| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Stephanie Thompkins | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | ||
| Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
2. The applicant requests promotion reconsideration to chief warrant officer four (CW4).
3. The applicant states that his promotion package did not contain a copy of his course completion for the Warrant Officer Senior Course and his officer evaluation reports later than 1993.
4. He was considered and not selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 RCSB.
5. He is currently assigned in the Individual Ready Reserve.
6. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 RCSB.
7. Reserve promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record of a commissioned warrant officer at the time of consideration. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. It further specifies that promotion reconsideration by a STAB may only be based upon ABCMR determination approved by the Secretary of the Army.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to CW4 by the 2001 RCSB and should now be submitted to a duly constituted STAB for promotion reconsideration.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing an updated and completed record to include the highest level of military education and all officer evaluation reports of the individual concerned on his OMPF.
2. That following administrative implementation of the foregoing, his records be submitted to a duly constituted STAB under 2001 criteria, as appropriate.
3. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the criteria cited, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion.
4. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
BOARD VOTE:
_AAO____ _YM____ _JPI___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_ Arthur A. Omartian_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003089108 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030724 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 131.00 |
| 2. | 131.10 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089098C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that the last officer evaluation report seen by the promotion board was for an annual training he completed in 1999. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090217C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when she was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089113C070403
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090218C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW3 by the 2002 RCSB. A STAB is required for reconsideration for 1 October 1996 and later. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086380C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, it was determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected for promotion to CW4 by the 2002 RCSB. That if selected his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to the next higher grade on his date of eligibility therefore, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials using the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089465C070403
The applicant states that his 1998 officer evaluation report was never forwarded for profiling and was not seen by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089439C070403
The applicant states that all of his officer evaluation reports were not present for consideration by the 2002 promotion board. Based upon review by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and non-selected by the 2002 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for promotion to CW4 by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064415C070421
The regulation also specifies that completion of the WOAC is required for promotion to CW4, no later than the convening date the appropriate selection board. In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes the applicant’s records should be corrected to show she completed the required military education on 20 April 2001, prior to the convening date of the 2001 RCSB and she is entitled to the STAB. The Board further notes that based on the applicant's PED and the 2001 and 2002 RCSB convening...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090730C070212
Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Total Army Personnel Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer four by a Standby Advisory Board (STAB) under 2001 criteria. It was also determined that the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered for promotion to chief warrant officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073057C070403
However, in this case, the applicant could not be selected based on the fact his 2000 record did not reflect completion of the required military education requirements (WOAC) by the convene date of the board. The applicant submitted an Application for Correction of Military Records (DD Form 149) requesting a STAB due to a Code 11, OER missing from his 2001 file. However, pertinent regulations do not specify that an OER Code 11, Promotion Report is required for subsequent promotion...