Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member | |
Mr. Bernard P. Ingold | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Award of the Purple Heart.
APPLICANT STATES: That he received injuries on 24 February 1991 in Southwest Asia from a sarin nerve agent during a scud attack. He contends that he has suffered from these injuries since February 1991, those illnesses are now called Gulf War Syndrome. He is requesting the Purple Heart based on an injury caused by a sarin nerve agent, not the Gulf War Syndrome. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a Nurses Progress Record, dated 7 March 1991; a radiology report, dated 7 March 1991; a Department of the Veterans Affairs (DVA) Compensation and Pension Exam Report, dated 26 June 2002; a DVA letter, dated 15 August 2002; and a letter, dated 10 October 2001, from the Military Awards Branch at U.S. Total Army Personnel Command.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 30 April 2002, the applicant retired in the rank of master sergeant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12, for sufficient service for retirement.
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he served in Southwest Asia from
6 December 1990 through 1 May 1991.
The applicant's DD Form 214, which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
There is no evidence in the available records that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Southwest Asia.
There is no evidence in the available records that the applicant was injured by enemy released chemical, biological, or a nuclear agent in Southwest Asia.
In support of his claim for award of the Purple Heart, the applicant submitted a Nurses Progress Record, dated 7 March 1991. This record shows that the applicant was admitted and treated for complaints of headache, dizziness, insomnia, fatigue and weakness in Southwest Asia. There is no evidence that these illnesses were the result of hostile action or enemy released chemical, biological, or a nuclear agent in Southwest Asia.
The applicant also provided a DVA Compensation and Pension Exam Report, dated 26 June 2002. This report states, in pertinent part, "the patient claimed that he was exposed to sarin nerve agent" and "The problem like this could be reasonably related to exposure to some sort of nerve agent in Saudi Arabia."
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. This regulation also states, in pertinent part, that an injury caused by enemy released chemical, biological, or a nuclear agent would qualify for award of the Purple Heart.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he received injuries on 24 February 1991 in Southwest Asia from a sarin nerve agent during a scud attack.
2. The Board considered the medical record, dated 7 March 1991, which shows the applicant was admitted and treated for complaints of headache, dizziness, insomnia, fatigue and weakness in Southwest Asia.
3. The Board also considered the DVA report, dated 26 June 2002, wherein the physician indicated that "The problem like this could be reasonably related to exposure to some sort of nerve agent in Saudi Arabia."
4. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was injured by enemy released chemical, biological, or a nuclear agent in Southwest Asia.
5. There is also no evidence that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Southwest Asia.
6. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
7. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
8. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JNS____ TL______ BPI_____ DENY APPLICATION
CASE ID | AR2002079856 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | |
DATE BOARDED | 20030429 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078031C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085089C070212
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The Board reviewed the medical records submitted by the applicant showing that he sustained an injury to his left arm and was treated for that injury. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for emphysema he sustained as the result of oil well fires in Kuwait.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009633
It stated that "division commanders in the grade of major general who had troops committed to the combat operation and hospital commanders receiving casualties could award the Purple Heart to Soldiers who were wounded as the direct result, repeat, direct result of enemy action." There is no evidence in the record and the applicant has provided no evidence to show that a Scud missile actually exploded anywhere near the King Abdul Aziz Hospital. In the absence of conclusive evidence that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006052
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant states he was exposed to Iraqi chemical nerve agents on multiple occasions during combat operations in Operation Desert Storm. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04100731C070208
There were no service medical records available to the Board or provided by the applicant. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that he suffered from injuries resulting from chemical, biological, or nuclear agents released by the enemy during the Persian Gulf War, which required treatment by a medical officer and were made a matter of official record while deployed in support of the Gulf War. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005326
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Purple Heart. It stated that "division commanders in the grade of major general who had troops committed to the combat operation and hospital commanders receiving casualties could award the Purple Heart to Soldiers who were wounded as the direct result, repeat, direct result of enemy action." In the absence of conclusive evidence that shows he was wounded or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019506
There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart and there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070907C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009866
Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal. Item 13 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he is authorized the Kuwait Liberation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the reserve obligation termination date, the Bronze Star Medal, the Purple Heart, the Defense of Saudi Arabia, Liberation and Defense...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000111C070208
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for wounds received during the Persian Gulf War. The applicant provides a copy of a 5 December 2000 DOD letter from the Special Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Gulf War Illnesses, Medical Readiness, and Medical Deployments. There is insufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded in action.