forces in Vietnam as a chemical defoliant and not by the enemy.  Its use cannot be construed as a hostile action on the part of the enemy.  In addition, Agent Orange was not used as a weapon against enemy forces.  Therefore, there would be no basis to show exposure as "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle." Therefore, exposure to Agent Orange cannot be the basis for award of the Purple Heart.  

3.  In view of the above, regrettably, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  _X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012127



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130012127



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021312

    Original file (20140021312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention, exposure to Agent Orange cannot be the basis for award of the Purple Heart. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007357

    Original file (20100007357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests that correction be made to his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 1978. The applicant requests his DA Form 199 be corrected to show his disability resulted from an instrumentality of war. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Purple Heart and Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal or correction of his DA Form 199.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012022

    Original file (20110012022 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart and his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006402

    Original file (20110006402.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was shot during combat in Vietnam but he was not awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019618

    Original file (20080019618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: Self-Authored Statement; Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Letter, dated 25 August 2008; Certificate of Death; Certificate of Marriage; United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Letter, dated 31 January 2008; Certificates of Release or Discharge From Active Duty (DD Forms 214); Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decisions, dated 25 May 2006 and 17 December 2007; Bronze Star Medal (BSM) Citation;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021401

    Original file (20130021401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her father be awarded the Purple Heart because he developed diabetes and other conditions related to exposure to Agent Orange. The available evidence indicates that the FSM, over time, developed conditions that may be linked to Agent Orange but there is no evidence that he sustained and was treated for a combat wound. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101591C070208

    Original file (04101591C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald Weaver | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 7 October 1998 this Board granted his request for award of the Purple Heart for a wound from a fragmentation grenade that he received in Vietnam in 1969. The evidence shows that the applicant has medical conditions caused by his exposure to chemical agents during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010817

    Original file (20100010817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not document any combat wounds, and there is no other evidence in his service records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016783

    Original file (20100016783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in action, and his service record is void of orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant's records that show the hospital commander awarded him the Purple Heart. With respect to the applicant's argument that other Soldiers received the Purple Heart as a result of friendly accidents, the ABCMR decides cases on the evidence of record and each case is considered on its own merits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010650

    Original file (20120010650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM was never awarded the Purple Heart for the injury he incurred in Vietnam. The applicant provides: * An undated handwritten account of the FSM's assignment to Vietnam * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Certification of Service, dated 19 October 1971 * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending on 24 September 1974 * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) application for medical benefits, dated 30 April 1991 * Death Certificate, dated 19 December 2010 *...