Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102960C070208
Original file (2004102960C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        2 November 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004102960


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr.             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Margaret K. Patterson         |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Joe R. Schroeder              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert L. Duecaster           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his rank and pay grade at separation be
corrected to sergeant (E-5).

2.  The applicant states that he was promoted in Vietnam, but when he out-
processed in California there was no record of the promotion.

3.  The applicant provides a sworn statement in the form of a letter from
his supervisor in Vietnam, copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or
Discharge), DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), DA Form 20
(Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 8 September 1967.  The undated application was received on
26 January 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted, on 15 November
1965, and served in Vietnam as a lineman from 30 October 1966 to 3
September 1967.

4.  He was advanced to specialist four (E-4), on 19 January 1967.

5.  Subsequent to 19 January 1967, all references to his rank or pay grade,
including the, hand printed, 8 September 1967 Standard Form 89 (Report of
Medical History), that he provided for his separation medical examination,
indicate he was a specialist four (E-4).

6.  On 8 September 1967 the applicant was separated with an honorable
characterization of service and transferred to the Army Reserve Control
Group as a specialist four (E-4).

7.  The 1 December 2003 sworn letter is from a retired sergeant first
class, who reports that he was a section chief and the applicant's
supervisor.  While he was passing through their parent unit in late March
or early April 1967, he saw the mimeograph master of the order that showed
that the applicant had been promoted to sergeant (E-5).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The sworn statement from the applicant's  supervisor has been noted.
Unfortunately, in the absence of any evidence of record that the applicant
had been promoted, it is insufficient to overcome the presumption of
regularity.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 8 September 1967; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 7 September 1970.  However, the applicant did not file
within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MKP __  __JRS __  __RLD___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _Margaret K. Patterson___
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004102960                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041102                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |NC                                      |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009550C070208

    Original file (20040009550C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show that he served in the rank of acting sergeant. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides that the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered on an individual’s DD Form 214. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021385

    Original file (20140021385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a certificate showing award of the Army Commendation Medal. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citations and Campaign Participation Credit) shows during his service with Troop K, 3rd Squadron, 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, from February 1967 to February 1968, his unit was awarded the: * Valorous Unit Award for service on 19 June 1967 and 21 July 1967 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 1, dated 1969 * Meritorious Unit Commendation for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016623

    Original file (20110016623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her late husband's records be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant, E-5. Without orders officially promoting the FSM to sergeant, his DD Form 214 correctly shows his rank and grade at the time of his release from active duty as specialist four, E-4 and no relief is warranted. ___________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011091C070208

    Original file (20040011091C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show promotion to the rank and pay grade of sergeant, E-5. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any evidence, that he was ever promoted to sergeant, E-5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005253

    Original file (20110005253.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no orders showing the applicant was promoted to E-5 in the available records. However, his DD Form 214 shows his temporary rank and pay grade as specialist four/E-4 at the time of his separation on 8 April 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007757

    Original file (20090007757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 94B when he was released from active duty. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records and the applicant provided none to show that he was reclassified to a combat arms MOS or to any other MOS while he served on active duty or while he served in Vietnam. There is no evidence he was ever awarded any other MOS, to include a combat arms MOS, after he was reclassified into MOS 94B from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005560C070205

    Original file (20060005560C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005560 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was promoted to sergeant (SGT), E-5. Headquarters, United States Army School/Training...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02479

    Original file (BC-2007-02479.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02479 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The rating on his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) dated 4 August 2004, be changed to reflect a 5 rather than a 4. However, he contends SMSgt “M…” did make his supervisor change his rating from a “5” to a “4”. MICHAEL K....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008184

    Original file (20120008184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show his pay grade as E-5. The applicant states he should have been awarded the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017031

    Original file (20070017031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070017031 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the temporary rank of sergeant. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to...