Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007757
Original file (20090007757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007757 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the military occupational specialty (MOS) shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he did not take Army training to get the MOS 94B (Cook).  This MOS is incorrect and he cannot apply for combat status with this MOS.  He adds that he was exposed to enemy fire while in several fire bases throughout his tour of duty in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 May 1966.  He completed basic combat training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, and his advanced individual training at Fort Bliss, Texas.  On 15 September 1966, after completing all required training, he was awarded the MOS 13F (Automatic Weapons Crewman).  On 26 September 1966, the applicant was assigned to an MOS 94B duty position.  The applicant was awarded MOS 94B on 28 November 1966; MOS 13F was withdrawn.

3.  On 4 August 1967, the applicant was reassigned from Fort Bliss to Vietnam for duty with the 4th Infantry Division.  The standard name line shows he was assigned to Vietnam in MOS 94B.

4.  The applicant served in Vietnam from 3 August 1967 through 18 April 1968 with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 8th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division.

5.  On 30 August 1967, the applicant was promoted to the rank and pay grade of specialist four, E-4, in MOS 94B by Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 8th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, Unit Orders Number 29.

6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 21 April 1968 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations) as an early release of overseas returnee.  He was separated in the rank and pay grade of specialist four, E-4.  Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 94B when he was released from active duty.  On the date he was released from active duty, he had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 19 days of active military service with no lost time.

7.  There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records and the applicant provided none to show that he was reclassified to a combat arms MOS or to any other MOS while he served on active duty or while he served in Vietnam.

8.  Item 34 (Civilian Occupation) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was employed as a hotel and restaurant food service supervisor in a civilian capacity for 15 months prior to his entry on active duty.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the active Army.  The individual's primary MOS code number and title will be entered in item 23a.  All available records will be used as a basis for the preparation of the DD Form 214, including the DA Form 20, DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record), and orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The applicant contends that he was not Army-trained in MOS 94B and that this MOS is incorrect; however, the applicant's record shows:

	a.  He was employed as a hotel and restaurant food service supervisor in a civilian capacity for 15 months prior to his entry on active duty.

	b.  He was initially awarded the MOS 13F.  After being awarded this MOS, he was assigned to an MOS 94B duty position and was awarded MOS 94B 2 months later.  The MOS 13F, a combat arms MOS, was completely withdrawn.

	c.  He was assigned to Vietnam for duty in MOS 94B and while there he was promoted to specialist four, pay grade E-4, in MOS 94B.

	d.  On the date he was honorably released from active duty, he held MOS 94B.  There is no evidence he was ever awarded any other MOS, to include a combat arms MOS, after he was reclassified into MOS 94B from MOS 13F.

3.  Based on the evidence, the applicant is not entitled to a change to the MOS now shown in item 23a of his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007757



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007757



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017166

    Original file (20120017166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Having prior active service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1970 in the rank of PFC and he held MOS's 13A and 13E. There are no orders in his records that show he ever served as a CPL/E-4 or was ever promoted to SGT/E-5. There is no evidence in his record that shows he went before a promotion board and was recommended for promotion to SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028933

    Original file (20100028933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he was never a cook and his MOS on his DD Form 214 should be changed to MOS 11B. Evidence of record shows that since being awarded primary MOS 94B, he performed duties as a cook up until his release from active duty. Therefore, MOS 94B is correctly entered on the applicant's DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001494

    Original file (20080001494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to Company A, 502nd Aviation Battalion from 3 June through 22 September 1966, performing duties in MOS 94B as a cook; and that from 23 September 1966 through 22 June 1967, he was assigned to the 175th Aviation Company, initially performing duties in MOS 94B, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006194C070206

    Original file (20050006194C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In pertinent part, it directs that the primary MOS code number and title will be entered in item 23a on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed training in MOS 71H and was awarded primary MOS 71H. The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record shows he served in MOS 11B as a rifleman in Alaska and Hawaii.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015481

    Original file (20140015481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his DD Form 214 should have an MOS of 13F since he served in that MOS during his entire 12 months of service in Vietnam. There is no evidence to show he held MOS 13F at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017727

    Original file (20090017727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge because he was assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam and saw his share of fighting. There is no evidence the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS or that he served as an infantryman in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the applicant's military service records that shows he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014955

    Original file (20070014955.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070014955 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Evidence of record shows that the applicant completed advanced individual training and was awarded MOS 11B. Therefore, MOS 64B was correctly entered in Item 23a of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005328

    Original file (20110005328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 23a his MOS as 94B * item 24 no award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Based on Army Regulation 600-8-22, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge requires service in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit engaged in active ground combat with the enemy. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007503

    Original file (20090007503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 12B when he was released from active duty. The evidence shows that at the time the applicant was assigned to Vietnam he held MOS 62F. He was promoted in MOS 12B and on his release from active duty, he held this MOS as his primary MOS and MOS 62F as his secondary MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020744

    Original file (20100020744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) he was awarded MOS 71B (Clerk-Typist) on 17 May 1968 * item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 22 January 1969 to 23 February 1970 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with: * Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 79th Maintenance Battalion, from 25 January to 10 August 1969 * Headquarter and Headquarters Company, 3d Battalion, 8th Infantry,...