RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 8 July 2004
DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004100657
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Kathleen Newman | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Gail Wire | |Member |
| |Mr. William Powers | |Member |
The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration to chief
warrant officer four (CW4).
2. The applicant states that his Officer Evaluation Reports for the past
3 years were not forwarded through channels by his former unit to be placed
in his official military personnel file (OMPF). He also states that his
promotion packet and letter to the President of the promotion board were
mailed and never received by the board.
3. The applicant provides no documentation with his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resources Command – St. Louis,
it was determined that the applicant’s OMPF contained material error when
he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2003 Reserve
Components Selection Board. His Officer Evaluation Reports for the periods
ending 30 June 2000, 30 June 2001, 30 June 2002, and 23 January 2003 were
not seen.
2. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a
special selection board may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or
material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for
promotion to CW4 by the 2003 Reserve Components Selection Board and should
now be submitted for appropriate special selection board consideration for
this purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be
appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
__kn___ ___gw___ ___wp___ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by placing the Officer Evaluation Reports for the periods ending
30 June 2000, 30 June 2001, 30 June 2002, and 23 January 2003 on the OMPF
of the individual concerned.
2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his
records be submitted to a duly constituted special selection board under
the 2003 criteria, as appropriate.
3. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was
promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as
determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited,
provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for
promotion.
4. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
___Kathleen Newman__
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR2004100657 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20040708 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |131.00 |
|2. |131.10 |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083231C070215
The applicant states, in effect, that he was not selected for promotion to chief warrant officer four (CW4) because his AER (DA Form 1059), which showed his completion of the warrant officer advance course (WOAC) was not recorded in his record. It states, in pertinent part, that officers and warrant officers who have either failed selection for promotion, or who were erroneously not considered for promotion through administrative error may be reconsidered for promotion by either a promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090217C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when she was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009527C070208
The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resource Command (AHRC) – St. Louis reviewed the applicant’s record and determined he was erroneously not considered for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 and 2002 RCSBs, and that he was eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 2001 and 2002 CW4 RCSB selection criteria. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. If selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007127
The applicant requests correction of her military records to add her missing DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report) and to be reconsidered for promotion to chief warrant officer five (CW5), pay grade W-5. The applicant was non-selected for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. submitting her records to a duly constituted selection board/advisory board for promotion consideration for CW5 under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089098C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that the last officer evaluation report seen by the promotion board was for an annual training he completed in 1999. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064415C070421
The regulation also specifies that completion of the WOAC is required for promotion to CW4, no later than the convening date the appropriate selection board. In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes the applicant’s records should be corrected to show she completed the required military education on 20 April 2001, prior to the convening date of the 2001 RCSB and she is entitled to the STAB. The Board further notes that based on the applicant's PED and the 2001 and 2002 RCSB convening...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086380C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089113C070403
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000609C070206
The evidence stated as being submitted with the applicant's application was not provided to the Board. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command – St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2003 and 2004 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB). The Board determined...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089108C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 RCSB. A...