Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011091C070208
Original file (20040011091C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          27 September 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040011091


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Richard P. Nelson             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Ronald E. Blakely             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Lawrence Foster               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show promotion to
the rank and pay grade of sergeant, E-5.

2.  The applicant states he “was in line for promotion” in 1967 while
assigned to 3d Battalion, 47th Infantry.  He was transferred to 3d
Battalion, 39th Infantry and told his promotion orders would “follow him”
but that this “never happened.”  He further states that he served his
country honorably and would be very proud to receive his sergeant stripes.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), orders announcing his
promotion to specialist four, E-4, and orders announcing award of the
Combat Infantryman Badge.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error that
occurred on 8 May 1968.  The application submitted in this case is dated 1
December 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s records show that he was inducted on 9 May 1966 and
trained in Military Occupational Specialty 11C20 (Infantry Indirect Fire
Crewman).  He was assigned to Vietnam, where he served with Company C, 47th
Infantry from 28 January to 24 August 1967 and with Company C, 3d
Battalion, 39th Infantry from 25 August 1967 to 5 January 1968.  He
returned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky where he completed his service
obligation and was honorably separated on 8 May 1968 in pay grade E-4.

4.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted
Qualification Record) shows that the applicant was promoted to private, E-2
on 10 September 1966; to private first class, E-3 on 2 November 1966; and
to specialist fourth class, E-4 on 16 February 1967.  There are no other
entries in this item of his DA Form 20.
5.  There are no orders, or a promotion “package,” in the applicant’s
records that show he was selected for promotion to sergeant, E-5.

6.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in
effect at the time, provided specific guidance for promotion to pay grade E-
5.  The regulation also provided that promotion to this pay grade was not
mandatory, nor were there any provisions for “automatic” promotion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any evidence,
that he was ever promoted to sergeant, E-5.

2.  The applicant’s statement that he served honorably and would be proud
to receive his sergeant’s stripes is noted.  However, there is no
compelling evidence that he was ever promoted, or that an error has
occurred in his case.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy this requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the
applicant's request.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 8 May 1968; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 7 May 1971.  However, the applicant did not file within the 3-
year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation
or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___lmd__  ___reb __  ____lf___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




            _________Ronald E. Blakely_________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040011091                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050927                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003939

    Original file (20120003939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His service record is void of evidence which indicates he was assigned to Company B of the 4th Battalion, 39th Infantry during a period it was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award. His service record shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings, numerous awards, and he was promoted to SP4 during his tenure on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019712

    Original file (20120019712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 1 submitted by the applicant is a morning report for Company B, 4th Battalion, 39th Infantry, and shows the applicant was attached to that unit on 28 December 1967. There is sufficient evidence to show he was attached to Company B, 4th Battalion, 39th Infantry, on 31 January 1968, the date of the action for which the unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017430

    Original file (20060017430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. However, there is no evidence that the applicant served in an infantry duty position in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007808

    Original file (20130007808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the requested unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the current entry from item 12 of his DD Form 214 * adding the entry "COMPANY C, 3D BATTALION, 47TH INFANTRY REGIMENT, 9TH INFANTRY DIVISION, USARV" to item 11 of his DD Form 214 __________X_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016113

    Original file (20080016113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He knows the applicant, "went over with us and served in Vietnam with me from January 1967 to sometime in March or April 1967." He should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 13 March 1964 through 5 March 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge; b. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 13 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021956

    Original file (20130021956.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years of active duty service. The evidence of record shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty service and his records are void of derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018485

    Original file (20100018485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) governed award of the CIB to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. The letter he provided from his company commander is considered to be an official document of record; however, it refers to the unit engaging in ground combat after the applicant's departure from the unit. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012955

    Original file (20060012955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal and by awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states he was an 11B (infantryman) in combat and should receive the Combat Infantryman Badge and his award of the Army Commendation Medal was omitted from his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation or Discharge). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021419

    Original file (20100021419.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, to be awarded the Purple Heart and that his records be corrected to show awards of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with two or three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Air Medal, his marksmanship badges, and any other awards to which he is entitled. The applicant states that some of his awards were left off of his DD Form 214 (Armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017336

    Original file (20100017336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 1993 to show two awards of the Valorous Unit Award (VUA). The applicant's unit was cited for two awards of the VUA and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...